On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 11:46:15 +0100, Charles Mills wrote:
>I recall some hiccups when I went to POSIX(ON). IIRC code that opened
>DD:SYSPRINT formerly did what one would expect. After POSIX it created a UNIX
>file named - - you guessed it - - "DD:SYSPRINT". //DD:SYSPRINT fixed it.
>
It's ironic
- Original message From: Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Date: 9/27/19 7:30 PM
(GMT+00:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: casting with XL C\C++
compiler On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:47:42 +0100, Charles Mills wrote:> ...>FWIW,
POSIX(ON)
POSIX(ON) is perfectly fine for new code.
From an administration perspective, the user running a POSIX(ON) program needs
a RACF OMVS Segment. That's really not that big a deal. Obviously, if you run
in USS, you already have that set up.
If you have existing code (say COBOL) that is running
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:47:42 +0100, Charles Mills wrote:
>...
>FWIW, POSIX(ON) is not a problem. "My" code all runs POSIX(ON).
>
What motivation is there for POSIX(OFF)? Compatibility with lost source code?
>-Original Message-
>From: Allan Kielstra
>Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 4:
C/C++ compiler?
>
> FWIW, POSIX(ON) is not a problem. "My" code all runs POSIX(ON).
>
> Charles
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Allan Kielstra
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 4:41
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: casting with XL C\C++ compiler
Hi Charles
We are listening!
https://www-01.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/xlCC++V231ForZOsV23?OpenDocument
This is a web deliverable that co-exists (does not overwrite) the existing xlC
compiler. I hav
> Anyway read the link and give the compiler a try!
I have, and it works - very well! If you haven't tried this compiler, you
should. There are some limitations, but if you like the 64-bit LE programming
model, this compiler is a win.
-- Jerry
--
64-bit only?
Does this amount to a "stabilization" of support for 31-bit XLC/C++
compilers?
BTW: I'm happy to move to 64-bit after IBM supports 64-bit storage for most
of their OS services, in the mean time its a PITA with no real advantage
for us.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 10:41 AM Allan Kielstra
Hi Charles
We are listening!
https://www-01.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/xlCC++V231ForZOsV23?OpenDocument
This is a web deliverable that co-exists (does not overwrite) the existing xlC
compiler. I have personally used it to develop C++ code with initializer
lists, emplacem
ing?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Joseph Reichman
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 4:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: casting with XL C\C++ compiler
Hi
Seems like a lot the casting I was able t
s some real code?
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
>> Behalf Of Joseph Reichman
>> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 8:40 AM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> Subject: casting with XL C\C++ compiler
>>
>> Hi
&
Maybe you would like to show us some real code?
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Joseph Reichman
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 8:40 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: casting with XL C\C++ compiler
>
>
The first bit of guidance is ... Don't Do That!!
I could not quite figure out what you meant, but this compiled for me with no
errors
struct S
{
int i;
};
void X()
{
S * p;
char Buffer[1000];
p = (S *) Buffer;
p = reinterpret_cast(Buffer);
// no way static_cast will
On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:40:17 -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>
>Seems like a lot the casting I was able to do with the Visual Studio C\C++
>compiler I am not able to do with XL C\C++ compiler>
>
>A specific case struct * pointer the I would like to assign a char[1200]
>via Struct pointer *
>
>Buffe
Hi
Seems like a lot the casting I was able to do with the Visual Studio C\C++
compiler I am not able to do with XL C\C++ compiler
A specific case struct * pointer the I would like to assign a char[1200]
via Struct pointer *
Buffer char[1200]
pointer = (pointer)&buffer; generate
15 matches
Mail list logo
