Hello,
On book "Application Programmer Guide" appear the text:
"You can specify either an INCLUDE statement or an OMIT statement in the same
DFSORT run, but not both".
I read that before, but this is not really truth. Dfsort run correctly if I
write an INCLUDE and an OMIT like this examples:
I
Yeah - times have changed ... I remember back then when folks said I had a hot
baud too ... :(
Chris Hoelscher
Technology Architect, Database Infrastructure Services
Technology Solution Services
: humana.com
123 East Main Street
Louisville, KY 40202
Humana.com
(502) 714-8615, (502) 476-2538
>
harris...@gmail.com (Graham Harris) writes:
> Doesn't deadline scheduling count?
as undergraduate in the 60s, I did dynamic adaptive resource management
that was picked up and shipped in CP/67 (customers periodically referred
to as fairshare scheduler or wheeler scheduler because default policy
wa
t...@tombrennansoftware.com (Tom Brennan) writes:
> Yep - I'm hoping they'll like the batch facilities in MVS which in my
> opinion are far beyond unix. This might be a spot where a history
> lesson is needed, but I wasn't around in the early days:
>
> From what I've read, MVS started with nothing
I should have included the definitions, not just described them. There are no
decimal places, it is just two eight-digit integers, and two nine-digit
integers:
01 PICS9-8 COMP-3 PIC S9(8).
01 PICS9-8-2 COMP-3 PIC S9(8).
01 PICS9-9 COMP-3 P
Tom Brennan wrote
>
> cron tasks will be a problem I think, since a non-priviledged user can
> setup their own private "autocommands" on unix. Not so on the mainframe.
> But from what I've seen, unix people tend to want cron tasks because they
> are polling for data, which needs to be discouraged
Yep - I'm hoping they'll like the batch facilities in MVS which in my
opinion are far beyond unix. This might be a spot where a history
lesson is needed, but I wasn't around in the early days:
From what I've read, MVS started with nothing but batch jobs and later
grew into online systems. So
On 6 Feb 2016 17:30:16 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>Posting this to replace a post I made, by accident only in the
>google-something part of the list. Some editing, and additional examples.
>
>MOVE PICS9-9 TO PICS9-8
>D204 3010 3028 MVC 16(5,3),40(3) PICS9-8 PICS9-9
>9
Anne & Lynn Wheeler wrote:
Mandelbrot left IBM in 1987, after 35 years and 12 days, when IBM decided to
end pure research in his division.
When I was a contractor at IBM early in the Gerstner era, I had a not very intellectual but very funny, practical and
effective "lifer" IBM manager.
One
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (Paul Gilmartin) writes:
> (Topic drift on recreation) I found a fun Mandelbrot set viewer at:
other IBM Mandelbrot drift ... In the 80s, Mandelbrot resigned from IBM
Research in protest over the elimination of research.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
On 2016-02-07, at 08:38, R.S. wrote:
>
> ... nowadays I play with other kind of CPC's. You know the games: Power On
> Reset, Load, LPAR profile Customization, Load From Removable Media, etc. No
> Tetris, no Boulder Dash.
>
(Topic drift on recreation) I found a fun Mandelbrot set viewer at:
W dniu 2016-02-05 o 21:00, Elardus Engelbrecht pisze:
Lester, Bob wrote:
Commodore 64 anyone? :-)
Spectrum 48k, Commodore 64, Atari 64XE, Atari 800XL
The best machine was Amstrad CPC 6128 and I would challenge everyone who
do not agree. Swords, sabres, joysticks - what you choose
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:00:47 -0800, Tom Brennan wrote:
>
>I'm currently trying to write up some notes for some (possible) new
>mainframers who already know unix, and this is one of my comparisons:
>
>Unix Style:
>
>cat /etc/passwd | grep ^ted013: | awk -F':' '{print $3}'
>...
>JCL Style:
>
>//CA
>
>
>
> MOS Technology produced the KIM-1 (Keyboard Input Monitor) evaluation board
> for the 6502.
> It included a 6 digit,7-segment LED display, and a hex keypad, as well as a
> teletype interface
> and an audio cassette interface for storing and retrieving data. It had 2K of
> ROM with c
Page 459 of the publication
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg247946.pdf on paragraph "21.1.2
Local system area" says:=== Quote ===Note: A keyword has been added to the
IARV64 REQUEST=GETSTOR, LOCALSYSAREA=NO|YES, to indicate that the memory object
is to be allocated from the system a
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 16:02:52 -0600, Kirk Wolf wrote:
>I doubt that there is a significant difference in CPU resources between
>running the JVM in JZOS vs BPXBATC**.
I was surprised too.
>Perhaps the differences that you are seeing have to do with not measuring
>all of the address spaces?
That's
Yes, your interpretation is what I meant.
I was thinking the "branch prediction" would sort that out, but, probably
unreasonably, that thought assumes that most programmers make their definitions
large enough (and not overly large) to not have overflow, although on the other
hand even doing it
17 matches
Mail list logo