Thank you all for the delightfully funny insight.
-- Peter Hunkeler
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp.
Poughkeepsie NY
IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> wrote on
09/25/2017 10:42:55 AM:
> From: Barry Merrill <ba...@mxg.com>
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Date: 09/25/2017 12:06 PM
> Subject: Re: SM
rame-performance-topics/id1127943573?mt=2
From: "Nims,Alva John (Al)" <ajn...@ufl.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 25/09/2017 15:57
Subject: Re: SMF30 EXCP count confusion
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
This is off th
tems Admin/Programmer 3
UFIT
University of Florida
(352) 273-1298
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Peter Hunkeler
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 10:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SMF30 EXCP count confusion
admin questions: ad...@mxg.com
tel: 214 351 1966
fax: 214 350 3694
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Peter Hunkeler
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 9:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SMF30 EXCP count
SMF manual, Chapter 10 "EXCP Count" seems to clearly state that EXCP counts are
indeed the number of EXCPs executed. Fields SMF30TEP and SMF30TEX are described
as "Total blocks transferred (accumulated EXCP counts).
I would assume that these fields still contain the number of EXCPs executed
