Re: EXCP Counts in SMF Exit

2013-12-15 Thread Ed Finnell
Guess the curiosity is why it suddenly popped up? Longer run times, batch  
window, whatever-probably wouldn't hurt to look at EREP for temp or perm 
errors  on device and see if there are any data checks on the VOLSER. 
 
 
In a message dated 12/14/2013 6:21:51 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
charl...@mcn.org writes:

Great  idea. I played with Easy SMF once upon a time and found it very 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: EXCP Counts in SMF Exit

2013-12-15 Thread Skip Robinson
Based on the step level summary, there are lots of EXCPs:

+
| --TIMINGS (MINS.)--
| JOBNAME  STEPNAME PROCSTEPRC   EXCP   CONNTCBSRB  CLOCK
| CSSDCU01 CSSDCU01 STEP160 00 17820K  6089K   3.25.68  108.8
+

'17820K' or 17,8 million of them. What's missing is device level detail, 
including simple 'vanilla' I/O like STEPLIB. Regardless of how the utility 
itself does I/O, STEPLIB is accessed by Fetch. At least that DDNAME should 
be available. 

.
JO.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com



From:   Mark Zelden m...@mzelden.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU, 
Date:   12/14/2013 08:52 PM
Subject:Re: EXCP Counts in SMF Exit
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU



On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 11:39:10 -0800, Skip Robinson 
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com wrote:

Doesn't SDSF get the counts from SMF 30?   Assuming so, have you tried 
monitoring 
via SDSF to see what it reports while the step is running? 

Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS 
ITIL v3 Foundation Certified 
mailto:m...@mzelden.com 
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html 
Systems Programming expert at http://search390.techtarget.com/ateExperts/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: OMVS UID display

2013-12-15 Thread Robert S. Hansel (RSH)
Venkat,

Does this system have its own RACF database or does it share its database with 
other systems? If it shares its database, do commands like id display properly 
on those other systems?

What is the AIM level of this database? Run the following job to find out.
//jobname JOB (account),'username',CLASS=x,MSGCLASS=x
//STEP EXEC PGM=IRRIRA00
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*

If AIM is at level 0 or 1, is the UNIXMAP class active? Check SETROPTS LIST. If 
it is active, are there any UNIXMAP profiles? Execute SEARCH CLASS(UNIXMAP) to 
find out. Specifically, is there a profile U12345 in which your USERID is in 
the access list? Execute RLIST UNIXMAP U12345 ALL to check.

Regards, Bob

Robert S. Hansel
Lead RACF Specialist
RSH Consulting, Inc.
617-969-8211
www.linkedin.com/in/roberthansel
http://twitter.com/RSH_RACF
www.rshconsulting.com
-
2013-2014 RACF Training
- Audit  Compliance Roadmap - Boston - APR 22-25, 2014
- Intro  Basic Admin - WebEx - FEB 3-7, 2014
- Intro  Basic Admin - WebEx - JUN 9-13, 2014
- Securing z/OS UNIX  - WebEx - MAR 4-7, 2014
-

-Original Message-
Date:Sun, 15 Dec 2013 09:35:30 +0530
From:venkat kulkarni venkatkulkarn...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: OMVS UID display

Issue is only with this LPAR. I tried checking on other LPAR, all are fine.




On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 9:04 AM, venkat kulkarni venkatkulkarn...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 This issue is not with single user. I am facing this with all RACF users.



 On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Jon Perryman jperr...@pacbell.netwrote:

 I think that the first user assigned to OMVS UID 12345 was deleted, or
 it's OMVS segment was deleted or it was assigned to a new UID. My
 suggestion is that you modify the user to which you want displayed.

 Jon Perryman.

 
  From: venkat kulkarni venkatkulkarn...@gmail.com
 
 
 Hello,
  I have RACF id  associated with all UID and this problem is with
 all users anf getting *Error for uid.*
 I tried with many of the RACF user having diff access level and getting
 same issue even with UID 0 . I really don't think that my RACF is
 corrupted.
 
