Re: Friday!

2019-07-19 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 19:16:09 -0700, Tom Brennan wrote: >Simple: No > >Longer: I'll guess you're talking about clearing memory? I do seem to >remember writing code on a z80 to clear a section of bytes to zero, and >oops if I messed up it would keep writing zeros to 64K, wrap around to >zero, and

Re: FTP question

2019-07-19 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 21:10:19 -0400, CarlosM Martinez wrote: >I will have to take a look at the JCL. But it seems you are correct it is a >BATCH OS/MVS SFTP to UNIX. > So it isn't your JCL? >... >Would anyone know what 65280 return code from an FTP could be? >Command: >Sh rm -f -r /u/dmc/mvs/

Re: Friday!

2019-07-19 Thread Tom Brennan
Simple: No Longer: I'll guess you're talking about clearing memory? I do seem to remember writing code on a z80 to clear a section of bytes to zero, and oops if I messed up it would keep writing zeros to 64K, wrap around to zero, and then continue on until the zeros hit the instructions that

Re: FTP question

2019-07-19 Thread CarlosM Martinez
I will have to take a look at the JCL. But it seems you are correct it is a BATCH OS/MVS SFTP to UNIX. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 6:14 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subj

Friday!

2019-07-19 Thread Lester, Bob
Hi All, Who remembers how to "ripple core" on a 360/75J? Back in the day, I was taught that it "wrote un-digit zeros" to all storage locations (main + LCS) on the box. If course, an IPL was required after this was done. Not sure how widely it was used. A simple yes or no is OK i

Re: FTP question

2019-07-19 Thread Frank Swarbrick
Are you using the z/OS FTP client? It doesn't look like it. It looks like you are trying to invoke a Unix shell with the 'rm' command. Not something that FTP supports, as far as I know. From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of CarlosM Martinez Sent:

Re: DASD nostalgia

2019-07-19 Thread Lester, Bob
Hi Gabe, That sounds like the HPT (head-per-track) disk I worked with on a Burroughs 3500 & 4700 (?). Big mothers. As you said, and as I recall, it was one huge disk. Used to make the raised data center floor rattle some times! This would have been around 1980-82? Anothe

Re: FTP question

2019-07-19 Thread Charles Mills
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.halu001/ftpstret.htm Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of CarlosM Martinez Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 12:46 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.E

DASD nostalgia

2019-07-19 Thread Gabe Goldberg
I mentioned a while ago remembering a friend's long-ago story about disk head crashes at DEC, resolved by rotating drive cabinet so platters aligned with loading dock of old mill building (rather than rotating perpendicular to dock's orientation). Problem had been head crashes when trucks backe

Re: Reset condition codes?

2019-07-19 Thread Mark Jacobs
If you have access to ADRDSSU using it might be easier than your method. //JOB2 JOB accounting information,REGION=K //STEP1EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* //SYSIN DD * COPY - DS(INC(USER.PDS.**)) - LOGINDYNAM ( - (338001) - (338002)

Reset condition codes?

2019-07-19 Thread TenEyck, Peter
I wrote this job to convert a bunch of PDSs to PDSEs. I am using variable (ALTERRC) to "reset condition codes" for each invocation of the proc. It works. Is there a better way to do this? Maybe a way I could do something and then use the COND parameter on the COPY step? //PDS2PDSE JOB CLASS=S,M

Re: FTP question

2019-07-19 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 15:46:09 -0400, CarlosM Martinez wrote: > >Would anyone know what 65280 return code from an FTP could be? >Command: >Sh rm -f -r /u/dmc/mvs/sftp/20190719101931630131 >Failed with a return code 65280 > Is it significant that that's 0xff00? -- gil -

FTP question

2019-07-19 Thread CarlosM Martinez
Sorry I sent this before with the wrong subject -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of CarlosM Martinez Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 3:05 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SDSF initial display and z/OS 2.3 Hello ;

Re: SDSF initial display and z/OS 2.3

2019-07-19 Thread CarlosM Martinez
Hello ; Would anyone know what 65280 return code from an FTP could be? Command: Sh rm -f -r /u/dmc/mvs/sftp/20190719101931630131 Failed with a return code 65280 Thank you all Newbe to MVS Carlos Martinez SUNY -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LIST

