AW: Re: doubt on catalog

>on RDZ ,SYSA lpar we mentioned script like this" 0A91 3390 C:\**\***\ " , is non-sms volume i installed product using smpe and place the all required data-set on . Now we planned to use the same product on SYST , instead of installing the product from scratch , we

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

On 22/11/2017 4:46 PM, Styles, Andy (ITS zPlatform Services) wrote: Classification: Public Perhaps Tom could be persuaded to port Vista to Linux :-) That would be fantastic. I'm one of Toms customers (a very happy one). It may be worth a try to see how Vista goes with Wine. Same problem

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

Or Mac? Desperately need a good 3270 client with a responsive developer on Mac. (Current one is Mochasoft TN3270 which leaves quite a bit to be desired.) Cheers, Martin Martin Packer zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM +44-7802-245-584 email:

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

Classification: Public Perhaps Tom could be persuaded to port Vista to Linux :-) I've used x3270, and I find it functional, but lacking. Both keyboard remapping and font support are stuck in the 90s. Andy Styles z/Series Systems Programmer -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

On 11/22/2017 1:46 AM, Styles, Andy (ITS zPlatform Services) wrote: I've used x3270, and I find it functional, but lacking. Both keyboard remapping and font support are stuck in the 90s. Open source software works because users participate. Send Paul some diffs. -- Jack J. Woehr #

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

On 11/22/2017 6:22 PM, Jack J. Woehr wrote: On 11/22/2017 1:46 AM, Styles, Andy (ITS zPlatform Services) wrote: I've used x3270, and I find it functional, but lacking. Both keyboard remapping and font support are stuck in the 90s. Open source software works because users participate. Send Paul

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

On 11/21/2017 10:51 PM, David Crayford wrote: There's not much choice on Linux. x3270 is full of bugs and not well maintained. Have you reported the bugs? Paul has always been very responsive in my experience. -- Jack J. Woehr # Science is more than a body of knowledge. It's a way

Re: CF REPORT

From report1 , we don't need to add more cf physical Link or subchannel From report2 and report 3, More cf physical Link or subchannel need be added. I wonder whether we need add more cf physical Link or subchannel or not? Jason Cai From: Mark A. Brooks Date: 2017-11-22 23:02 To: IBM-MAIN

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

On 23/11/2017 9:21 AM, Jack J. Woehr wrote: On 11/21/2017 10:51 PM, David Crayford wrote: There's not much choice on Linux. x3270 is full of bugs and not well maintained. Have you reported the bugs? Paul has always been very responsive in my experience. No. I probably would if he

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

Mocha TN3270 is not great by any means but it's a good example of what can be done using JavaScript/HTML5. A really good webdev could create an amazing 3270 emulator for the browser. Chrome apps can also run on mobile devices and desktops so are truly cross-platform/device. Another great

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

It's not zero footprint at all. It requires a back-end application server! A pure ZERO footprint 3270 emulator would be client-side only. On 22/11/2017 7:34 PM, Prem Swami wrote: IBM HACP EE could be of interest to the users looking for a pure ZERO footprint 3270 emulator -

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

I haven't used anything else for many years now and NEVER had an Issue about support questions. Tom usually answers in a matter of minutes. bill From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of David Crayford

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

>I was perfectly happy with PCOMM 6.x and never would have upgraded >except that it didn't work with the Windows 10 Creators Update Edition. This Microsoft hack to disable the Font Cache in Windows/10 allows PCOMM 5.7 to work again

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

I simply don't understand why anyone would still be putting up with PCOMM. Tom Brennan Vista remains both well and fully supported. It is, was, and will always be the best. Dave Cole ColeSoft Marketing 414 Third Street, NE Charlottesville, VA 22902 EADDRESS:

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

On 22/11/2017 7:34 PM, Prem Swami wrote: IBM HACP EE could be of interest to the users looking for a pure ZERO footprint 3270 emulator - https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg27050112 If it's as well tested as PCOMM we might have to swerve :)

Re: doubt on catalog

yes, i want to use the same disk file but not on both system. the disk i used before for sysA( sysA is not active now) . Now i want to use it for sysT . On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Peter Hunkeler wrote: > > >on RDZ ,SYSA lpar we mentioned script like this" 0A91 3390 >

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

+1 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jesse 1 Robinson Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 10:44 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release Two words. Vista TN3270. . .

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

IBM HACP EE could be of interest to the users looking for a pure ZERO footprint 3270 emulator - https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg27050112 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send

Re: doubt on catalog

A user catalog is available on the systems where the DEFINE ALIAS statements have been run to put the aliases in the master catalog. On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: > I’m still fuzzy on what problem you're trying to solve, but I want to observe

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

On 11/22/2017 7:50 PM, David Crayford wrote: No. I probably would if he moved his repository to github so I could open an issue. One of the interesting tools in this suite is the screen scraper s3270. There's a bug tracker on his SourceForge repository. Some of us older open source

SAS - DB2 conversion to Java

Hi listers We are planning to take-up an POC for converting SAS (including SAS - DB2 ) programs to Java in order to save on SAS licencing cost and mainframe GCP MSU$. Can someone Please provide any pointers in the right direction or share his or her experience, Please. regards Munif

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

On 23/11/2017 3:03 PM, Jack J. Woehr wrote: On 11/22/2017 7:50 PM, David Crayford wrote: No. I probably would if he moved his repository to github so I could open an issue. One of the interesting tools in this suite is the screen scraper s3270. There's a bug tracker on his SourceForge

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

On 11/21/2017 7:36 PM, Ed Jaffe wrote: This problem is not caused by a messed up keyboard map. Incredibly, the DEL key simply does not work any more! I opened a PMR and IBM was able to identify and fix the problem overnight. I installed an updated pcskbd.dll this morning and all is well.

