Peter,
Yes, some confusion was caused by terminology: I regard VLF as the manager of
the cache and the exploiters as doing 'caching', meaning giving an object to
VLF to put it in its cache.
Finally, the first and basic question of this thread was:
-can I use VLF trimming statistics as a good
You should up your buffers (and NCP). Two will be spending a lot of time
waiting.
Just remember that after a CHECK shows EOF, you should not expect a valid
status from the pending reads.
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 12:20:08 -0500 Sam Golob sbgo...@cbttape.org wrote:
:Hi Folks,
:
: I was just
We've been approved for zOS zNALC licensing on some of our lpars, and I
was asked to research the reporting requirements. Are there any
requirements other than identifying these lpars as zNALC, and continue
to report usage on the SCRT report?
--
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
Tampa, FL
Mark,
I would send an email to Al Sherkow and ask him. a...@sherkow.com
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mark Jacobs
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 8:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: zNALC Reporting
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2014 2:14 AM
[ snip ]
- smoke/vapor-based recording;
I use the word recording here quite consciously. These recording systems
could not be played back
when they were
Chase, John wrote:
Might have been fun to hear Chopin and Liszt play Dueling Pianos :-)
Could be serious 'fun', hmmm! ;-)
Serious music were played by musicians on toy pianos, see last paragraphs in
this URL:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toy_piano
Though originally made as a child's
The next meeting is this Wednesday. The agenda and sign up instructions may be
found at: http://www.vm.ibm.com/events/HILL1214.PDF
We have a good number signed up already but still have space for more.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
Mr. Kaptein,
SDSF uses RMF to obtain information and display it in DA panel.
As far as I remember, there is a way to obtain this info from your IOF Lpars,
by loading in LPA some SDSF modules.
There is an explanation in IBM-MAIN archives, I think from Mr. Mark Zelden,
that I've tested and it
I installed a feature pack for CICS. It came as a separate FMID. We
are having trouble making it work, so I wanted to make sure that we
had the latest maintenance for it.
That tells me why you want to install (APPLY) PTFs for a single FMID.
It does not answer my question of why you feel it
In 8902901628988927.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
11/30/2014
at 11:51 AM, Paul Gilmartin
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu said:
Can this information be supplied from HLASM
Yes.
(but this would be harder for us to automate.)
Why can't you pass the necessary
In
CAE1XxDHQB8Mn99LQZcydqGc5QHGPR5HJC-bNPmv0H==um7c...@mail.gmail.com,
on 11/30/2014
at 01:19 PM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com said:
AINSERT is then used to
'save' them, and AREAD is used to put them into the output.
That's not even wrong! He needs a PUNCH or REPRO to get them into
the
I was working on a specific product and *ONLY* wanted maintenance for that.
Time and again I had to figure out all the pertaining PTF's and do a
select(,,,,eee, etc etc) I did NOT want maintenance
for other products to be recieved and applied.
(I know I'm going to kick my
Thank's BabyEklavaya..
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:40 PM, baby eklavya baby.ekla...@gmail.com
wrote:
Issue K Q,L=consolename to clear the backlog
To see the backlog information , issue D C,B and look out for NBUF value in
the output
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Lizette Koehler
If you have any mobile device transactions, you can work with your IBM
account representative to get a discount for these transactions.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Mark Jacobs mark.jac...@custserv.com wrote:
We've been approved for zOS zNALC licensing on some of our lpars, and I was
asked
Shmuel was, of course, entirely correct in saying that a PUNCH or
REPRO statement is necessary to get them into the output; but this
surpassingly obvious observation is not very interesting.
The AINSERTs and AREADs are needed to sequence IDENTIFY binder
control statements properly: They must
First, I can't resist saying that as it seems to have taken a full
decade for members of this group to perceive a significant lack, it
seems the decision to drop the book was a good one!
That aside, the vast majority of customers install z/OS using ServerPac.
ServerPac, in turn, provides far
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 19:32:45 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
at 11:51 AM, Paul Gilmartin said:
Can this information be supplied from HLASM
Yes.
Can it be more straightforward than JWG's suggestion?
(but this would be harder for us to automate.)
Why can't you pass the necessary
Or possibly when the precursor to the binder was developed that long ago,
whoever wrote this section figured with a 44 character DSN being the longest
available, they padded it with 20 bytes to make sure it was plenty long. Then
when Unix-style path names came along later, whoever added the
Hi John,
I have seen and used the ServerPac resources you mentioned and found them very
helpful and useful.
