Re: SCLM problem

2019-01-18 Thread Gadi Ben-Avi
I don't think so. I'll check when I get back to work next week. Gadi -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Peter Vander Woude Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 5:05 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SCLM problem Do the datasets for the isv

Re: SCLM problem

2019-01-17 Thread Peter Vander Woude
Do the datasets for the isv product happen to have the same high level qualifier as an SCLM project? If so, that is the reason you are getting the warning. Peter -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access

Re: SCLM problem

2019-01-15 Thread Gadi Ben-Avi
The ISV didn't supply source code. It was in a parameter library. Gadi -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Wayne Bickerdike Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 8:19 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SCLM problem Unusual for an ISV to supply source

Re: SCLM problem

2019-01-15 Thread Wayne Bickerdike
Unusual for an ISV to supply source code. We manage our source using SCLM but ship SMPE format, object plus MACLIB source etc. For what it's worth, I would use SCLM for this. Just build a simple project definition with test/prod levels. If the source should ever be changed by the ISV and supplied

Re: SCLM problem

2019-01-15 Thread Gadi Ben-Avi
The library is a product library for an ISV product. I don't want it to use SCLM. In an case, we did what you suggested, and the SCLM bit was reset and I was able to edit the member. Thanks Gadi -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Wayne Bickerdike

Re: SCLM problem

2019-01-15 Thread Wayne Bickerdike
That's normally a warning message when you try and edit outside of SCLM. You can ignore it or copy the PDS to a new one and rename . ORIG >> OLD NEW>>ORIG. It sounds like the members have been promoted and are locked from editing, so copy them out if you don't want SCLM control. Is

SCLM problem

2019-01-14 Thread Gadi Ben-Avi
Hi, I am trying to install an ISV product. The product was delivered as 3 XMITed libraries. I used RECEIVE to create the product libraries. When I try to edit members in the libraries, I get a message that edit is not allowed because they are under SCLM control. SCLM is being used

Re: SCLM build problem

2018-03-08 Thread Wayne Bickerdike
I have just completed the update of Xpediter TSO and CICS for a customer. I didn't have any problems with SCLM builds. As I said in my first email, post your language definition. We are all guessing... Would be helpful to know which version of the COBOL compiler you are using, is your CICS pre

Re: SCLM build problem

2018-03-08 Thread Peter Ten Eyck
Thank you for your responses. We are now thinking that a problem in the Xpediter step is the root cause of that SCLM message. The building of Xpediter DDIO entries are part of our SCLM build jobs. We do not think we have an SCLM issue at this time

Re: SCLM build problem

2018-03-07 Thread Seymour J Metz
rchant <000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 3:14 PM To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Subject: Re: SCLM build problem On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 13:59:55 -0600, Mike Schwab wrote: >A missing DDNAME will result in a SOC4. Are you sure? I don't think I've ever seen that. S0C

Re: SCLM build problem

2018-03-07 Thread Tom Marchant
On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 13:59:55 -0600, Mike Schwab wrote: >A missing DDNAME will result in a SOC4. Are you sure? I don't think I've ever seen that. S0C1, yes, because the address of the GET or PUT routine in the DCB is zero until a successful OPEN. -- Tom Marchant

Re: SCLM build problem

2018-03-07 Thread Mike Schwab
A missing DDNAME will result in a SOC4. So yes. On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 1:22 PM, Edward Finnell <000248cce9f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > That may be the missing DDNAME? > > > In a message dated 3/7/2018 1:06:51 PM Central Standard Time, > mike.a.sch...@gmail.com writes: > > >

Re: SCLM build problem

2018-03-07 Thread Edward Finnell
That may be the missing DDNAME? In a message dated 3/7/2018 1:06:51 PM Central Standard Time, mike.a.sch...@gmail.com writes:   Abend return code. Not used: 00 System: 0C4. User: 000 convert to decimal. S0C4 is a protection exception (from memory). Look in compile printout file for a

Re: SCLM build problem

2018-03-07 Thread Mike Schwab
r getting this in their SCLM build job: > > FLM44500 - >> INVOKING BUILD TRANSLATOR(S) FOR TYPE: CCDEFMEMBER: CRPX8006 > FLM06501 - TRANSLATOR RETURN CODE FROM ===> ALLOC CCMPLIST ===> 0 > FLM06501 - TRANSLATOR RETURN CODE FROM ===> ALLOC LISTING===> 0 &

Re: SCLM build problem

2018-03-07 Thread Wayne Bickerdike
Can you post the SCLM language definition statements for CCDEF. It's possible that you are missing the additional work files for the later COBOL compilers. On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 5:52 AM, Peter Ten Eyck < peter.tene...@americannational.com> wrote: > We have a programme