IBM GRS Monitor report

We ran IBM's GRS Monitor batch reports and noticed something in one of the reports. Notice the second entry, it has a x'004D'. The reason this is interesting to us is because we are sharing this particular volume between two systems. The second system is not in the GRS Star configuration of the

Re: IBM GRS Monitor report

some products or utilities will reserve the volume but if you are not in the same MIM PLEX or GRS, I think you're taking a big chance, I'll assume this volume is not a critical, or I'd hope a non critical volume and does not contain any PDS/E's or PDS/E sharing is turned off for that system .

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

I do count TN3270 as a given. The Chrome apps have shown you don't need the http protocol for a browser based app. On 22/11/2017 10:18 PM, Charles Mills wrote: I guess it depends on which foot the zero applies to. Most 3270 emulators are "zero host footprint" assuming you count TN3270 as a

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

Probably overkill, but I had a separate reason to run Windows on my MacBook Air, so I installed VMware and have Windows 10 running. As a bonus, it runs the Vista 3270 emulator just swell. :) In article you wrote: > Or Mac?

Re: IBM GRS Monitor report

It's a long story. But yes we are doing this. The ACDS, COMMDS, and SCDS are not shared. The second system's ACDS and SCDS were derived from the first system's ACDS and SCDS. It was our thinking, perhaps we are wrong, that hardware reserves would protect the integrity of the volume. Using

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

For those looking for a client based solution, there is also Syspertec's VIRTEL Web Access offering. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message:

Re: Finally joined Linkedin

Glad to hear from you, Shmuel! Welcome back. I hope you are well. Bob -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 4:23 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Finally joined

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

On 11/22/2017 3:57 AM, Dave Wade wrote: P.S. does VISTA support the PCOMM API's No... -- Phoenix Software International Edward E. Jaffe 831 Parkview Drive North El Segundo, CA 90245 http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ -- For

Re: IBM GRS Monitor report

I must not have had enough coffee, you said you share an SMS managed volume between two systems but they are no in the same plex? is the SMS ACDS and SCDS shared? how do you manage to use RESERVES to manage this volume if not in a GRS environment? MIM? Carmen - Original Message

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

On 11/22/2017 12:51 AM, David Crayford wrote: On 22/11/2017 1:36 PM, Jack J. Woehr wrote: On 11/21/2017 8:44 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: Two words. Vista TN3270. One word: x3270 There's not much choice on Linux. x3270 is full of bugs and not well maintained. What we need is more

Re: Shocking Bug in Latest PCOMM Release

I guess it depends on which foot the zero applies to. Most 3270 emulators are "zero host footprint" assuming you count TN3270 as a given. Otherwise, I guess IRMA and CLEO and so forth would be the only zero host footprint emulators. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe

Re: CF REPORT

Subchannel activity (report 2) includes all (roughly 18 million) requests from the indicated source system to the CF, whereas structure activity (report 3) only includes the (roughly 8 million) requests targeted to the indicated structure. 12 million delayed out of all 18 million requests to

Re: IBM GRS Monitor report

There is no safe way to do this with the use of *RESERVE* (or CA-MIM). This is the source of you VTOC errors, etc. USE RNLDEF RNL(EXCL) for relevant QNAME, RNAME, and Volume. Suggested Queues are SYSVTOC, SYSZVVDS as a minimum. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

AW: Re: CF REPORT

>But but there are other causes for delay (such as dump serialization) that >could be factors. Apart from dump serialization, what else? CPU constraints in the CF? CF internal serialization? -- Peter Hunkeler -- For IBM-MAIN

Re: IBM GRS Monitor report

Yes -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Allan Staller Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 11:05 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM GRS Monitor report [External Email] Are you sharing the volume across

Re: doubt on catalog

I’m still fuzzy on what problem you're trying to solve, but I want to observe that there is nothing inherently system intrinsic in a catalog, even a master catalog. Any catalog can be master if you name it at IPL time. Any catalog can be a user catalog if you treat it as such. In fact, one

Re: IBM GRS Monitor report

You only get to update such volumes from one system. > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] > On Behalf Of Allan Staller > Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 8:18 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: IBM GRS Monitor report

Re: IBM GRS Monitor report

Are you sharing the volume across sysplex boundaries? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of PINION, RICHARD W. Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 9:30 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: IBM GRS Monitor report We ran

Re: doubt on catalog

Please clarify. Here you say the same disk file. This implies a single disk volume accessible to either system (not necessarily simultaneously). Previously you said you performed a volume transfer which implies there are two volumes (possibly with the same name), each