I think zPDT if for IBM partner in development and zPD is for clients for
development only. ADCD is the installed operating systems and products
running on zPDT or zPD
ITschak
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 8:37 AM Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> ZPDT is the emulator that runs on x86 emulating z instructions,
ZPDT is the emulator that runs on x86 emulating z instructions, I/O, etc. ZD
is the collection of z/Software and tools to create those x86 based z/OS
instances.
Matt Hogstrom
m...@hogstrom.org
+1-919-656-0564
PGP Key: 0x90ECB270
Facebook LinkedIn
I'm new to z/OS in X86. What's the difference between zPDT and ZD? The
documentation I could find is not clear.
Looks like something that might be useful in the shop where I'm currently
working.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019, 9:01 AM Sebastian Welton wrote:
> I've run both zPDT and ZD succcessfully in
I've run both zPDT and ZD succcessfully in both AWS and Azure. In fact ZD,
if not PE (Personal Edition) only works with a remote license server although
all versions of zPDT and ZD will also work with a remote license server. ZD
EE (Enterprise Edition) does not allow for the use of a hardware
Kees, thank you. I see that would not work and it would be better to have both
systems down and IPL one at a time.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with
Two recent z/OS DFSMS Continuous Delivery projects:
- OA57454 Added DELETE (Archive) capability to HSM File Level Backup Support
(base support in OA52703)
- OA57173 Added initial support for FlashCopy to Global Mirror Primaries
"Do both LPARs need to be down (not desirable) before IPLing either of them
with the new CF and XCF?"
I would try to test the real situation as much as possible.
Besides, I think it will not work. LPAR's don't join each other, they join a
Sysplex. After ipling one system with the new
We are planning to test a remote copy sysplex environment and I would like to
test it in our home DEV environment
PROD data will not be accessible during the DR test so PROD sysplex should not
be affected
To test in DEV I have defined a new XCF and CFRM since I will need to do that
for DR
to
Andy
Be aware of thePDSE solution – if your shop is like mine – Shared DASD between
two LPARs andnot SYSPlex – PDSE will be your nightmare as it is mine currently
and it willbe even more when Enterprise COBOL V4.2goes out of support on
09/30/2021. Going SYSPlex in our setup is doable but
