Jon Butler writes:
IFLs always run at full capacity based on the CEC model, e.g. zEC12 =
1511 MIPS, z196 = 1200, z114/z01 = 782.
zIIPs, zAAPs, ICFs, and SAPs are also whole engines. CPs often are whole
engines but optionally can be purchased and configured in fractional engine
increments -- which
Hello,
I have a 8 byte TOD string,generated by STCK marco, and want to use following
ICETOOL control statements to convert to readable format,is it correct?
HEADER('START DATE') ON(1,8,DC1,E'/99/99') -
HEADER('START TIME') ON(1,8,TC1,E'99:99:99')
The TOD string is CA91AE07.
Regards
Hi everybody,
we've been installing a new application using crypto facility calling services
like 'CSNBKEX' or 'CSNBKIM'.
We've done all the possible (in our understanding) to optimize the application,
so now we can measure more than 150 msg/second per single application server.
What does
Good Day All Readers,
Here is a question posed by Esmie. For some unknown reason she is not
receiving any posts from IBMMain.
Darren can you help?
Hi Willie,
Could you post this for me. I posted this question yesterday but for some
reason it doesn't show. Maybe you will have better
willie bunter wrote:
Here is a question posed by Esmie. For some unknown reason she is not
receiving any posts from IBMMain.
We all see her posts and replies on her problem. No problemo on IBM-MAIN
website.
Darren can you help?
Darren Evans-Young can't help for errors made by those yahoos.
Hello
That's true ZAAP and Java workloads can be run on ZIIP meeting the below..
The zAAP on zIIP capability is not available if z/OS is in an LPAR and
zAAPs are installed on the machine.
zIIP to CP ratio of no more than 1:1; the number of zIIPs cannot exceed the
number of CPs.
z/OS V1.11 and
Paul, in short, no.
The operating system runs on the underlying logical and physical hardware. So
if I have z/VM running in an LPAR that has only IFLs assigned logically to it,
z/OS will not be able to run. If I have a mix of IFLs and CPs in the LPAR,
then you can start up z/OS as a z/VM
Hmmm, strange, but Willie's e-mail address is also from yahoo.com and I can see
it on IBM-MAIN website.
But Esmie is from yahoo.ca, and I see also Victor's post from YAHOO.COM.CN
Ted is also from yahoo.ca (sometimes hijacked) and other one from yahoo.com.au,
etc.
Seemed some can come through
I'll just add one more comment...I really should read all the replies before
posting mine!
As Suresh and Timothy wrote, you can run zAAP workloads on zIIPs, if you don't
have any zAAPs installed. This is commonly called zAAP on zIIIP...I imagine
the vernacular will change as will the CPU
Victor,
Look at the discussion of the STCKCONV macro in volume 2 of the
Assembler Services Reference.
You are correct that the TOD value is an eight-byte one (as opposed to
the ETOD value, wh ich is a sixteen-byte one). The value you supply
is, however, only four bytes, eight hexadecimal
Are you setup as secure key or protected key?
Rob Schramm
Rob Schramm
Senior Systems Consultant
Imperium Group
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Massimo Biancucci mad4...@yahoo.comwrote:
Hi everybody,
we've been installing a new application using crypto facility calling
services like
W dniu 2013-04-18 15:15, Jon Butler pisze:
I'll just add one more comment...I really should read all the replies
before posting mine!
As Suresh and Timothy wrote, you can run zAAP workloads on zIIPs, if
you don't have any zAAPs installed. This is commonly called zAAP on
zIIIP...I imagine the
Massimo Biancucci wrote:
we've been installing a new application using crypto facility calling services
like 'CSNBKEX' or 'CSNBKIM'.
We've done all the possible (in our understanding) to optimize the
application, so now we can measure more than 150 msg/second per single
application server.
What
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
One of these days, I must submit an RCF asking for a clarification of whether
the returned value is GMT or LOCAL time (there is no option), and how it deals
with leap seconds and Daylight Saving boundaries that may exist between the
time of the STCK and the STCKCONV. I
That sounds like a place I worked back in the early 70's. 17th floor, stereo
hidden under the raised floor was brought out as soon as day shift left.