Re: SCLM build problem

2018-03-07 Thread Sri h Kolusu
UA.EDU> wrote on 03/07/2018 11:52:22 AM: > I am not seeing any other meaningful messages in the job. Where do I > look up what this message means? > > Software Configuration and Library Manager (SCLM) Guide and Reference? > >

SCLM build problem

2018-03-07 Thread Peter Ten Eyck
We have a programmer getting this in their SCLM build job: FLM44500 - >> INVOKING BUILD TRANSLATOR(S) FOR TYPE: CCDEFMEMBER: CRPX8006 FLM06501 - TRANSLATOR RETURN CODE FROM ===> ALLOC CCMPLIST ===> 0 FLM06501 - TRANSLATOR RETURN CODE FROM ===> ALLOC LISTIN

Breeze for SCLM withdrawn from service

2016-02-03 Thread Mosley, George
We went with ISPW (Benchmark Technologies) almost seven years ago and are way beyond satisfied. A beautifully engineered product that includes a full function IDE, an ISPF customizable presentation layer, an optional Eclipse based GUI interface and full support for distributed platforms.

Breeze for SCLM withdrawn from service

2016-02-02 Thread Karl S Huf
So in today's IBM announcement letter 916-015 it was stated that Breeze for SCLM for z/OS V1.1.x is being withdrawn from service April 30, 2017. It's also noted that Cloud 9 for SCLM, SCLM Administrator Toolkit, SCLM Developer Toolkit, and SCLM Advanced Edition for z/OS are also being withdrawn

Re: SCLM

2014-05-13 Thread Ed Finnell
Redbooks and SHARE are good learning experiences. I've got SG247392 penciled in for Redbooks and if you want more modern, this Boston SHARE on SCLM to RDZ conversion is a good starting place. https://share.confex.com/share/121/webprogram/Session13687.html Both have 'further reading

SCLM

2014-05-12 Thread Kurt Eastwood
All, Are there any SCLM experts on this list who have had to insert an INCLUDE statement in the link edit portion of an SCLM macro? I cannot figure out how to do this and any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Kurt

SCLM

2014-05-12 Thread Kurt Eastwood
All, Are there any SCLM experts on this list who have had to insert an INCLUDE statement in the link edit portion of an SCLM macro? I cannot figure out how to do this and any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Kurt -- For IBM

Re: SCLM

2014-05-12 Thread Lizette Koehler
, 2014 10:50 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: SCLM All, Are there any SCLM experts on this list who have had to insert an INCLUDE statement in the link edit portion of an SCLM macro? I cannot figure out how to do this and any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Kurt

Re: SCLM

2014-05-12 Thread Rob Scott
Use the SCLM CMD statement in your ARCHDEF - for example : CMD INCLUDE SYSLIB(FOOBAR) On 12 May 2014, at 19:00, Kurt Eastwood kurtms...@yahoo.com wrote: All, Are there any SCLM experts on this list who have had to insert an INCLUDE statement in the link edit portion of an SCLM macro

Re: SCLM

2014-05-12 Thread Kurt Eastwood
?SUBED1=ispf-lA=1 Lizette -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Kurt Eastwood Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 10:50 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: SCLM All, Are there any SCLM experts on this list who have had

Re: SCLM for sysprogs

2012-11-09 Thread Mark Hammack
We don't at my current employer, but at my last job (Fortune 100 company) we set up SCLM to control PARMLIB, PROCLIB, and some other system libraries through a set of exits. Mainly for version history, but also as part of our change control process. Mark Hammack z/OS Developer Systemware, Inc

Re: SCLM for sysprogs

2012-11-09 Thread McKown, John
We don't use SCLM either. However, I have just implemented a skunkworks project myself to do something. I posed on this the MVS-OE forum because it seemed to be more appropriate there. I use Dovetailed Technologies' Co:Z products. Using them, I can use Hybrid batch to run a series of UNIX

Re: SCLM for sysprogs

2012-11-08 Thread Mitch
John, Which product? Regards, Mitch McCluhan, Legacy Modernization Consultant -Original Message- From: John Norgauer john.norga...@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Thu, Nov 8, 2012 9:19 am Subject: SCLM for sysprogs Are any SCLM installations using

Re: SCLM for sysprogs

2012-11-08 Thread John Norgauer
SCLM stands for IBM's Software Configuration and Library Manager is used by many installations for the maintenance of source code etc. John Norgauer Senior Systems Programmer Mainframe Technical Support Services University of California Davis Medical Center 2315 Stockton Blvd ASB

Re: SCLM for sysprogs

2012-11-08 Thread Mitch
- From: John Norgauer john.norga...@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Thu, Nov 8, 2012 9:31 am Subject: Re: SCLM for sysprogs SCLM stands for IBM's Software Configuration and Library Manager is used by many installations for the maintenance of source code etc