On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 23:22:18 -0500, Edward Gould wrote:
>> On Jun 9, 2016, at 7:08 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>>>
>>> I have just created this RFE, so you may or may not be able to vote on it.
>>> But
>>> when available, I hope you will vote for it
>>>
>>> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/e
> On Jun 9, 2016, at 7:08 PM, Paul Gilmartin
> <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> On 2016-06-09 17:20, Lizette Koehler wrote:
>> Cross posting to IBM Main and TSO-REXX
>>
>> I have just created this RFE, so you may or may not be able to vote on it.
>> But
>> when avail
This might be OTT, but I have used the following "JS" Clist edit macro
since the 1980's when submitting jobs to record when and from where (and
by whom) a job was submitted:
ISREDIT MACRO
CONTROL: +
CONTROL MAIN END(ENDO)
ISREDIT (DSN) = DATASET
ISREDIT (MEM) = MEMBER
IF &STR(&MEM) ¬= THEN
On 2016-06-09 17:20, Lizette Koehler wrote:
> Cross posting to IBM Main and TSO-REXX
>
> I have just created this RFE, so you may or may not be able to vote on it.
> But
> when available, I hope you will vote for it
>
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=89817
Cross posting to IBM Main and TSO-REXX
I have just created this RFE, so you may or may not be able to vote on it. But
when available, I hope you will vote for it
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=89817
This RFE is a request to enhance the DEL name MASK functio
The reason you didn't previously get an abend with the spaces is because the
records had unique keys. There is no actually SUMming for records with unique
keys.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
OK Lizette I'll try to explain this as best I can. Our current config consists
of a total of 3 DLMs. One has 6 vtes, another has four vtes, and yet another
has 2 vtes. Our new configuration will be 4 DLMs total. One DLM will be for
HSM only and consist of four VTEs(Non SMS). Another DLM wil
In article <296757c7-0092-4dc2-99c5-b56c748ae...@googlegroups.com> you wrote:
> Den fredag 11 september 2015 kl. 14:40:55 UTC+2 skrev Michael Knigge:
> > All,
> >
> > I?ve reimplemented the SWAREQ-Macro in Java (my ?template? was the well
> > known REXX from Gilbert Saint-Flour, see
> > https://
Kudos to Roland Schiradin author of CBT file 321. Program worked nicely and
help me identify load modules to review for our COBOL 5.2 migration.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lis
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Pfister, Nathan
> Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 10:45 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: DFSORT Question
>
> We have a sort on a file with LRECL 80 that is FB.
>
> The sor
Nathan,
For SUM processing, 0 through 9 for the sign or A through F for a digit
results in a data exception (0C7 ABEND). For example, a ZD value such as
3.5 (X'F34BF5') results in an 0C7 because B is treated as an invalid
digit. You can use ICETOOL's DISPLAY or VERIFY operator can be used to
We have a sort on a file with LRECL 80 that is FB.
The sort statements are as follows:
SORT FIELDS=(1,35,A,44,37,A),FORMAT=CH
SUM FIELDS=(36,8,ZD)
This failed last night for the first time with a S0C7, and the applications
team asked me to look at it. I started looking at it and, not being the
I will check it out, thanks.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
OP's question suggests to me that an IODF will be shared outside the realm of
one master catalog. We've had discussions here in the past about the practice
of sharing an IODF across sysplex boundaries--which I equate with master
catalog boundaries. We have never shared IODF that way. Each sysple
CBT file 321, COBANAL will scan all the compiler option bits in the load
library member and tell you what it found if it knows the version of the
compiler. I'm pretty sure it supports VS VOBOL II, so that should get you the
answers you need.
It will also identify the compiler and version used
Thank you all for your help, we found that the server needed a setting modified.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Kirk Wolf
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 9:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SFTP Compr
I do not have anything to add, but wish to thank those who answered to this
topic because I have learned something that relates directly to something I am
having to maintain right now.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archi
Here is one more thing the ECB has to be
One a FULLWORD boundary I had a XL4
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 9, 2016, at 10:16 AM, Zahir Hemini wrote:
>
> I do not have anything to add, but wish to thank those who answered to this
> topic because I have learned something that relates directly
Upgraded to version 3.6.3 and still not seeing compression messages, are there
other mvs system or Zos unix requirements that maybe we do not have in place?
Thanks Matt
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Kirk Wolf
Sent:
We are upgrading to COBOL 5.2 and need to identify VS COBOL II compiled with
NORES within our load libraries. Is there a string that I can scan for to
identify these programs?
I am already identifying OS/VS COBOL programs by scanning for the compiler
eye-catcher: 5740CB103
Thanks, but on version Co:Z SFTP version: 2.4.4, I did not get the messages
'debug1: compress outgoing: raw data'. I did not get any messages about
compression.
In the process of upgrading to version 3.6.3 to see if that makes a difference.
Below is may settings.
$coz_bin/cozsftp $ssh_opts -b
Thank you so much to all.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Edgard Balter Jr. wrote:
> Nathan,
>
> //RECATALG EXEC PGM=IDCAMS
> //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
> //SYSINDD *
> DEFINE CLUSTER(NAME(SYS1.IODF00.CLUSTER)-
> RECATALOG-
>
Nathan,
//RECATALG EXEC PGM=IDCAMS
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSINDD *
DEFINE CLUSTER(NAME(SYS1.IODF00.CLUSTER)-
RECATALOG-
LINEAR) -
DATA(NAME(SYS1.IODF00)-
Marc is correct.
Also, if you have z/OS V2R2 OpenSSH and a zEDC card, you can do this:
cozsftp -C -ozEDCCompression=yes user@host
(you would have to authorize the user to use zEDC using SAF/RACF)
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 6:41 AM, Marc Manuel
Yes "-C" should work.
You can add "-vvv" to have sysout trace where you can find for example :
Co:Z SFTP version: 3.6.0 (6.4p1) 2015-12-08
Copyright (C) Dovetailed Technologies, LLC. 2008-2014. All rights reserved.
(.)
debug1: compress outgoing: raw data 105008594, compressed 1430152, factor
Hello,
I use this one :
//STEP0 EXEC PGM=IDCAMS
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//DD1 DD VOL=SER=ZZ9000,UNIT=3390,DISP=SHR
//SYSIN DD *
DEFINE CLUSTER (NAME(SYS1.IODF18.CLUSTER ) VOLUMES(ZZ9000) -
LINEAR -
RECATALOG) -
DATA(NAME(SYS1.IODF18 )) -
CATALOG(CATALOG.MCAT.ZOS210)
2016-06-09 11
Nathan Astle wrote:
Hello,
Can someone please share me a sample JCL on recataloging the IODF dataset ?
Did you try DEFINE RECATALOG?
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/dgt3i210.pdf
--
John Eells
IBM Poughkeepsie
ee...@us.ibm.com
---
Hello,
Can someone please share me a sample JCL on recataloging the IODF dataset ?
Regards
Nathan
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO I
If the job came through the INTRDR from TSO the exit will see it, if it comes
via a scheduling product, then you already know where the JCL came from:) JOB
scheduling packages aren't all that smart about where they get the JCL from.
Plus I would imagine that every one of them has the capabilit
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 20:27:21 +0530, linda golding
wrote:
>Thanks Curt ... For shared DASD devices , UCW is same in HSA which is used
>to serialize when IO requests from multiple LPARS arrives to the same
>device .
>
>I was expecting something similar for console devices . But it appears that
>tha
30 matches
Mail list logo
