22, 2020 8:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
In regards to TYPRUN=COPY not working.
In case anybody is interested in this, I received notice yesterday that PTF
UJ04073 is now available for this APAR. I haven't installed it yet but it's
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:02:53 +, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>In regards to TYPRUN=COPY not working.
>
>In case anybody is interested in this, I received notice yesterday that PTF
>UJ04073 is now available for this APAR. I haven't installed it yet but it's
>there.
>
Where I see:
Local fix
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 8:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
IBM assigned an APAR number on Friday to this. It is APAR OA59800.
Thanks,
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent
Thx for that info...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 8:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust
IBM assigned an APAR number on Friday to this. It is APAR OA59800.
Thanks,
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 9:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
Not assigned yet. I'll let you know when I get it.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 9:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
Apar number?
-Original Message
Apar number?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 9:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the
sender
2.4 and SDSF question
Hello list,
I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, instead have a competing
product. As part of our testing of 2.4, one of my coworkers submitted a job
with TYPRUN=COPY on the job card and found it doesn't work. Under 2.2, we get
the entire in
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
This is an interesting discussion.
So TYPRUN=COPY is just suppose to copy the JCL to SYSOUT. I am not sure what
the expectation is by the OP
But on my z/OS 2.3 system with SDSF (I know he wants to know about other vendors
I can see the JCL
Good point. As a matter of fact, I looked at both jobs' output on both the
2.3 and 2.4 systems with SDSF.
To be completely unambiguous, I think I must be wordy & redundant (not a
poke at anyone... take that literally).
The TYPRUN=COPY job that *ran* on 2.3 displayed with complete JCL in SDSF
on
ith
> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 4:00 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
>
> Well... I just tried it, and it's true... when run on z/OS 2.4, only the
> job card is listed; whereas on 2.3, all the JCL shows up.
>
> N.B.:
.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Steve Smith
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 4:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
Well... I just tried it, and it's true... when run on z/OS 2.4, only the job
card
Discussion List On Behalf Of
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 3:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
This is an interesting discussion.
So TYPRUN=COPY is just suppose to copy the JCL to SYSOUT. I am not sure what
the expectation
Well... I just tried it, and it's true... when run on z/OS 2.4, only the
job card is listed; whereas on 2.3, all the JCL shows up.
N.B.: This isn't an SDSF issue. SDSF does not run jobs, and does not spool
their output. JES2 (or 3) does that.
sas
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:50 PM Lizette
: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 1:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
I get the same result under z/OS 2.4. I submit the following job:
//ALOEFTST JOB $,CLASS=A,MSGCLASS=Y,TYPRUN=COPY
//IEFBR14 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
SDSF has a record count of 12
On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 11:32 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
Hello list,
I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, instead have a competing
product. As part of our testing of 2.4, one of my coworkers submi
Default is MSGLEVEL=(1,1)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 2:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization
this is under z/OS 2.3:
//BWTESTER JOB (xx,xx,xx),'BRIAN WESTERMAN',MSGCLASS=V,
JOB07842
//CLASS=R,NOTIFY=,TIME=1440,TYPRUN=COPY
00020056
//* REFER WESTERB.PDS.DATA(COMMANDZ)
Of
Michael Babcock
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 3:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
The default MSGLEVEL was 1,1 and that’s what was coded on the jobcard.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:47 PM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Hi Michael and Allan,
>
;
> Rex
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of Michael Babcock
> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 2:08 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
>
> I get the same thing you do unde
s again,
>
> Rex
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of Michael Babcock
> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 2:08 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
>
> I get the sa
: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
I get the same thing you do under z/OS 2.4. About 12 lines of output. I
have SDSF.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:32 PM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, instead have a
I get the same thing you do under z/OS 2.4. About 12 lines of output. I
have SDSF.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:32 PM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, instead have a
> competing product. As part of our testing of 2.4, one of my
Works for me with no issues. However I use sdsf.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 1:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Joe
Monk
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 1:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
There is an APAR for 0C4 in JES2 when TYPRUN=COPY...
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/apar/OA57427
Joe
On Tue, Jun 16
There is an APAR for 0C4 in JES2 when TYPRUN=COPY...
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/apar/OA57427
Joe
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:32 PM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, instead have a
> competing product. As part of our testing of
Hello list,
I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, instead have a competing
product. As part of our testing of 2.4, one of my coworkers submitted a job
with TYPRUN=COPY on the job card and found it doesn't work. Under 2.2, we get
the entire input stream before the JES2 job
27 matches
Mail list logo
