Re: TWS replacements

2021-01-24 Thread Radoslaw Skorupka

To complement: there are several products from several companies.
BMC ControlM
CA ESP (now Broadcom)
CA-7
IBM IWS aka TWS aka OPC
ASG-ZEKE
former BETA 42
Tidal Workload Automation
schedule-in
OPS/Jobmaster
ActiveBatch
JAMS Scheduler
Stonebranch
...

Note: some of the above products have only z/OS agent, while control and 
management are on other platform (usually Windows). At least some of 
them lack many important features.


Prices may vary.

--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: (External):Re: TWS replacements

2021-01-24 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
We converted from another product to TWS some years ago. It was a massive and 
lengthy effort just to arrive at a point similar to where we left. I don't know 
how much we saved on the s/w, but it provided an awful lot of employment. 

.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
robin...@sce.com

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2021 2:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: TWS replacements

*** EXTERNAL EMAIL - Use caution when opening links or attachments ***

IMHO it would be hard to get something cheaper and not worse. Of course prices 
depend on contracts and your need may be satisfied with very basic tool.

--
Radoslaw Skorupka
(from new mail)


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: How to validate mount points for IPLs

2021-01-24 Thread R.S.
Well, In my opinion there is no such tool or process. 
Few remarks:
1. Assuming you have such checker and just tested BPXPRM member. Few minutes 
later things may change - someone can delete or rename some ZFS. Or just modify 
BPXPRM.
2. "Prior IPL" is a little bit ambigous. Does it mean the system is down? Or it 
is up and you want to re-IPL it? For non-IPLed system you would have to access 
datasets from other (tech) system. It is possible, but a little bit hard for 
VSAM ZFS. Of course "before re-IPL" scenario is much simpler. 
3. It is not matter of ZFS dataset names and typos. Or missing datasets. What 
about mount point? Mount point, a path ma be nonexistent - this can be checked 
before re-IPL. However mount point can be simply wrong. 

My advices:
1. Simply protect BPXPRM against hasty changes. It's obvious, just track all 
the updates. Comments are your friend. 
2. The above simplify and reduce effort needed to check it manually. Just check 
latest changes, especially changes made after last IPL.
3. Keep it simple. Documentation would help.
4. One can create the following REXX script: read every filesystem name and 
list it i.e. using listdsi. Also read every mount point and check its existence 
in z/OS Unix.


HTH

--
Radoslaw Skorupka
(currently unemployed)
Lodz, Poland

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: TWS replacements

2021-01-24 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 ...in all fairness, TWS (initially OPC, now IWS), provides all the support and 
solutioning as mentioned by Mark in his email.  One of the major benefits of 
IWS (and this is just one of many) is that being an IBM product, it has the 
most prolific set of interfaces to the zOS environment including IBM 
tools/utilities and virtually all other environmentss that have some 
interaction with the batch environment.  This also applies to 3rd party vendor 
tools that have some impact on JCL and/or scheduling.  Lastly, IBM has an 
active process that can automatically (using tools) convert non-IWS schedulers 
to IWS.
I have been in the JCL and scheduler environment since 1982 and have supported 
(in either technical pre-sales, actual use of, or conversion projects specific 
to scheduling software) and believe that IWS is the product leader in automated 
scheduling.
Disclaimer, I used to work at ASG and am currently with IBM.
Regards,
Mitch
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Mark Jacobs <0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Sat, Jan 23, 2021 10:32 am
Subject: Re: TWS replacements

ASG-Zeke is an automated job scheduler that dynamically schedules and 
dispatches events, and monitors every aspect of your job schedule.

ASG-Zeke provides wide ranging functionality, including system command 
scheduling, automatic variable calculation and substitution, step-level 
condition code validation, workload balancing, schedule forecasting and 
simulation, SAF security, optional SMP/E support, simultaneous support for 
multiple JCL libraries, electronic vaulting capabilities, pre-built calendars, 
and other utilities. When you add ASG’s cross-platform agent(s), scheduling is 
extended to all the major platforms, including Windows, Linux, UNIX, OS/400.

Disclaimer. I work for ASG Technologies.

Mark Jacobs

Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.

GPG Public Key - 
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&search=markjac...@protonmail.com

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Saturday, January 23rd, 2021 at 11:14 AM, IBM user  wrote:

> What are some of the less-expensive IBM Tivoli Workload Scheduler TWS (IWS) 
> replacements that are available?
>
> Solution needs to manage mainframe and remote Windows/Linux workloads.
>
> IBM User
>
> ---
>
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMP/E and Isolating a CSECT within a load module

2021-01-24 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 04:15:28 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:

>What is the point of specifying an entry point on the END statement of, e.g., 
>a Bessel function subroutine?
> 
Imagine an implementation where that Bessel function might
be invoked by LINK.

>
>From: CM Poncelet
>Sent: Friday, January 22, 2021 7:11 PM
>
>...: otherwise
>it's the assembler's "END " that is selected by the LKED. If the
>assembler source END statement does not specify a label, ...
>
 It need not be a label. Some forms of expression suffice:

https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.asma400/end.htm


-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: How to validate mount points for IPLs

2021-01-24 Thread Jousma, David
Hi lizette,

For all the zos mounts, I use my service mount batch job as the template for 
those in parmlib with modifications to syntaxes to fit.  Everything else for 
/tmp, ,etc, dev, and any other ancillary vendor, user file systems are 
ieheyeball.   There aren't many that would fail an ipl entirely so can be fixed 
after you are up.  There is the health check that was mentioned,  but that only 
calls out differences between what is in parmlib and what is actually mounted.

Hope this helps!

From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of 
Lizette Koehler 
Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2021 1:14:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU 
Subject: How to validate mount points for IPLs

**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**

**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected 
emails**

List



I am not quite sure what technique or process I can put together to validate
the Mount points in BPXPRMxx prior to an IPL



SYNTAXCHECK only makes sure that I did not finger check



It does not say this will mount or not mount



And with z/OS and other products using lots of mount points - hand checking
is getting difficult.



Any ideas are welcomed.



Thank you



Lizette




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**

**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected 
emails**



${If.App.WXP}Classification: Internal Use${If.End}
This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be 
privileged.
It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this 
e-mail in error,
please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner.  If you are not the 
intended 
recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information
is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender 
that the 
message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer 
system. Your 
assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


(personal) status update

2021-01-24 Thread Radoslaw Skorupka

To whom it may concern

I just changed my subscription details - new email.
Reason: My previous email is no longer available, because I no longer 
work anymore for my previous employer.
Big change after 22 years and I have no experience in changing listserv 
account parameters. I hope I did it well. Now I don't have new company 
email, because I'm just looking for new job, but I think I will stay 
with this private account on the list.
I'm sorry for off-topic noise, however I just to confirm it is still me, 
not hacked account or so. For those who sent me off-list: you will not 
get any answer from my previous account.


Regards
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
 Lodz, Poland

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN