On Wed, 29 May 2013 22:22:33 -0400 Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net
wrote:
: Running a program under TSO TEST
:I got the above abend after a BSAM READ. Would anyone know what this is about
What did you understand from looking up the abend in SYSTEM CODES?
--
Binyamin Dissen
Micheal Butz wrote:
Running a program under TSO TEST
Under what conditions of TEST?
I got the above abend after a BSAM READ. Would anyone know what this is about
Please post the full message text as well any message(s) found in SYSLOG.
Can you repeat the problem with/without TEST?
As
*** Cross-posted to CICS-L, IMS-L and IBM-MAIN listservers ***
Hi,
Any problems/caveats/does/don'ts with IMS/DB V12 connected to CICS V3.2 ?
A customer of mine will go CICS V4.2, but his installation upgrade
planning starts with IMS/DB V12(coming from UNsupported IMS/DB V9).
IMS 12's
hi All,
In all ISPF screen(s) there is one place been configured to have a ' PROD '
message (in row 20,col 40 to 45) stamped there. I feel somebody at some stage
might have tweaked the LOGMODE or something for this. This becomes irritating
when we look thru the log for certain problems
Shameem .K .Shoukath wrote:
In all ISPF screen(s) there is one place been configured to have a ' PROD '
message (in row 20,col 40 to 45) stamped there. I feel somebody at some stage
might have tweaked the LOGMODE or something for this. This becomes irritating
when we look thru the log for
On Thu, 30 May 2013 03:22:46 -0700, Shameem .K .Shoukath
shameemkshouk...@yahoo.com wrote:
In all ISPF screen(s) there is one place been configured to have a ' PROD '
message
(in row 20,col 40 to 45) stamped there. I feel somebody at some stage might
have
tweaked the LOGMODE or something
hi,
This is only on ISPF application. I can't see it in READY prompt or CICS
either.
I seriously doubt the netview relation to it. The application ids defined
are like below
TSOP
TSOD
TSOQ1
but the display field for respective systems are like,
PROD
TSO QA1
DEV
Hello Barbara, other kind folk,
Am not ADCD, am Dallas guest z/OS with seven days left to get Debug
working, not a sysprog, User Guide is only 576 pages, Installation Guide
similiar:-))).
Have dug into EZA111.SEQATLIB, found EQAZDFLT (which refs IGY.SIGYCOMP),
EQAZDSYS and EQAZDUSR,
All of you on zEC12, running in parallel sysplex heads up. There are apparent
bugs in CF code on these boxes that will cause CF failure in your sysplex. We
experienced the CF failure. The first fix .008 has been out for a month,
while the final 2 MCL fixes .009, .010 for this problem became
Hi,
my apologies for sending below email before giving it a try.
I tried steps Roger Bowler suggested and it worked.. Life made easy
Thanks Guys ...appreciated
Thanks and Regards
Shameem K Shoukath
From:
I seem to recall there being some sort of public domain utility program,
modification or TSO/ISPF exit that forced the z/OS system name on ISPF screens.
This facility predated the ISPF provided SYSNAME command.
I would check with your systems programmer to see if they have record of this
hi there,
I was just going thru the IPL statistics of all LPARs in out org. I see in one
LPAR the SMFWAIT is taking fairly longer comp to others. out of total 00:01:12
MSI time this takes 00:00:53.586
I am not sure what happens in this process, took a chance compared the
SMFPRMxx and
I think the tweak is this:
You have to go to Settings, then in the action bar choices put the cursor
on the Identifier field and supposing PROD is your system name, select
4 System Name and de-select the field Display System name.
Please let me know if this helps,
Regards
Gonzalo Cengotita
On Thu, 30 May 2013 13:06:16 +, Rob Scott rsc...@rocketsoftware.com wrote:
I seem to recall there being some sort of public domain utility program,
modification or TSO/ISPF exit that forced the z/OS system name on ISPF
screens. This facility predated the ISPF provided SYSNAME command.
Hey
I have DFHSM running on z/OS 1.11. It migrates certain SMS managed volumes when
they hit a certain percent full and keep migrating until a lower threshhold is
hit. My question is this. What order does it dump datasets? Does it start in
the vtoc and go in sequential order? The customer
seems to
Check to see if the image is recording SMF19. This can take a lot of time
HTH,
snip
I was just going thru the IPL statistics of all LPARs in out org. I see in one
LPAR the SMFWAIT is taking fairly longer comp to others. out of total 00:01:12
MSI time this takes 00:00:53.586
I am not
Oldest datasets are migrated first until the low threshold is reached.
The theory behind this is that the relationship between reference time and
current date is inversely proportional to the likelihood the dataset will be
referenced.
i.e. longer interval = reduced likelihood of reference.
HTH,
I am looking to see how other shops are currently doing Backups for DR and
OR. I think this will be valuable for the archives.
Currently I have the following processes in Place. Any suggestions or
guidelines for this analysis will be appreciated.
2 EMC VMAX arrays (could be Hitachi or IBM). 2
I suggest this Redbook:
http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247816.html?Open
Bob
Shameem .K .Shoukath wrote:
hi there,
I was just going thru the IPL statistics of all LPARs in out org. I see in one LPAR the SMFWAIT is taking fairly longer comp to others. out of total 00:01:12 MSI
Although very few shops actually do this, IMO the procedure should be:
Management walks in the room and says You, you, and you are dead as of
time/date. The rest of you go recover as of that time/date.
The dead people cannot be consulted with during the DR exercise. You, you,
and you should be
Yeah after losing a data center and DR to Semtek it changes your
perspective.
Wish we had a Cloud! Well the tertiary cold site kicked in and they were
back on the air in about a week. YMMV...
In a message dated 5/30/2013 2:09:46 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
allan.stal...@kbmg.com writes:
You are dead right of course.
Disasters don't come on schedule, neatly tied up in a bow.
A good thing might be a brainstorming session on what are our implicit
disaster-related assumptions? and then questioning those assumptions.
Charles
Composed on a mobile: please excuse my brevity
Back before I got into the Software industry, I worked for a public utility
in Chicago. My first foray into DR was pushing for data-comm fallbacks at
our remote sites. At first we got questioned, but finally we got them
approved. Then I brought up the dead pool test idea, and was laughed at.
For reason code 4 the explanation says
A program issued a SVC 114 the EXCPVR macro but a error occurred durning
page-fix or page-unfix processing A page-fix error can occur
If the EXCP processor tries to fix pages
That are not assigned to the callers ASID
The blksize in the program is 27930
For
There were several Chicago stories at SHARE and others. Still remember the
Ryder presentation after Hurricane Andrew. They even had 'Helper' teams for
families that had damage or were displaced.
In a message dated 5/30/2013 2:52:55 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
wdri...@us.ibm.com writes:
First, something bad happened somewhere and very likely left some forensic
evidence. Then EXCP's recovery routines were invoked and decided to classify
the error as an S800-4 ABEND. Then maybe a dump was produced. I suggest you
look at the System Trace that is in your SYSUDUMP (you do have
On Thu, 30 May 2013 15:56:39 -0400, Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net
wrote:
For reason code 4 the explanation says
A program issued a SVC 114 the EXCPVR macro
That may be a possible clue to your problem. It says you're using EXCPVR, and
from z/OS V1R13.0 DFSMSdfp Advanced Services we can
I am doing this @work in a problem state environment
Sent from my iPhone
On May 30, 2013, at 5:02 PM, Walt Farrell walt.farr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 30 May 2013 15:56:39 -0400, Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net
wrote:
For reason code 4 the explanation says
A program issued a SVC
On Thu, 30 May 2013 11:44:32 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
So do I have overkill? .
Software disasters can be the hardest ones to plan for. What do
you do if one of your critical applications has a program change that
causes it to start corrupting data? How long will it take before it is
Sysudump is empty
Sent from my iPhone
On May 30, 2013, at 4:11 PM, DASDBILL2 dasdbi...@comcast.net wrote:
First, something bad happened somewhere and very likely left some forensic
evidence. Then EXCP's recovery routines were invoked and decided to classify
the error as an S800-4 ABEND.
Would anyone have examples of
Getbuf used with BSAM read
I think it might help my problem
Sent from my iPhone
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
On Thu, 30 May 2013 16:15:42 -0500, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Thu, 30 May 2013 11:44:32 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
So do I have overkill? .
Software disasters can be the hardest ones to plan for. What do
you do if one of your critical applications has a program
Yes, this!
Prereq: The company must have a DR manager of which one of his
responsibilities is to ensure the families of those who leave are taken
care of. Here I'm thinking of natural disasters like hurricanes.
Second: A real DR test would include actually running the business from
the DR
BUILD? Shades of 1966! It is not reentrant.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
So...
Sent from my iPhone
On May 30, 2013, at 9:52 PM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com wrote:
BUILD? Shades of 1966! It is not reentrant.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
On Thu, 30 May 2013 19:12:54 -0400 Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net
wrote:
:Would anyone have examples of
:Getbuf used with BSAM read
:I think it might help my problem
I wonder what difficulty you have with GETBUF - it only has two parameters.
--
Binyamin Dissen
Bob:
I was puzzled by his question. Then I remembered one time a LONG time
ago (when SMF first went to VSAM) that we IPL'd and did not know
about having to format the MAN datasets and the system did
automatically.
Could that be his issue?
Ed
On May 30, 2013, at 1:55 PM, Bob Rutledge
Alan,
In a company I worked for they would have shot the people, Crazy
company.
Ed
On May 30, 2013, at 2:09 PM, Staller, Allan wrote:
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Jan Vanbrabant asks:
Any problems/caveats/does/don'ts with IMS/DB V12 connected to CICS V3.2?
I don't expect so. That's a supported combination. Both IMS DB V12 and CICS
TS V3.2 are still within their standard support periods as I write this.
39 matches
Mail list logo
