Re: VisualAge PL/I question

2021-10-29 Thread Charles Mills
So @Robin, 5668-235 IBM PL/I for MVS was *after* Optimizing V2 and *before* VisualAge PL/I? Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Robin Vowels Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 4:29 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Re: VisualAge PL/I question

2021-10-29 Thread Charles Mills
Not the answer I wanted. Seriously, thanks. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Robin Vowels Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 4:29 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: VisualAge PL/I question IBM OS

Re: VisualAge PL/I question

2021-10-29 Thread Robin Vowels
IBM OS Optimising Compiler is a product of the 1970s. VisualAge PL/I is a product of the 1990s or post 2000. On 2021-10-30 09:41, Charles Mills wrote: Is VisualAgeR PL/I V2 the same product as 5668-910 IBM OS PL/I Optimizing Compiler V2? Charles

VisualAge PL/I question

2021-10-29 Thread Charles Mills
Is VisualAgeR PL/I V2 the same product as 5668-910 IBM OS PL/I Optimizing Compiler V2? Charles -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-

Re: VisualAge

2013-04-09 Thread Timothy Sipples
VisualAge PL/I for Windows V2.1.1 and VisualAge COBOL for Windows V3.0.7 are both still available for download through IBM's electronic delivery system. (I just checked.) If you have a valid license you're all set. The old license part numbers were D5AK6LL for VisualAge PL/I Enterprise a

Re: VisualAge

2013-04-09 Thread Benjamin Huntsman
>The rules may not be the same for the MSDOS, Windows, Linux, OS2, AIX, >etc. VisualAge products. Depending on the platform what the poster >wants to do may be legal. Sorry, certainly wasn't trying to do anything shady. I know that the licenses for WDz/RAD/RDz products are non-tr

Re: VisualAge

2013-04-09 Thread Clark Morris
On 9 Apr 2013 03:31:26 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >Benjamin Huntsman wrote: > >>Was wondering, might anyone here have an old copy of VisualAge PL/I 2.1 >>and/or VisualAge Cobol 3.07 that they'd be willing to part with for some >>reasonable compe

Re: VisualAge

2013-04-09 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Benjamin Huntsman wrote: >Was wondering, might anyone here have an old copy of VisualAge PL/I 2.1 and/or >VisualAge Cobol 3.07 that they'd be willing to part with for some reasonable >compensation? Did you asked IBM? These languages are copyrighted and licensed by IBM. I doubt

VisualAge

2013-04-08 Thread Benjamin Huntsman
Hello, and apologies in advance for the noise... Not sure where else to pose the question. Was wondering, might anyone here have an old copy of VisualAge PL/I 2.1 and/or VisualAge Cobol 3.07 that they'd be willing to part with for some reasonable compensation? Many thanks in advance!!