 
 Is there any other possibility.  Who am i command gives me
 RACFID@SYSNAME. I tried looking at many of the manual for this error
 but somehow failed.
 Still looking into maual.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: OMVS UID display

2013-12-15 Thread venkat kulkarni
Hello,
  We have 3 system in  plex and out of three systems, two are
running with z/OS 1.11 and one with z/OS 1.13. commands ( whoami ,id )
running on z/OS 1.11 running fine but on z/OS 1.13 system OMVS, these
command giving bad output.

I tried checking  RLIST UNIXMAP U12345 ALL  on z/OS 1.13 and found below
thing.


CLASS  NAME
-  
UNIXMAPU12345

LEVEL  OWNER  UNIVERSAL ACCESS  YOUR ACCESS  WARNING
-       ---  ---
 00VENKAT9 NONE   NONENO

INSTALLATION DATA
-
NONE

APPLICATION DATA

NONE

SECLEVEL

NO SECLEVEL

CATEGORIES
--
NO CATEGORIES

SECLABEL

NO SECLABEL

AUDITING

FAILURES(READ)
NOTIFY
--
NO USER TO BE NOTIFIED

CREATION DATE  LAST REFERENCE DATE  LAST CHANGE DATE
 (DAY) (YEAR)   (DAY) (YEAR)  (DAY) (YEAR)
-  ---  
  34713  34713 34713

ALTER COUNT   CONTROL COUNT   UPDATE COUNT   READ COUNT
---   -      --
  00 00 00 00

USER  ACCESS   ACCESS COUNT
  --   -- -
VENKAT   NONE00

   ID ACCESS  ACCESS COUNT  CLASS   ENTITY  NAME
 ---   
---
NO ENTRIES IN CONDITIONAL ACCESS LIST


On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Robert S. Hansel (RSH) 
r.han...@rshconsulting.com wrote:

 Venkat,

 Does this system have its own RACF database or does it share its database
 with other systems? If it shares its database, do commands like id display
 properly on those other systems?

 What is the AIM level of this database? Run the following job to find out.
 //jobname JOB (account),'username',CLASS=x,MSGCLASS=x
 //STEP EXEC PGM=IRRIRA00
 //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*

 If AIM is at level 0 or 1, is the UNIXMAP class active? Check SETROPTS
 LIST. If it is active, are there any UNIXMAP profiles? Execute SEARCH
 CLASS(UNIXMAP) to find out. Specifically, is there a profile U12345 in
 which your USERID is in the access list? Execute RLIST UNIXMAP U12345 ALL
 to check.

 Regards, Bob

 Robert S. Hansel
 Lead RACF Specialist
 RSH Consulting, Inc.
 617-969-8211
 www.linkedin.com/in/roberthansel
 http://twitter.com/RSH_RACF
 www.rshconsulting.com
 -
 2013-2014 RACF Training
 - Audit  Compliance Roadmap - Boston - APR 22-25, 2014
 - Intro  Basic Admin - WebEx - FEB 3-7, 2014
 - Intro  Basic Admin - WebEx - JUN 9-13, 2014
 - Securing z/OS UNIX  - WebEx - MAR 4-7, 2014
 -

 -Original Message-
 Date:Sun, 15 Dec 2013 09:35:30 +0530
 From:venkat kulkarni venkatkulkarn...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: OMVS UID display

 Issue is only with this LPAR. I tried checking on other LPAR, all are fine.




 On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 9:04 AM, venkat kulkarni 
 venkatkulkarn...@gmail.com
  wrote:

  This issue is not with single user. I am facing this with all RACF users.
 
 
 
  On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Jon Perryman jperr...@pacbell.net
 wrote:
 
  I think that the first user assigned to OMVS UID 12345 was deleted, or
  it's OMVS segment was deleted or it was assigned to a new UID. My
  suggestion is that you modify the user to which you want displayed.
 