Re: Abend entry LE Assembler Has to so with :> " WHILE RUNNING PROGRAM EQA10OSM WHICH STARTS AT 0002E138"

2019-07-19 Thread Doug Henry
In our linklst we have SEQABMOD and SEQAMOD. In our lpa we have SEQALPA. In our APF list we have SEQAAUTH, SEQABMOD, and SEQAMOD. Doug On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 14:22:26 -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote: >I think there are 4 load libraries of type >Hlq.SEQA that need to be in the linklist/APF > >I

Re: [EXTERNAL] SDSF initial display and z/OS 2.3

2019-07-19 Thread Carmen Vitullo
Thanks so much Paul, your suggestion works well, SDSF main menu looks 'normal' have a great weekend Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "Paul Feller" To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 10:13:49 AM Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] SDSF initial display and z/OS 2

Re: Abend entry LE Assembler Has to so with :> " WHILE RUNNING PROGRAM EQA10OSM WHICH STARTS AT 0002E138"

2019-07-19 Thread Joseph Reichman
I think there are 4 load libraries of type Hlq.SEQA that need to be in the linklist/APF I may have missed one Thanks > On Jul 19, 2019, at 2:19 PM, Doug Henry > <012e22efeed4-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > Language Environment requires some definitions to be preloaded, suc

Re: Abend entry LE Assembler Has to so with :> " WHILE RUNNING PROGRAM EQA10OSM WHICH STARTS AT 0002E138"

2019-07-19 Thread Doug Henry
Language Environment requires some definitions to be preloaded, such as the event handlers for Language Environment, which are named CEEEVnnn. CEEEV006 for Debug Tool. Doug On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 17:47:06 -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote: >This module is a CSECT in seems to be a LE module in debug

Re: SDSF initial display and z/OS 2.3

2019-07-19 Thread Carmen Vitullo
Hey Bob, IIRC that's what a lot of folks did on the ISPF Primary option until IBM started shipping the panel that way, I may be wrong, I've been wrong before :) thanks Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "Robert B. Richards" <01c91f408b9e-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>

Re: Dynamic LINKLIST impact

2019-07-19 Thread Tom Marchant
On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 10:47:14 -0500, Joel C. Ewing wrote: >The manner >in which services and address spaces were allowed to use LNKLST DCBs >should have been much better constrained so that those system processes >using a LNKLST DCB for any extended time were required to "register" >their active an

Re: [EXTERNAL] SDSF initial display and z/OS 2.3

2019-07-19 Thread Feller, Paul
First sorry about the miss type on the screen size. That's what I get for typing fast. It all comes down to the number of lines on the screen. With z/OS 2.3 SDSF there are additional options listed on the main screen. If you use the new default screen you can hit PF7/PF8 to scroll up/down to

Re: PDS compare

2019-07-19 Thread Charles Mills
Aliases? Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Bill Giannelli Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 7:02 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: PDS compare Thank you for your response! That works very easily! something

Re: [EXTERNAL] SDSF initial display and z/OS 2.3

2019-07-19 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 15:13:49 +, Feller, Paul wrote: >... You can’t hit PF8 to see the additional options. ... > Careless design; careless testing. But is there a published minimum required terminal geometry to support SDSF? -- gil --

Re: EQA10OSM

2019-07-19 Thread Ed Jaffe
On 7/18/2019 8:25 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote: Just by looking at the dataset names. Typically the AEQAMOD should be a DLIB dataset The SEQAMOD would be your TLIB. TLIBs would go into your live environment DLIB would only be used when an SMP/e ACCEPT is done. When did target libraries start be

Re: SDSF initial display and z/OS 2.3

2019-07-19 Thread Richards, Robert B.
Yes, if you can find the correct place to insert a .RESP=ENTER in panel logic of ISFPCU41 that will not cause issues. I took a fast look and would assume that after the "ABC" logic for the action bar stuff might be appropriate. I can't pursue this at the moment. Maybe a SDSF developer will chim