WWW.TXFB-INS.COM
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The foregoing message (including attachments) is
covered by the Electronic Communication Privacy
Has anyone complained yet about his response time's being too long?
Bill Fairchild
Franklin, TN
“Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder
acceptable, and to give the appearance of solidity to pure wind.” [George
Orwell]
- Original Message -
From:
Bob,
I'm very ignorant about the topic but your question lighted my steps :D !
Thanks a lot.
I asked my colleagues and, as I suppposed before, I think we're in the worst
case (that should be secure key).
What I think (and hope) is a crypto request to the CP I'm running on should
respond in
Gmail is a possible solution :)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Walt Farrell
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 7:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Fw: DFDSS PUZZLE - FILTERDD
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013
On behalf of Esmie and the kindness of Elardus, here is Esmie's question. She
cannot post it because she doesn't have access to ARCHIVE site
Good Morning Gentle Readers,
I am trying to perform a backup of 1,000 dsns using DFDSS. I have a syntax
error but I cannot find it. I checked the doc
Massimo Biancucci wrote:
we've been installing a new application using crypto facility calling services
like 'CSNBKEX' or 'CSNBKIM'.
We've done all the possible (in our understanding) to optimize the
application, so now we can measure more than 150 msg/second per single
application server.
What
Lizette,
Here's the input cards ESmie is using she cannot post because of lack of access:
//SYSINDD *
DUMP DATASET(FILTERDD(FILTER1)) -
OPT(4) ALLX ALLD(*) SPHERE OUTDD(TAPE1) -
TOL(ENQF)
I guess that the value of 8 for S42DSIOR (Average Response Time) , i.e 128ms X
8 = 1 second , is not good at all
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
Agree, the FILTERDD should only have one set of parens One Open and One Closed
So
Include(dsn1, -
Dsn2, -
DsnN)
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ulrich Krueger
Sent: Thursday,
I strongly suspect, without reading the doc, that ms should be microseconds
instead of milliseconds. I suspect this because of the multiplier 128. I
advise reading the SMF doc very closely. If it says the value is a number of
timer units, then you have to find out what a timer unit means.
I recognize that quote ... it's from my TechDoc WP100647 'A Clear Key / Secure
Key / Primer Key Primer' on the www.ibm.com/support/techdocs website. For more
(better) performance data I would refer you to the Crypto Performance
Whitepapers. They are available at:
This question has actually been asked by Esmie in two different threads with
similar subject lines.
The suggested answer has also been posted by Ulrich Krueger. To wit:
Willie,
It appears to me that there's one too many ) at the very end of the //FILTER1
DD - list.
And I do hope that the
I am on several yahoo groups. This happens from time to time and is
call the YAHOOTIES.
What is happening is there are a few yahoo servers that are not
forwarding messages. It usually hangs for 2-4 weeks, then someone
discovers messages are not going out, and they start rebooting the
affected
Also, have her try the OUTDD at the end of the command. Perhaps on a
separate line.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Willie Bunter williebun...@yahoo.com wrote:
Mike,
She tried your suggestion but she still gets the same error message.
--
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest
Etienne,
Actually, I am not. I really don't care which interface, ODBA, ODBM,
DBCTL, whatever, as long as I can call it from C to connect to IMS and do
DLI calls. Preferably without requiring other stuff to be configured.
AERTDLI() happens to be the only API that seems to actually do
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
One of these days, I must submit an RCF asking for a clarification of
whether
the returned value is GMT or LOCAL time (there is no option), and how it
deals
with leap seconds and Daylight Saving boundaries that may exist between
the
time of the STCK and the STCKCONV. I
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 18:57:10 -0500, George Kozakos wrote:
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
One of these days, I must submit an RCF asking for a clarification ...
I expect to be disappointed.
It's neither. It's the STCK time where
UTC = STCK - CVTLSO
LOCAL = STCK - CVTLSO + CVTLDTO
Let me anticipate
31 matches
Mail list logo