  Jon Perryman.
 
  
   From: venkat kulkarni venkatkulkarn...@gmail.com
  
  
  Hello,
   I have RACF id  associated with all UID and this problem is
 with
  all users anf getting *Error for uid.*
  I tried with many of the RACF user having diff access level and getting
  same issue even with UID 0 . I really don't think that my RACF is
  corrupted.
  
  
  Is there any other possibility.  Who am i command gives me
  RACFID@SYSNAME. I tried looking at many of the manual for this error
  but somehow failed.
  Still looking into maual.

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: COBOL IN SRB Mode (Was Un-authorized caller)

2013-12-15 Thread Walt Farrell
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:38:54 -0600, Russ Teubner r...@hostbridge.com wrote:

As a result of writing this bit of infrastructure, I would offer the following 
observation:  The conceptual/theoretical 
discussions related to zIIP enablement and SRB authorization are interesting.  
However, the practical realities of getting LE 
and COBOL to work in this environment are a WHOLE different matter.  It's 
certainly not impossible, but it should be 
approached with great care.  

Additionally, running your own product's code in an SRB is one thing, but 
running general user-supplied code there has a very different set of security 
and integrity concerns.

-- 
Walt

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: OMVS UID display

2013-12-15 Thread venkat kulkarni
IRR66017I The system is currently operating in stage 1.


On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:54 PM, venkat kulkarni venkatkulkarn...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Hello,
   We have 3 system in  plex and out of three systems, two are
 running with z/OS 1.11 and one with z/OS 1.13. commands ( whoami ,id )
 running on z/OS 1.11 running fine but on z/OS 1.13 system OMVS, these
 command giving bad output.

 I tried checking  RLIST UNIXMAP U12345 ALL  on z/OS 1.13 and found below
 thing.


 CLASS  NAME
 -  
 UNIXMAPU12345

 LEVEL  OWNER  UNIVERSAL ACCESS  YOUR ACCESS  WARNING
 -       ---  ---
  00VENKAT9 NONE   NONENO

 INSTALLATION DATA
 -
 NONE

 APPLICATION DATA
 
 NONE

 SECLEVEL
 
 NO SECLEVEL

 CATEGORIES
 --
 NO CATEGORIES

 SECLABEL
 
 NO SECLABEL

 AUDITING
 
 FAILURES(READ)
 NOTIFY
 --
 NO USER TO BE NOTIFIED

 CREATION DATE  LAST REFERENCE DATE  LAST CHANGE DATE
  (DAY) (YEAR)   (DAY) (YEAR)  (DAY) (YEAR)
 -  ---  
   34713  34713 34713

 ALTER COUNT   CONTROL COUNT   UPDATE COUNT   READ COUNT
 ---   -      --
   00 00 00 00

 USER  ACCESS   ACCESS COUNT
   --   -- -
 VENKAT   NONE00

ID ACCESS  ACCESS COUNT  CLASS   ENTITY  NAME
  ---   
 ---
 NO ENTRIES IN CONDITIONAL ACCESS LIST


 On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Robert S. Hansel (RSH) 
 r.han...@rshconsulting.com wrote:

 Venkat,

 Does this system have its own RACF database or does it share its database
 with other systems? If it shares its database, do commands like id display
 properly on those other systems?

 What is the AIM level of this database? Run the following job to find out.
 //jobname JOB (account),'username',CLASS=x,MSGCLASS=x
 //STEP EXEC PGM=IRRIRA00
 //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*

 If AIM is at level 0 or 1, is the UNIXMAP class active? Check SETROPTS
 LIST. If it is active, are there any UNIXMAP profiles? Execute SEARCH
 CLASS(UNIXMAP) to find out. Specifically, is there a profile U12345 in
 which your USERID is in the access list? Execute RLIST UNIXMAP U12345 ALL
 to check.