Re: Dynamic LINKLIST impact

2019-07-19 Thread Joel C. Ewing
Peter, I understand that you are coming from a much deeper understanding of the current internals of z/OS than the rest of us and from the standpoint of what would be practical to implement, but what you are basically saying is that the current design of LNKLST is flawed and difficult to adapt for

Re: [EXTERNAL] SDSF initial display and z/OS 2.3

2019-07-19 Thread Seymour J Metz
> model 4 (24x43) ITYM 43x80 What about model 5 (27x132)? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Feller, Paul Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 11:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subjec

Re: [EXTERNAL] SDSF initial display and z/OS 2.3

2019-07-19 Thread David Spiegel
Model 4 is 43x80. On 2019-07-19 11:13, Feller, Paul wrote: > There is a way to get back to the look that you see under z/OS 2.2. > Basically you need to allocate a dataset (temp or dummy) under the DD name > ISFMIGMN. The dataset needs to be allocated before you get into SDSF. There > seems

Re: [EXTERNAL] SDSF initial display and z/OS 2.3

2019-07-19 Thread Carmen Vitullo
That's interesting Paul, I may test that and migrate that to prod, if my users complain about the new look. I know we have some users that use 3270 emulator macros to perform some work, as you know, these macros are recorded from a screen image, if that screen image changes, the macro does not

Re: [EXTERNAL] SDSF initial display and z/OS 2.3

2019-07-19 Thread Feller, Paul
There is a way to get back to the look that you see under z/OS 2.2. Basically you need to allocate a dataset (temp or dummy) under the DD name ISFMIGMN. The dataset needs to be allocated before you get into SDSF. There seems to be one interesting issue with the default main screen in SDSF. W

Re: [EXTERNAL] SDSF initial display and z/OS 2.3

2019-07-19 Thread Carmen Vitullo
Thank you David, I'm re-reviewing the migration guide for any POST IPL migration items, I see a couple I need to address, and some, like the SDSF migration actions, I may or may not need to address, again thanks for the info ! Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "David Purdy

Re: [EXTERNAL] SDSF initial display and z/OS 2.3

2019-07-19 Thread David Purdy
Carmen, we had the same issue come up.  You can create a usermod to alter  panel ISFPCU41, or review the Migration from z/OS V2R2... manual section on SDSF:Modify programs that post-process SDSF panels.  Compatibility mode is discussed. Also, we found that the fewer SDSF selections available to

Re: EQA10OSM

2019-07-19 Thread Tom Marchant
On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 20:25:42 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote: >TLIBs would go into your live environment ITYM target libraries. TLIB means something different: SMPTLIB. -- Tom Marchant -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archiv

Re: PDS compare

2019-07-19 Thread John McKown
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 9:02 AM Bill Giannelli wrote: > Thank you for your response! > That works very easily! > something is still not making sense. > when I look at the information of each PDS one has 893 members the other > PDS has 585 members. > But the superce compare only shows a difference

Re: PDS compare

2019-07-19 Thread Bill Giannelli
Thank you for your response! That works very easily! something is still not making sense. when I look at the information of each PDS one has 893 members the other PDS has 585 members. But the superce compare only shows a difference of about 40 members. Bill ---

Re: EQA10OSM

2019-07-19 Thread Joseph Reichman
Thanks I know someone who is a sysprog And knows as SMP/e As I am a developer I’ll ask him for help Thanks > On Jul 19, 2019, at 7:59 AM, David Spiegel wrote: > > ACCEPT or RESTORE. > >> On 2019-07-18 23:25, Lizette Koehler wrote: >> Just by looking at the dataset names. >> >> Typica

Re: PDS compare

2019-07-19 Thread John McKown
I'd use ISPF "SuperCE", option 3.13 LIH1 SuperCE Utility Command ===> New DS Name . . . 'input.dsn.one(*)' Old DS Name . . . 'input.dsn.two(*)' PDS Member List* (blank/pattern - member list, * - compare all) (Leave New/Old DSN "blank" for concatenated-u

