*
/*
On Fri, 4/29/16, R.S. wrote:
Subject: Re: SAVING JOB OUTPUT IN A PDSE FROM SDSF
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Received: Friday, April 29, 2016, 5:06 PM
W dniu 2016-04-29 o
22:30, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
> On
2016-04-29, at 09:58, R.S. wrote:
>>>> That deserve
r more)
Extended attributes ===> (NO, OPT, or blank)
----
On Mon, 5/2/16, Richards, Robert B. wrote:
Subject: Re: SAVING JOB OUTPUT IN A PDSE FROM SDSF
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Received: Monday, May 2, 2016, 5:31 AM
Willie,
According to
Maybe put Year in DSN, member name would include Month 1-9,A,B,C, Day
01-31, Time -2359, or Day of Year 001-366, Time -2359.
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Pedro Vera wrote:
>>> Is there something I could do to prevent this from happening?
>
> I think JES2 can be customized to use seven
>> Is there something I could do to prevent this from happening?
I think JES2 can be customized to use seven digit numbers for the job number.
On my site, the jobs numbers look like J1234567. That is, you cannot prevent
the collision in job numbers, but you can lessen the frequency.
If I we
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of willie bunter
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 1:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SAVING JOB OUTPUT IN A PDSE FROM SDSF
This is what I have. In the Data set name type
On 2016-04-29, at 15:06, R.S. wrote:
>>
>> Works for me.
> You are right. Please rerun the job. I bet you'll get SB214 abend.
>
I know that well. I assumed that since the OP's requirement was to avoid
overwriting an existing member, SB214 would meet his need.
I had considered the alternative
W dniu 2016-04-29 o 22:30, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
On 2016-04-29, at 09:58, R.S. wrote:
That deserves an SR. Works in JCL; works everywhere else. The statement is
patently false.
No, it isn't. MOD is not allowed for *member* od PDS or PDSE.
MOD is allowed for PO dataset, i.e. for IEFBR14 MOD,DE
On 2016-04-29, at 09:58, R.S. wrote:
>>>
>>> That deserves an SR. Works in JCL; works everywhere else. The statement is
>>> patently false.
>> No, it isn't. MOD is not allowed for *member* od PDS or PDSE.
>> MOD is allowed for PO dataset, i.e. for IEFBR14 MOD,DELETE
>>
>> Try IEBGENER //SYSUT2
or more)
Extended attributes ===> (NO, OPT, or blank)
----
On Fri, 4/29/16, Richards, Robert B. wrote:
Subject: Re: SAVING JOB OUTPUT IN A PDSE FROM SDSF
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Received: Friday
(resend, please be patient if got two copies)
W dniu 2016-04-29 o 17:37, R.S. pisze:
W dniu 2016-04-29 o 17:31, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:49:57 +, willie bunter wrote:
Paul.
I tried out your suggestion using disp=mod however it doesn't work : MOD NOT
ALLOWED FOR PDS
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:49:57 +, willie bunter wrote:
>Paul.
>
>I tried out your suggestion using disp=mod however it doesn't work : MOD NOT
>ALLOWED FOR PDS
>
???
That deserves an SR. Works in JCL; works everywhere else. The statement is
patently false.
-- gil
--
Paul.
I tried out your suggestion using disp=mod however it doesn't work : MOD NOT
ALLOWED FOR PDS
On Thu, 4/28/16, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
Subject: Re: SAVING JOB OUTPUT IN A PDSE FROM SD
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of willie bunter
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 7:45 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SAVING JOB OUTPUT IN A PDSE FROM SDSF
Lizette,
I tried your suggestion using NEW but
Lizette,
I tried your suggestion using NEW but it doesn't work. I get the message
MEMBER NAME NOT ALLOWED
I hit the PF1 option but it wasn't much help.
On Thu, 4/28/16, Lizette Koehler wrote:
Subject: Re: SAVING JOB OUTPUT IN A PDSE
No, you cannot prevent it.
Been there...
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 2016-04-29 o 00:59, willie bunter pisze:
Hallo All,
I need your suggestions. I am savings job output in a PDSE using SDSF. The
member name I use is the job number e.g.
Member to use ===> JOB067XX
I am a
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 22:59:45 +, willie bunter wrote:
>
>I need your suggestions. I am savings job output in a PDSE using SDSF. The
>member name I use is the job number e.g.
>Member to use ===> JOB067XX
>
>I am afraid that some where down the line I could overwrite a member because
>the job
the HELP panel states.
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of willie bunter
> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 4:00 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: SAVING JOB OUTPUT IN A PDSE FROM S
Hallo All,
I need your suggestions. I am savings job output in a PDSE using SDSF. The
member name I use is the job number e.g.
Member to use ===> JOB067XX
I am afraid that some where down the line I could overwrite a member because
the job number could be the same. Is there something I coul
18 matches
Mail list logo
