ood 64-bit alternatives these days.
>
> Rob
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
> Joseph Reichman
> Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2020 12:40 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: SRB routine return code
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL
>
>
Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Joseph Reichman
Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2020 12:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SRB routine return code
EXTERNAL EMAIL
Thats what I was trying to say if something went wrong from a z/os point of
view SYNCOMPADDR would contain a return code
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
> Joseph Reichman
> Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2020 12:50 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: SRB routine return code
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL
>
>
>
>
>
&
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Joseph Reichman
Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2020 12:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SRB routine return code
EXTERNAL EMAIL
Is there a way for the a SRB routine to communicate to the invoker a return
code SYNCHCOMPADDR has to do
ttp://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
> Joseph Reichman [reichman...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 7:49 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: SRB routi
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 7:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SRB routine return code
Is there a way for the a SRB routine to communicate to the invoker a return
code SYNCHCOMPADDR has to do if the SRB completed normally
thanks
Is there a way for the a SRB routine to communicate to the invoker a return
code SYNCHCOMPADDR has to do if the SRB completed normally
thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