PDS compare

2019-07-19 Thread Bill Giannelli
I want to compare 2 PDS datasets and want to get a list of what members are missing. I do not want a line by line comparison of all the members. What is the best option to use? thanks Bill -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / a

Re: EQA10OSM

2019-07-19 Thread Lizette Koehler
My understanding is you only need the TLIBs available to your process. This may mean you put the TLIBs in the LINKLST, LPA List, Steplib etc... You would need the installation instructions to know where the TLIBs are to be placed. You would not include an DLIBs in the system. They are only fo

Re: Help wanted | Computerworld Shark Tank

2019-07-19 Thread scott Ford
What called a ‘purple squirrel’, John. Regards, Scott On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 8:47 AM John McKown wrote: > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 7:37 AM Mark Regan wrote: > > > Not directly mainframe related, but I think you will get the picture. > > Help wanted Looking for someone under 30 with 20+ years

Re: [EXTERNAL] SDSF initial display and z/OS 2.3

2019-07-19 Thread Carmen Vitullo
Thank you Jim, that does work and the logo never bothered me, but as you know any change to the looks or feel of any ISPF function gets 'some' users panties in a wad. If there's the ability to bypass the logo that would be great, again thanks Carmen Vitullo - Original Message -

Re: [EXTERNAL] SDSF initial display and z/OS 2.3

2019-07-19 Thread Horne, Jim - James S
I always go into SDSF with an option, i.e., SDSF.DA. If you do that, you don't see the pop-up Jim Horne -Original Message- Is it possible to bypass the logo pop-up in SDSF on z/OS 2.3 ? NOTICE: All information in and attached to the e-mails below may be

SDSF initial display and z/OS 2.3

2019-07-19 Thread Carmen Vitullo
Is it possible to bypass the logo pop-up in SDSF on z/OS 2.3 ? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Help wanted | Computerworld Shark Tank

2019-07-19 Thread John McKown
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 7:37 AM Mark Regan wrote: > Not directly mainframe related, but I think you will get the picture. > Help wanted Looking for someone under 30 with 20+ years of experience. > Nothing new. I don't remember the exact situation, but I do remember an add in the paper version of

How does HPE non-stop prev. Tandem do it was Re: Dynamic LINKLIST impact

2019-07-19 Thread Clark Morris
[Default] On 19 Jul 2019 04:46:06 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main rel...@us.ibm.com (Peter Relson) wrote: In looking at the below discussion, I am brought back to the question as to how HPE non-stop (started out as Tandem) manage the update process to avoid a shutdown. Even though it is UNIX based

Fwd: Help wanted | Computerworld Shark Tank

2019-07-19 Thread Mark Regan
Not directly mainframe related, but I think you will get the picture. Help wanted Looking for someone under 30 with 20+ years of experience. https://www.computerworld.com/article/3409061/help-wanted.html Mark Regan, K8MTR CTO1 USNR-Retired Nationwide Ins. Retired

Re: EQA10OSM

2019-07-19 Thread Joseph Reichman
I have the 2.3 ADCD it thought I could the Debug tool libraries in the APF list and have the SVC’s installed to have debug tool running It’s seems I have to run SMP/E correct ? > On Jul 19, 2019, at 7:59 AM, David Spiegel wrote: > > ACCEPT or RESTORE. > >> On 2019-07-18 23:25, Lizette K

Re: EQA10OSM

2019-07-19 Thread David Spiegel
ACCEPT  or RESTORE. On 2019-07-18 23:25, Lizette Koehler wrote: > Just by looking at the dataset names. > > Typically the AEQAMOD should be a DLIB dataset > The SEQAMOD would be your TLIB. > > TLIBs would go into your live environment > > DLIB would only be used when an SMP/e ACCEPT is done. > > L

Re: Dynamic LINKLIST impact

2019-07-19 Thread Peter Relson
If so, perhaps DELAY=255 should be the default. If not, why ever use it? That would never be done. This delays the completion of the command. It is not up to IBM to decide how long a customer can tolerate that. What is being deferred, in particular, is the closing of the old DCB and the free-i