Peter Sylvester wrote, in part:
>There is a difference between what you must set and what you must
>verify. 5280/3280 is clear (IMO) about that.
>when you verify a cert, AND you know about the extension, you just
>verify the extension and don't care about the critical bit
>Since the error
I recommend Prycroft's REVIEW which displays Program Management version
(column V below)
SYS1.SIEALNKE Row 1 of
188
Command ===>Scroll ===>
CS
RealName Alias-Name Size AC AMd At RU V
Can anybody cite some good sources to cite for dynamic UCBs? ideally it should
be a secondary source, due to wiki policy, and not assume to much background.
If there's a concise definition that I can quote in the citation, that would be
great.
I want to reinstate the material dropped by edit
IEBCOPY is the right tool for the program objects that can be converted. There
re z/OS facilities that won't work with load modules.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
From:
On 6/9/2021 7:19 AM, Rob Scott wrote:
Response from HLASM Development (Thanks Jonathan Scott) :
If an input exit supplies the record (which happens in this case, even if the
record is unchanged), the source record number information for error message
purposes (which may be different from the
There were different situations.
First of all, a co-worker on the project (from Kyndryl) helped us by
identifying the modules which were in trouble.
I guess he used special traces or performance reports; don't know which
sort of reports exactly. But he found
the SIIS hits somehow.
Then, when
On 12/9/2023 5:24 AM, Steve Estle wrote:
Seasons Greetings all,
I know this might sound like a strange request, but we are exploring what if any options
there are to migrate load libraries from PDSE (version 1 or 2) back to traditional basic
PDS's. It appears this is highly restricted based
On Sat, 9 Dec 2023 12:17:01 +0100, Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
>
>there is no such option;
>this is not possible, because with ASSEMBLER, the programmer has full
>control about where he or she puts the information elements,
>be it static data or code. There is no magic engine like the optimizer
>with
Limits are based on what compiler you used. Cobol 5+ uses PDSE features
that can't be moved into a PDS.
On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 7:24 AM Steve Estle wrote:
> Seasons Greetings all,
>
> I know this might sound like a strange request, but we are exploring what
> if any options there are to migrate
Putting DS and modified DCs into a separate area?
On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 5:17 AM Bernd Oppolzer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there is no such option;
> this is not possible, because with ASSEMBLER, the programmer has full
> control about where he or she puts the information elements,
> be it static data or
The ADRDSSU COPY command with the CONVERT option will do what you're looking
for.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com
On Saturday, December 9th, 2023 at 8:24 AM, Steve Estle
Seasons Greetings all,
I know this might sound like a strange request, but we are exploring what if
any options there are to migrate load libraries from PDSE (version 1 or 2) back
to traditional basic PDS's. It appears this is highly restricted based on my
experiences trying to perform via
On 08/12/2023 17:36, Phil Smith III wrote:
(Cross-posted to IBM-MAIN and IBMTCP-L)
Our z/OS product acts as a client to our non-z/OS server. As such, it makes TLS
connections to fetch Policy and keys.
As I've written previously, we had a problem when we added TLSv1.3 support to
the z/OS
Hi,
there is no such option;
this is not possible, because with ASSEMBLER, the programmer has full
control about where he or she puts the information elements,
be it static data or code. There is no magic engine like the optimizer
with compilers which can do anything about that.
This said:
14 matches
Mail list logo