 Regards, Bob

 Robert S. Hansel
 Lead RACF Specialist
 RSH Consulting, Inc.
 617-969-8211
 www.linkedin.com/in/roberthansel
 http://twitter.com/RSH_RACF
 www.rshconsulting.com
 -
 2013-2014 RACF Training
 - Audit  Compliance Roadmap - Boston - APR 22-25, 2014
 - Intro  Basic Admin - WebEx - FEB 3-7, 2014
 - Intro  Basic Admin - WebEx - JUN 9-13, 2014
 - Securing z/OS UNIX  - WebEx - MAR 4-7, 2014
 -

 -Original Message-
 Date:Sun, 15 Dec 2013 09:35:30 +0530
 From:venkat kulkarni venkatkulkarn...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: OMVS UID display

 Issue is only with this LPAR. I tried checking on other LPAR, all are
 fine.




 On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 9:04 AM, venkat kulkarni 
 venkatkulkarn...@gmail.com
  wrote:

  This issue is not with single user. I am facing this with all RACF
 users.
 
 
 
  On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Jon Perryman jperr...@pacbell.net
 wrote:
 
  I think that the first user assigned to OMVS UID 12345 was deleted, or
  it's OMVS segment was deleted or it was assigned to a new UID. My
  suggestion is that you modify the user to which you want displayed.
 
  Jon Perryman.
 
  
   From: venkat kulkarni venkatkulkarn...@gmail.com
  
  
  Hello,
   I have RACF id  associated with all UID and this problem is
 with
  all users anf getting *Error for uid.*
  I tried with many of the RACF user having diff access level and
 getting
  same issue even with UID 0 . I really don't think that my RACF is
  corrupted.
  
  
  Is there any other possibility.  Who am i command gives me
  RACFID@SYSNAME. I tried looking at many of the manual for this error
  but somehow failed.
  Still looking into maual.

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: OMVS UID display

2013-12-15 Thread Scott Ford
Venkat,

He system I work on is 1.13 no changes..vanilla out of the box...displays 
whoami fine ..
How are the racf omvs segment defined, is it different from the system that 
works vs the one that fails ? Something is different ...

Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD

'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'


 On Dec 15, 2013, at 9:41 AM, venkat kulkarni venkatkulkarn...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 
 IRR66017I The system is currently operating in stage 1.
 
 
 On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:54 PM, venkat kulkarni venkatkulkarn...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 Hello,
  We have 3 system in  plex and out of three systems, two are
 running with z/OS 1.11 and one with z/OS 1.13. commands ( whoami ,id )
 running on z/OS 1.11 running fine but on z/OS 1.13 system OMVS, these
 command giving bad output.
 
 I tried checking  RLIST UNIXMAP U12345 ALL  on z/OS 1.13 and found below
 thing.
 
 
 CLASS  NAME
 -  
 UNIXMAPU12345
 
 LEVEL  OWNER  UNIVERSAL ACCESS  YOUR ACCESS  WARNING
 -       ---  ---
 00VENKAT9 NONE   NONENO
 
 INSTALLATION DATA
 -
 NONE
 
 APPLICATION DATA
 
 NONE
 
 SECLEVEL
 
 NO SECLEVEL
 
 CATEGORIES
 --
 NO CATEGORIES
 
 SECLABEL
 
 NO SECLABEL
 
 AUDITING
 
 FAILURES(READ)
 NOTIFY
 --
 NO USER TO BE NOTIFIED
 
 CREATION DATE  LAST REFERENCE DATE  LAST CHANGE DATE
 (DAY) (YEAR)   (DAY) (YEAR)  (DAY) (YEAR)
 -  ---  
  34713  34713 34713
 
 ALTER COUNT   CONTROL COUNT   UPDATE COUNT   READ COUNT
 ---   -      --
  00 00 00 00
 
 USER  ACCESS   ACCESS COUNT
   --   -- -
 VENKAT   NONE00
 
   ID ACCESS  ACCESS COUNT  CLASS   ENTITY  NAME
  ---   
 ---
 NO ENTRIES IN CONDITIONAL ACCESS LIST
 
 
 On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Robert S. Hansel (RSH) 
 r.han...@rshconsulting.com wrote:
 
 Venkat,
 
 Does this system have its own RACF database or does it share its database
 with other systems? If it shares its database, do commands like id display
 properly on those other systems?
 
