I always thought it was a relay.
-teD
Original Message
From: Ed Finnell
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 01:17
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: the Queen of Coding - Adm. Grace Hoper
Chicken fried moth between the vacuum tubes.
In a message dat
Chicken fried moth between the vacuum tubes.
In a message dated 1/24/2016 11:43:56 P.M. Central Standard Time,
charl...@mcn.org writes:
Nope.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Lizette Koehler wrote:
Yes ESPN website Video is for Women in Computing in 1940s and specifically
the Queen of Coding Adm. Grace Hoper.
http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=12205119
Very sweet albeit distant gaze backwards through the glass darkly.
--
Jack J. Woehr # Science is mo
Nope.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Robert A. Rosenberg
Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2016 8:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: the Queen of Coding - Adm. Grace Hoper
At 17:53 -0700 on 01/24/2016, Li
At 21:01 -0600 on 01/24/2016, Joel C. Ewing wrote about Re: the Queen
of Coding - Adm. Grace Hoper:
I can't remember the exact way she worded it, but the other memorable
bit of wisdom was that she had successfully managed to accomplish so
much, despite government and military proclivity for red
At 17:53 -0700 on 01/24/2016, Lizette Koehler wrote about the Queen
of Coding - Adm. Grace Hoper:
Yes ESPN website Video is for Women in Computing in 1940¹s and
specifically
the Queen of Coding Adm. Grace Hoper.
http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=12205119
16 12 minutes. Very interes
On 01/24/2016 06:53 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
>
>
> Yes – ESPN website – Video is for Women in Computing in 1940’s and
> specifically
> the Queen of Coding – Adm. Grace Hoper.
>
> http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=12205119
>
>
>
> 16 ½ minutes. Very interesting history of computers.
>
>
>
Yes ESPN website Video is for Women in Computing in 1940s and specifically
the Queen of Coding Adm. Grace Hoper.
http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=12205119
16 ½ minutes. Very interesting history of computers.
Lizette Koehler
statistics: A precise and logical method for stating
Mark Post wrote:
Probably the same way the Linux 3270 console driver does it. It knows enough
to set the attribute byte for the field to be non-display.
Attended an IBM official SNA course in Phoenix in April, 1998 with a
retired-and-back-to-consult IBM'er.
He pointed out, "When you enter a
Guys,
Great articles, I learned BAL on a BPS360/20...
Brings back a lot of memories..
Scott
On Friday, January 22, 2016, Ed Finnell <
000248cce9f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Not nearly as unhappy as the Ops Mgr that found out they had replied "u"
> all 1000 times.
>
>
> In a m
>>> On 1/23/2016 at 01:54 PM, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Data point: Under 3270 OMVS, the "su" command properly masks the password.
> I wonder how it does that?
Probably the same way the Linux 3270 console driver does it. It knows enough
to set the
Thanks Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2016 12:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ShopZ
A quick search internet search came up with this. See if it can h
A quick search internet search came up with this. See if it can help from the
IBM web site
User guide, tutorials, etc.
http://www-304.ibm.com/software/shopzseries/ShopzSeries_public.wss
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Is anyone aware of a document that teaches/describes the how to use ShopZ that
I can give to someone that has
Never done SHopZ.
Steve
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@
ITchalk,
Yes sir
On Sunday, January 24, 2016, Scott Ford wrote:
> Rob,
>
> Great ! Ty sir
>
> Scott
>
> On Sunday, January 24, 2016, Rob Schramm > wrote:
>
>> Or write an auth routine to flip the non cancel bit off.
>>
>> Change the code and add the Stop command as the proper way to shut it
>>
000248cce9f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (Ed Finnell) writes:
> As Lynn mentioned there were hardware mods for ACP/TPF to the 3081, 3083
> and 3090's. They were given new numbers 9081,9083 and of course 9190? I guess
> shorter path lengths and such but couldn't find any details after a sh
Rob,
Great ! Ty sir
Scott
On Sunday, January 24, 2016, Rob Schramm wrote:
> Or write an auth routine to flip the non cancel bit off.
>
> Change the code and add the Stop command as the proper way to shut it
> down. Example on planetmvs
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016, 3:38 PM Rob Schramm > wrote:
>
It is my understanding that the main program is Cobol...
ITschak
ITschak Mugzach
Z/OS, ISV Products and Application Security & Risk Assessments Professional
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Rob Schramm wrote:
> Or write an auth routine to flip the non cancel bit off.
>
> Change the code and a
Or write an auth routine to flip the non cancel bit off.
Change the code and add the Stop command as the proper way to shut it
down. Example on planetmvs
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016, 3:38 PM Rob Schramm wrote:
> Restrict access to cancel the task and use automation to do the commands.
>
> On Sun, Ja
ITschak yes and I don't want to loose the secondary index, I thought if I
intercepted the S222 then I could save the secondary index to disk and then
come down normally, I am not sure this is why I posted the question..
Scott
On Sunday, January 24, 2016, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
> I think the int
Restrict access to cancel the task and use automation to do the commands.
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016, 3:36 PM Itschak Mugzach wrote:
> I think the intent was to protect from cancel by mistake. I believe that
> cancel is the way they stop the stc as well. This is why i proposed to have
> a special rec
I think the intent was to protect from cancel by mistake. I believe that
cancel is the way they stop the stc as well. This is why i proposed to have
a special record read from storage to stop the stc.
Best,
ITschak
ITschak Mugzach
Z/OS, ISV Products and Application Security & Risk Assessments Pro
Marking it non cancellable will prevent the normal cancel. But will not
stop the force arm.
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016, 3:26 PM Andy Wood wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:55:16 -0800, Charles Mills
> wrote:
>
> >It can be done but it is not easy. You don't actually need the front end
> (I think -- mo
On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:55:16 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
>It can be done but it is not easy. You don't actually need the front end (I
>think -- more familiar with C than COBOL). But it is not "supported." S122's
>are "unrecoverable."
>
I have no idea about either C or Cobol, but you can "inter
As Lynn mentioned there were hardware mods for ACP/TPF to the 3081, 3083
and 3090's. They were given new numbers 9081,9083 and of course 9190? I guess
shorter path lengths and such but couldn't find any details after a short
search.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_IBM_products
In
It can be done but it is not easy. You don't actually need the front end (I
think -- more familiar with C than COBOL). But it is not "supported." S122's
are "unrecoverable."
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Sc
Not Sure if this will work, but try adding the main program to PPT (schedxx
in parmlib) with NOCANCEL attribute. I wonder what will make the stc
shutdown, may be a record read from SP231 (stop run, may be)?
Best,
ITschak
ITschak Mugzach
Z/OS, ISV Products and Application Security & Risk Assessmen
All:
I have a scenario i would like to explain ...
1. Cobol STC , uses assembler module to read records that are placed in SP
231. The data is persistent.
This data is read into a secondary index for dup checking.
My issue is if someone issues a 'C stcname' the the customer can loose
data. M
Gregg wrote:
>ACP/TPF/zTPF on silicon/in LPar is one thing, as a guest on VM (test) is
>something other. No?
Um. No? Yes? Maybe? Are you saying that it has a different lineage when run
under z/VM? Then "No". That certain operational characteristics will vary?
Sure. But seriously-what's your
29 matches
Mail list logo
