Thank you very, very much!!!
Brian
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
The box isn't maxed out, but it's pretty close. It's a base z13s and no money
to upgrade it. The cards are a cheap way to get by (they are under $400 with
$0 increase in maintenance costs), whereas the cost of a CF is far greater. We
can't use the software CF option (build a CF lpar without a
No Jesse, I explained userid translation between HMC and SE. However
this translation has no relationship to object locking. Magic
"SooSysprog" is not magic and does not play any important role in
multiple access.
An access to SE or CPC is controlled by mechanism similar to GRS, simply
anothe
Yes, "ABEND S222" was shorthand.
> What exactly are you "looking at"?
I am looking at my report (or rather, an image of the output of my report
program, as displayed on a 3270 emulator). I posted my code that generates
the field in the report.
Yes, I know from experimentation (totally unrelated
To clarify I have been using TEST/TESTAUTH to debug my code since the tso
allocate command doesn’t resolve relative GDG
I’ll have to debug tool terminal manger to see what’s gong on
Thanks
> On May 31, 2020, at 12:58 AM, Brian Westerman
> wrote:
>
> I believe that since V2 of z/os that t
I am looking at some SMF 30 S222 ABEND completion codes. Most of them are
S222- as you would expect A handful have a non-zero reason code, many
of them A618.
What exactly are you "looking at"? Are you referring to something
formatted from fields SMF30SCC and SMF30ARC?
The ABEND 222 docume
A coupling facility using a share CP processor only needs a few
percent of the processor dedicated. If you are maxed out on CPU and
can't tolerate a slight slowdown at peak times, then one step up to
the next MSU setting should be enough.
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 7:05 AM Brian Westerman
wrote:
>
Take another look: I wrote foo(bar). Neither foo nor bar is goovoo; foo is the
base name and bar is the *relative* generation. If you specify "goovoo(-1),
(+1), (0), etc" in your JCL the job will fail on a JCL error. Again, gooovoo is
part of the name that Allocation constructs, *not* what you
Brian, you really don't need more FICON cards then 2 to support CTC connections
between lpars. It all comes down to how much redundancy you want. We support
connections between 11 lpars on one CEC with just 2 cards. We use one card as
what we call the primary connection and one card we call t
Shmuel,
Apologies for my autocorrect.
You say foo, I say goovoo, I did not say GgggV00.
I think we're splitting hairs to say the initiator is not an element of JES2,
but I'll agree that it is more correct to say the imitator does it.
Ron
Get Outlook for Android
On Sun,
I don't know if CA-ASM2 through some of its' exits could record the Time a
dataset was created. I do know that it was capable of recording the
creating job name using some of the
Reserved fields in the FMT1.DSCB.
k.kri...@comcast.net
--
It is in the IBM Publications Center -
https://www.ibm.com/e-business/linkweb/publications/servlet/pbi.wss
-Original Message-
>From: Brian Westerman
>Sent: May 30, 2020 11:26 PM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: SG24-5451
>
>Hi,
>
>Does anyone still have a copy of the redbook SG24-
Hi Brian,
When building a sysplex using CTC's, each LPAR mist have connectivity to all of
the other LPARS.
If you have more than two LPARS, it gets complicated very fast.
I've always had to get help from IBM for defining the CTC's in HCD.
Once you have to connectivity defined, the rest is fairl
Hi,
I'm looking for information on how to set up a base SYSPLEX with only Ficon
CTC's that seem to be referred to as XCF CTC's.
I'm sure someone had done this before and is probably doing it now for Multiple
LPARs that are running on the same processor CEC. Configuration help (parms
etc.) wou
14 matches
Mail list logo
