On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 23:29:21 +, Dymoke-Bradshaw, Lennie wrote:
>There is a DATA ENDDATA pair that can be used in TSO CLIST processing.
>
What does that have to do with Rexx?
The CLIST Ref. says:
commands | subcommands
The data to be ignored and passed to TSO/E for execution.
I don't need it often, but it's pretty handy when I want to hard-code a table
of data for the program to use. If the values are static enough, it makes
sense to store them in the program's comments instead of in a separate dataset.
---
Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
/*
There is a DATA ENDDATA pair that can be used in TSO CLIST processing.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Gibney, Dave
Sent: 14 August 2020 20:56
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Rexx detail, or things I dont do often enough
I
Opps. Forgot the sigl...
בתאריך שבת, 15 באוג׳ 2020, 0:31, מאת Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>:
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 23:45:19 +0300, ITschak Mugzach wrote:
>
> >I once wrote an installer that behaved like a zip exec. I think it was
> >discussed here as well. The
On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 23:45:19 +0300, ITschak Mugzach wrote:
>I once wrote an installer that behaved like a zip exec. I think it was
>discussed here as well. The idea is like the sample code below that
>demonstrates reading panel from the program body for later saving it in a
>temporary file.
Please send updates for the ispf tips/tricks.
I've used the sourceline extensively - check out the LOADISPF exec on my site -
copy it into your exec and then you can insert inline using control records
ispf panels, msgs, skels, and clists and execs. All are copied to temp
allocated libraries
I once wrote an installer that behaved like a zip exec. I think it was
discussed here as well. The idea is like the sample code below that
demonstrates reading panel from the program body for later saving it in a
temporary file. Remember That as this is not a comment the data that you
can store
Thank you. That looks like it would do the trick. I think I'll just use PUSH.
I think I was remembering SAS, or maybe academic versions of PASCAL or FORTRAN
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Seymour J Metz
> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2020 1:09 PM
">>-SOURCELINE(--+---+--)---><
'-n-'
returns the line number of the final line in the program if you omit n or 0 if
the implementation does not allow access to the source lines. If you specify n,
returns the nth line in the program if
I think this is what I was looking for. Couldn't find the source line access in
the fine manual.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Seymour J Metz
> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2020 1:02 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Rexx detail, or
You can cheat. Put the data inside a comment and access the source lines.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Gibney, Dave
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2020 3:56 PM
To:
I have this vague memory of being able to have data embedded inside a Rexx
Exec. Some manner of data start and end delimiting lines and accessed via
looping with PULL or PARSE.
I know I can just PUSH or QUEUE data onto the stack, but that's not what I
vaguely remember. Am I all wet, or just
I doubt it would be in production if it wasn't ready :)
On 2020-08-14 4:32 PM, Brian Westerman wrote:
I hate to say this but I can't help myself, but what makes you think they
actually got it to work? :)
But seriously, the redbooks are written sometimes before the final processes are set in
I hate to say this but I can't help myself, but what makes you think they
actually got it to work? :)
But seriously, the redbooks are written sometimes before the final processes
are set in place, so sometimes they tell you what "should be" instead of what
"is be".
From what you are saying,
W dniu 14.08.2020 o 00:48, Jesse 1 Robinson pisze:
At one shop, before we moved to cartridge, we had 3420s that were so 'obsolete'
that spare parts became prohibitively expensive. On more than one occasion, our
loyal CE team carved replacement parts out of wood (!) to extend the lifespan
of
Why? It fits in 12 bits, so LA will work.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Charles Mills
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2020 11:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RACF
16 matches
Mail list logo
