W dniu 2012-09-01 00:33, Ken Hume, IBM pisze:
Wow I took some programming classes when I was there in late 70's
early 80's.
What was it replaced with? 656,445,689,854,332 AIX servers?
couldn't resist
No, with *one* blade cabinet of Dell+Windows. HW cost comparable to
spare HMC and two
I have only the basics so far:
get_msg call ceemget,(cond,msg,msgptr,fc),vl,mf=(e,callprms)
cli fc_sev,1 bad fc if sev 1
jh badmsgfc
exec cics write operator text(msg) textlength(l'msg)
r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl (R.S.) writes:
No, with *one* blade cabinet of Dell+Windows. HW cost comparable to
spare HMC and two OSA cards.
as mentioned before:
max. configured z196 with 80 processors is rated at 50BIPs and goes for
$28M ($350,000/processor, $560,000/BIPS,
Clark,
I seriously doubt COBOL is on a deathbed considering how java performs on a
z/os.
Secondly, a serious amount of banking is on legacy machines in COBOL.
Banks aren't going to convert if it costs more money
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
On Aug 31, 2012, at 7:39 PM, Clark Morris
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-how-the-nasdaq-got-hacked-20120830,0,3152687.story
--
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Indeed. The lack of improvements for EC12 may simply reflect where the
COBOL folks are in their release cycle -- maybe they missed the window, and
it's coming later. Or not.
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
Clark,
I seriously doubt COBOL is on a
IIRC, both C and PL/I use the same back end code generator, while COBOL
does its own thing. That may be why COBOL seems to stay behind them.
On Sep 1, 2012 2:49 PM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed. The lack of improvements for EC12 may simply reflect where the
COBOL folks are in their
John,
With what heard about the Java performance hit, it's relativity a slow
performer.
What I see of C it's ok but, the documentation, good examples are lacking.
The data types especial strings with z/os bring different than UnixI know
these languages are evolving, my comments are negative
Sorry, what I was trying say was that Java is a slow performer and C of Z/os
outside Unix System Services is awkward based on examples I have seen and used.
Where COBOL and Assembler don't suffer from these inadequacies. The are more
seasoned languages
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
On Sep
Does IBM know about this:
http://www.goodbed.com/mattress-line/serta-iseries/
Surely iSeries was trademarked?! Of course, Monster Cable has/had a
zseries at the same time that IBM did. They owned the domain zseries.com,
although they never used it (it seems to be owned but not in use by a
On Sat, 1 Sep 2012 21:46:36 -0400, Doug wrote:
Gill Agreed!
HFS/zFS With DFDSS should be made to honor user allocation specifications
for data set restore.
No. I'll go further than that.
It should allocate as the primary extent the largest available
eligible extent.
It should allocate as the
11 matches
Mail list logo