 What is the AIM level of this database? Run the following job to find out.
 //jobname JOB (account),'username',CLASS=x,MSGCLASS=x
 //STEP EXEC PGM=IRRIRA00
 //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
 
 If AIM is at level 0 or 1, is the UNIXMAP class active? Check SETROPTS
 LIST. If it is active, are there any UNIXMAP profiles? Execute SEARCH
 CLASS(UNIXMAP) to find out. Specifically, is there a profile U12345 in
 which your USERID is in the access list? Execute RLIST UNIXMAP U12345 ALL
 to check.
 
 Regards, Bob
 
 Robert S. Hansel
 Lead RACF Specialist
 RSH Consulting, Inc.
 617-969-8211
 www.linkedin.com/in/roberthansel
 http://twitter.com/RSH_RACF
 www.rshconsulting.com
 -
 2013-2014 RACF Training
 - Audit  Compliance Roadmap - Boston - APR 22-25, 2014
 - Intro  Basic Admin - WebEx - FEB 3-7, 2014
 - Intro  Basic Admin - WebEx - JUN 9-13, 2014
 - Securing z/OS UNIX  - WebEx - MAR 4-7, 2014
 -
 
 -Original Message-
 Date:Sun, 15 Dec 2013 09:35:30 +0530
 From:venkat kulkarni venkatkulkarn...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: OMVS UID display
 
 Issue is only with this LPAR. I tried checking on other LPAR, all are
 fine.
 
 
 
 
 On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 9:04 AM, venkat kulkarni 
 venkatkulkarn...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 This issue is not with single user. I am facing this with all RACF
 users.
 
 
 
 On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Jon Perryman jperr...@pacbell.net
 wrote:
 
 I think that the first user assigned to OMVS UID 12345 was deleted, or
 it's OMVS segment was deleted or it was assigned to a new UID. My
 suggestion is that you modify the user to which you want displayed.
 
 Jon Perryman.
 
 
 From: venkat kulkarni venkatkulkarn...@gmail.com
 
 
 Hello,
I have RACF id  associated with all UID and this problem is
 with
 all users anf getting *Error for uid.*
 I tried with many of the RACF user having diff access level and
 getting
 same issue even with UID 0 . I really don't think that my RACF is
 corrupted.
 
 
 Is there any other possibility.  Who am i command gives me
 RACFID@SYSNAME. I tried looking at many of the manual for this error
 but somehow failed.
 Still looking into maual.
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access 

Re: OMVS UID display

2013-12-15 Thread John McKown
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 4:24 AM, venkat kulkarni venkatkulkarn...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Hello,
   We have 3 system in  plex and out of three systems, two are
 running with z/OS 1.11 and one with z/OS 1.13. commands ( whoami ,id )
 running on z/OS 1.11 running fine but on z/OS 1.13 system OMVS, these
 command giving bad output.


snip

Based just on the above, is the z/OS 1.13 system in the same GRSplex as the
other systems? Why?
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/ichza2c0/4.9
quote
If your shared RACF database is at application identity mapping
(*AIM*)level 1 or higher, all systems that update the OMVS segment of
USER or
GROUP profiles, or update the ALIAS segment of general resource profiles
(for example, any SERVAUTH class profile), or run RACF utilities, should
have global resource serialization connections between the systems, should
be in the same global resource serialization complex, and should be running
OS/390 release 10 or any z/OS release. Adding or deleting a profile that
has any of these segments, altering these segments, or running RACF
utilities from a system outside the global resource serialization complex
might result in incorrect results; for example, an alias index entry for an
OMVS UID or SERVAUTH alias might point to the wrong profile, or to one that
does not exist. To prevent database sharing errors, it might be useful to
use RACF program control to restrict access to all RACF commands that can
update these segments, to ensure that they cannot be used from systems
outside a single global resource serialization complex.
/quote

