Re: REXX determine library that is executed from

Like Walt suggested, use the PARSE SOURCE function: /*rexx*/ parse source . . . dd dataset . say "DD name is " dd say "dataset name is " dataset On 20 November 2016 at 03:44, Paul Gilmartin < 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 19:36:41 -0600, Walt

Re: LDAP on z/os

Hello Paul, Yes, I think my requirement was not clear to all. Basically LDAP server is running on some Windows or Linux box and we want to integrate mainframe with that as LDAP client for any sort of login to mainframe can be tso, cics,db2 etc. Please suggest On Nov 20, 2016 05:24, "Paul

Re: LDAP on z/os

On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:00:53 +0800, Timothy Sipples wrote: >Venkat, the base z/OS operating systems includes a terrific Lightweight >Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) server at no additional charge. It >supports industry standard LDAP v3 protocols. You can configure it in a >variety of ways, but

Re: LDAP on z/os

Venkat, the base z/OS operating systems includes a terrific Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) server at no additional charge. It supports industry standard LDAP v3 protocols. You can configure it in a variety of ways, but if you want a simple, straightforward implementation that allows

Re: Which STEPLIB concatenation is not authorized?

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 16:05:08 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote: > >Hmmm. If I were to ALLOCATE a UNIX directory with DSORG=PS, >RECFM-F,LRECL=256; could I read it as a PDS directory? > No. And well documented; a limitation for strong technical reasons, unlike some arbitrary limitations z/OS imposes.

Re: REXX determine library that is executed from

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 19:36:41 -0600, Walt Farrell wrote: >On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 19:30:28 -0600, Donald Likens wrote: > >>Has anyone come up with a way for a REXX program to determine the library it >>resides in? > >Have you looked at the REXX parse source instruction? > To cite a recent statement

Re: REXX determine library that is executed from

What problem are you trying to solve? Also, if you were not aware, there is a TSO-REXX list that also might be helpful To join, if you have not done so Go to this Webpage and scroll to the bottom TSO REXXhttp://www2.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?TSO-REXX Lizette > -Original

Re: Invalid characters in JCL symbols passed to SYSIN within a PROC

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 18:47:55 -0600, Mike Schwab wrote: >If you use quotes, you can put in any character you want into a data >set name. If it uncataloged on a non-SMS volume, it will be created. >You don't even have to limit yourself to 8 characters between dots. > When I said "name", I didn't

Re: REXX determine library that is executed from

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 19:30:28 -0600, Donald Likens wrote: >Has anyone come up with a way for a REXX program to determine the library it >resides in? Have you looked at the REXX parse source instruction? -- Walt

REXX determine library that is executed from

Has anyone come up with a way for a REXX program to determine the library it resides in? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Invalid characters in JCL symbols passed to SYSIN within a PROC

If you use quotes, you can put in any character you want into a data set name. If it uncataloged on a non-SMS volume, it will be created. You don't even have to limit yourself to 8 characters between dots. On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Paul Gilmartin

Re: Which STEPLIB concatenation is not authorized?

On 18 November 2016 at 06:26, Charles Mills wrote: > As a software vendor, on new installs we often get customers saying "your > product puts out a message saying it is not authorized but we're sure we > authorized the library" and it is often a painful process taking them >

Re: Which STEPLIB concatenation is not authorized?

On 2016-11-19, at 15:32, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: > > As complicated this may sound, APF can be determined/diagnosed by inspection > with relative ease. It's not rocket surgery. > Perhaps. But it would be poor business practice for the OP to address his customer so tactlessly. IBM ought

Re: Which STEPLIB concatenation is not authorized?

APF is defined in SYS1.PARMLIB(PROGxx) according to the installation defined concatenation in IEASYSxx. The result of that concatenation determines the set of APF libraries unless modified after IPL by SETPROG APF. Entries in PROGxx are of two types: APF ADD DSN(dsn-1)

Re: Which STEPLIB concatenation is not authorized?

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 08:30:39 -0500, Peter Relson wrote: > >I assume that the subject of this thread should have been "Which data set >in the STEPLIB concatenation is not APF-authorized". > Me, too. And if that information were available the adress space could remain authorized as long as modules

Re: Sftp implementation

FWIW, Microsoft is working on a port of OpenSSH for Powershell. https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/powershell/2015/10/19/openssh-for-windows-update/ The lastest work-in-progress seems to be available here: https://github.com/PowerShell/Win32-OpenSSH Kirk Wolf Dovetailed Technologies

Re: Which STEPLIB concatenation is not authorized?

>Thanks, but you might want to read my OP >>There are various ways to check whether the current environment is APF authorized. >>For example, the TESTAUTH macro will give a return code to indicate >>APF or not. Charles, that response *was* an attempt to respond to a question of yours in your