I have a step like this in each of my zfs clone jobs to do that sort of thing:
//ZFSADM1 EXEC PGM=IOEAGSLV,REGION=0M,
// PARM=('-aggregate OMVS.PR02.ROOT.Z21RSA -recoveronly')
Dana
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 12:53:31 -0500, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
>I noticed both the TX the MACHMIG options.
>We have a tight schedule for the move, do you
>recommend turning MACHMIG on or off as a start?
I really don't have a recommendation.
I suppose if things go "well" then jumping in with both feet (i.e., not
using MACHMIG) will get you to the end
The full agenda has now been released for the GSE UK Large Systems working
group meeting on the 28th March at CA offices, Berkshire.
To download the agenda please follow this link: http://bit.ly/2lYpYnp
--
For IBM-MAIN
W dniu 2017-03-06 o 14:37, Carmen Vitullo pisze:
I check the filesystems using the diff uss command
mount the new FS somewhere temporart like
/u/userid/tmp
then use the diff command to compare the dir and file structure write the
results to a compare.txt file
diff -r /u/userid/tmp /oldmount/
The link doesn't work very well for me.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Hum, OK, I understand, I've just never had the need, or found the need, once it
mounts OK, and I can see a DIR structure, it's good for me, the diff -r just
further validates the correctness, I guess you can user IDCAMS VERIFY prior to
mounting the zfs
Carmen
- Original Message -
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:50 AM, R.S.
wrote:
> W dniu 2017-03-06 o 14:37, Carmen Vitullo pisze:
>
>> I check the filesystems using the diff uss command
>> mount the new FS somewhere temporart like
>> /u/userid/tmp
>> then use the diff command to compare the dir
Well things came together faster than I thought so we have the full agenda
and registration details available at
http://www.vm.ibm.com/events/HILL0317.PDF
Neale
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
Great info John, thank you, I knew ZFS did some integrity check during mount
processing, you can see the delay's when you clone a ZFS FS from one system and
mount it to another, along with a nice little message that tells you he's (zfs)
is checking the file because the last owner was xxxyy...
Well, it could be just me but I get 366k of something which provides links to
local files which don't exist. Anyway, I doubt they'll let me attend.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Any thoughts on the following -
https://www.ca.com/us/company/newsroom/press-releases/2017/ca-technologies-to-acquire-veracode-the-leading-saas-based-secure-devops-platform.html
?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 15:13:32 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote:
>Did anyone notice the z/OS 2.3 preview announcement today?
>http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/ShowDoc.wss?docURL=/common/ssi/rep_ca/5/897/ENUS217-085/index.html_locale=en
>
>I found this interesting:
>
>
>New support is planned to be added
X-posted from a thread on MVS-OE
How would I determine which standard C library functions imply or cause a
dub? (Other than by trying them without an OMVS segment and seeing if they
blow up?) Is this documented somewhere? I guess another way of phrasing the
question is "how would I determine
[Default] On 7 Mar 2017 16:15:09 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (Paul Gilmartin) wrote:
>On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 15:13:32 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote:
>
>>Did anyone notice the z/OS 2.3 preview announcement today?
I'm not sure if this is a comprehensive list, but if you look at:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.bpxb100/callservd.htm
You'll find the Unix System Services assembler callable services listed by
C function name. There's no guarantee that there _is_ such
>
> My cynical reaction dating back to MVS/XA 2.2 is that IBM wants to
> charge you more for being trailing edge such as forcing JES3 customers
> to by Bulk Data Transfer if they wanted SNA/NJE (a product that got
> dead ended) and providing SMS in the JES2 environment (this may have
> been
All I can say is that it seems that anything CA put its finger goes south, IMO.
Ed
> On Mar 7, 2017, at 6:43 PM, x ksi wrote:
>
> Any thoughts on the following -
>
Greetings all,
I was able to get SASSBSTR running successfully, but in the process may have
discovered a bug in the program. SASSBSTR allows you to specify your own
pair of BATCHIN DD and BATCHOUT DD datasets using PARM DSNPFX. SASSBSTR
allocates datasets for BATCHIN and BATCHOUT using the prefix
It downloads an xhtml document to my system.
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Leanne Wilson wrote:
> The full agenda has now been released for the GSE UK Large Systems working
> group meeting on the 28th March at CA offices, Berkshire.
>
> To download the agenda please
19 matches
Mail list logo