Also, I found a curious phrase here, towards the bottom of the page :
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/ichza7c0/17.2.1
quote
For installations at *AIM* stage 2 or higher, you can list a set of users
or groups with a specific UID or GID, for example using '223' for the UID
value and '55' for the GID value, enter:

 SEARCH CLASS(USER) UID(223)
 SEARCH CLASS(GROUP) GID(55)

/quote

This is in the z/OS 1.13 manual. And it says that you can do a SEARCH for a
UID or GID at AIM level 2 or higher. But does not mention exactly what
happens at AIM 1 (your level) or lower. I wonder it the z/OS UNIX command
you are using has a similar restriction. I don't know. I'm still looking.

Looking in the UNIX manuals, I would _guess_ that these commands use the
UNIX program, BPX1GPU, to get the information. This, in turn, uses the RACF
callable service IRRSUM00 (aka GetUMAP). If this has some problem, it
writes a LOGREC record, per
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/ichzb2c0/2.4.1 .
If worse comes to worse, you might want to dump and print an EREP report
quickly after a failure to see if RACF has written any error information.


I can't really figure out exactly what the problem is. But I will say that
it would be __extremely advantageous__ for you to see about upgrading your
RACF database from AIM 1 to AIM 3. Most of the new facilities and speed
ups, especially in UNIX, require an AIM level of 3. It was very easy for
me. But that's because I had a very well controlled UNIX environment and
few users when I went from AIM 0 to AIM 3. It only took me about 3 weeks,
and that was only because I wanted to got to AIM level n, then wait a
week, before going to AIM level n+1. I have no problem occur due to this.

-- 
This is clearly another case of too many mad scientists, and not enough
hunchbacks.

Maranatha! 
John McKown

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


The NSA is coming to town

2013-12-15 Thread Mike Schwab
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pcWlyUu8U4


-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: OMVS UID display

2013-12-15 Thread Walt Farrell
On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 20:11:27 +0530, venkat kulkarni 
venkatkulkarn...@gmail.com wrote:

IRR66017I The system is currently operating in stage 1.



If you're at AIM stage 1, then you need to consider whether you have the 
UNIXMAP class active, and if so whether the UNIXMAP profiles are correct and 
complete. If UNIXMAP is active, but the profiles are not correct/complete, you 
can easily get errors like you're reporting.

By the way, I don't think you've said whether the z/OS 1.13 system shares the 
RACF database with your other systems. My guess is that it does not, and that 
your UNIXMAP profiles are not correct.

-- 
Walt

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: COBOL IN SRB Mode (Was Un-authorized caller)

2013-12-15 Thread Russ Teubner
Hi John,  

Your comment is wise:  Just because you can do something doesn't mean it's 
worth doing.  This is a great summary of our quest to zIIP enable a bit of our 
COBOL code.  Of course, this also means you have to do your homework because it 
may just turn out that, in some cases, it's *definitely* worth it.  A System z 
ISV in this day and age can't afford to miss those cases (at least that's my 
philosophy).

For example, zIIP enabling our core HostBridge products, Base and JSE (our 
CICS-based JavaScript Engine), was a no-brainer  Likewise with HB Socket 
Support (zIIP-enabled EZASOKET alternative).  On the other hand, our COBOL/BMS 
utility transactions???  Not so much.  

I must add that this break-even assessment is a moving target because zOS 
processor switching overhead seems to be trending down (and our own code paths 
are getting shorter). Note also that the model of the System z hardware makes a 
big difference.  If the GPs are knee-capped relative to the zIIPs, the GP 
savings and potential improvement in throughput are staggering in some cases.

Russ Teubner
HostBridge Technology

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN