Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond (+hungry ZOWE concerns)

- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Colin Paice Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2021 2:30 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond (+hungry ZOWE concerns) Caution! This message was sent from outside your

Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond (+hungry ZOWE concerns)

ay, July 18, 2021 4:32 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond (+hungry ZOWE > concerns) > > Caution! This message was sent from outside your organization. > > If z/OSMF uses a lot of CPU when idle. You should increase the

Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond (+hungry ZOWE concerns)

[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Colin Paice Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2021 4:32 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond (+hungry ZOWE concerns) Caution! This message was sent from outside your organization. If z/OSMF uses a lot of CPU when

Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond (+hungry ZOWE concerns)

If z/OSMF uses a lot of CPU when idle. You should increase the number of threads. See here I cut the CPU cost of doing nothing . The default pool size is 100 - I found I needed 300 threads to avoid all the expanding and

Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond (+hungry ZOWE concerns)

Thank you Ed, excellent suggestion. I too have felt the z/OSMF cpu cycles were exorbitant, but assuming you have sufficient zIIP capacity and ZZ=YES, which now appears to be the default, then high cycles might in reality be more of a perception problem if a person is looking at a generalized