What about the majority who do not have access to ServerPac? With role based
security these days, many, perhaps most, do not have access.
Thanks,
Linda
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec
Thanks Bob.
Mark: You need to mark the LPAR, which most sites now do with IEASYSXX,
LICENSE=zNALC. SCRT will take care of the rest. You still need to audit SCRT
and the resultant invoices you receive from IBM.
You also need to apply for zNALC annually, which entails updating your original
On Dec 1, 2014, at 8:41 AM, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
Kurt:
We wanted to bring RACF to the latest level without the other
acruttumonts(sp?) so w just wanted to receive maintenance for RACF.
We had an issue and level 2 want ptf X on and x was in the the group
of PTFS that we wanted to
Kurt:
We didn't have the DASD space at the time (we needed a few extra
volumes for maintenance and they were being used by another
application). We were in a DASD constrained environment.
Ed
On Dec 1, 2014, at 8:49 AM, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
I was working on a specific product and
Once the data sets have all been allocated for the first time, for most
things you can model after one that exists and tweak as needed. But for
formal documentation, people without READ access to the ServerPac data
sets *should* be able to find allocation information for individual data
sets
Miles Davis biographer and producer said while they were outlining Man with
a Horn(album) Miles had his kids piano and was banging out ideas, but only
about half the keys worked. He could hear them in his vision, but for mere
mortals it was difficult to comprehend.
In a message dated
On 30 November 2014 at 20:33, Graham Harris harris...@gmail.com wrote:
I setup a filter in gmail to send all IBM-MAIN stuff to its own folder (or
label?), and my experience is that nothing (IBM-MAIN-wise) then gets sent
to spam - the filter overrides it.
Unfortunately it doesn't override the
Gmail could, in the sense that it is within Google's technical
capacity, deal with this problem. It has instead elected to discover
that characteristic, long-standing LISTSERV behavior is a species of
'phishing'.
This position has no technical merit. It is, I suppose, convenient;
but it opens
Hi Folks,
For those of you who wish to install XMIT-Manager (originally from
Neal Johnston-Ward) on 64-bit Windows systems, there is a version of it
which was modified by Robert A.H. Prins to install there.
I had placed this version on File 916 of the CBT Tape, but it needs
a
Hi John,
It is management that approves access - or not! And if IBM packs documentation
that appears to be only for the installer, that is who it is for, paraphrasing
here. sigh. Just the way it is.
Linda
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 1, 2014, at 12:03 PM, John Eells ee...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 13:49:37 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
We didn't have the DASD space at the time (we needed a few extra
volumes for maintenance and they were being used by another
application). We were in a DASD constrained environment.
Is there a further performance concern in that if the user
Thanks Sam. It works fine on my 64-bit Windows 8 laptop.
Sam Golob wrote:
Hi Folks,
For those of you who wish to install XMIT-Manager (originally from
Neal Johnston-Ward) on 64-bit Windows systems, there is a version of it
which was modified by Robert A.H. Prins to install there.
In
CAE1XxDG4NRGnr2hk-=cdsgdxqs1nuv7ucbru4ntyy_ebkmx...@mail.gmail.com,
on 12/01/2014
at 11:18 AM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com said:
surpassingly obvious
It should have been obvious *before* you incorrrecvtly described the
roles in AINSERT and AREAD.
The AINSERTs and AREADs are needed to
The problem I had with it was that there doesn't seem to be any way to
order maintenance for an FMID (or product) until *after* it has been
applied. I would have much preferred to have applied all maintenance
along with the FMID, particularly since there were ++IFREQs against the
FMID that
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 00:04:50 -0500, Tim Henness wrote:
The problem I had with it was that there doesn't seem to be any way to
order maintenance for an FMID (or product) until *after* it has been
applied. I would have much preferred to have applied all maintenance
along with the FMID, particularly
That's my point, SyzSPOOL/z already does just that, and to add the capability
to SyzMPF/z would place it in competition with our own product. Besides,
getting the STEP and MAX condition codes with the runtime details is useful,
but to send the entire job just because we can seems to be
At 11:18 -0500 on 12/01/2014, John Gilmore wrote about Re: SMP/E and
IDR (was: Binder SETSSI ...?):
Shmuel was, of course, entirely correct in saying that a PUNCH or
REPRO statement is necessary to get them into the output; but this
surpassingly obvious observation is not very interesting.
35 matches
Mail list logo
