What Kees has written is correct. My rule of thumb is the faster the CP the
lower the velocity. With CPU upgrades I typically revise the velocity down.
It would help us if you would post a snapshot of the SUM report in RMF III,
then we have all the info and not just a tiny bit and we can help
for
other jobs.
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pesce, Andy
Sent: 30 January 2020 15:24
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: WLM Guidance/Suggestions ! ! !
I have recently replace an IBM-2828 that had 5 GP's
Cheryl hasn't piped in for awhile. Widely published and referenced tuning
metrics and Goal Tender software available at www.watsonwalker.com
In a message dated 1/30/2020 10:36:33 PM Central Standard Time,
and...@blackhillsoftware.com writes:
>From my experience on systems with limited CPs
From my experience on systems with limited CPs (albeit some time ago):
- Velocities need to be reviewed. Achievable velocities might be much
lower than on a system with more CPs.
- It is critical that goals are achievable. The goal tells WLM when it
can take resources away from high
nnel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCu_65HaYgksbF6Q8SQ4oOvA
From: "Pesce, Andy"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 30/01/2020 14:24
Subject: [EXTERNAL] WLM Guidance/Suggestions ! ! !
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I have recently replace an IBM-2
I have recently replace an IBM-2828 that had 5 GP's to a newer model machine
IBM-3907-ZR1 with only 2 GP's.
Does anyone know of a guide or paper or something that might have some things
to look at or modify when reducing the number of GP's.
I have 2 classes of service for my batch jobs.One
