Re: Compuware comic book

2021-02-11 Thread ITschak Mugzach
zMan,

The "mainfame" is just to remind us that some people think that "sic
transit gloria mundi" of the mainframe...

ITschak

ITschak Mugzach
*|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Continuous Monitoring
for z/OS, x/Linux & IBM I **| z/VM coming soon  *




On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 11:14 PM zMan  wrote:

> https://devops.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Triumph-Of-The-Mainframe.pdf
>
> While I admire the effort, I feel compelled to point out:
>
>- The typo “mainfame” on p.5
>- The fact that the mainframe has NOTHING to do with solving the problem
>in the story
>- RBAC is not the opposite of “plain text” (!) authentication
>
> IOW, the story is garbage. I also hate the artwork, but that might just be
> me. Jack Kirby he ain’t.
>
> As a friend put it, "Batch, please."
> --
> zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Compuware comic book

2021-02-11 Thread zMan
Good point. I was just hoping that something from a company focused on the
mainframe would do better.

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 5:25 PM Seymour J Metz  wrote:

> Hey, it's a classic example of Buzz Word Bingo. It's not supposed to make
> sense.
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
> 
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf
> of zMan [zedgarhoo...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 4:13 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Compuware comic book
>
>
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/14kiVP7JHIB8LCYyMfcaEGLpGSsc5jx9_Xw9qLgtKF-k7w5hEOhn6xdq82o8LJd_rTTc2IL3yGzmQcD15kxYvJwPoEnKEBahh9NnlmCoGbr3T4f8mBN6QXVY5fpUyZW0t8oGonR2WxyF3UF6HEHXvYtDVrBL--vQy_ERNMALLUh58xtHkQ7FqZTCzFKJDM2b0FQ9nGQiFdDvP4pIo4K31-0vSMaPKZUoeFYALhYLjij8Ji9CXgZZOxxxO4dWmvrNbgxKV9nlLVwYY35Ufxf3vg_hne8tqo1YlovB33r1ov-3qXztAshAp1-B9v7m9jcR_Scv1oQM827v9u2VfmBmUTS7Ku4JlPUX6z7WSd_C6jbqBZGwW5gYOZKmWrTk5n9Le-eaikHDN_0c3tWvKtP7b5eHpDW7GKTVKUFlL0tJwu6iE2-OPQG4-yzWEzaKqU29X/https%3A%2F%2Fdevops.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2021%2F02%2FTriumph-Of-The-Mainframe.pdf
>
> While I admire the effort, I feel compelled to point out:
>
>- The typo “mainfame” on p.5
>- The fact that the mainframe has NOTHING to do with solving the problem
>in the story
>- RBAC is not the opposite of “plain text” (!) authentication
>
> IOW, the story is garbage. I also hate the artwork, but that might just be
> me. Jack Kirby he ain’t.
>
> As a friend put it, "Batch, please."
> --
> zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>


-- 
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Compuware comic book

2021-02-11 Thread Seymour J Metz
Hey, it's a classic example of Buzz Word Bingo. It's not supposed to make sense.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
zMan [zedgarhoo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 4:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Compuware comic book

https://secure-web.cisco.com/14kiVP7JHIB8LCYyMfcaEGLpGSsc5jx9_Xw9qLgtKF-k7w5hEOhn6xdq82o8LJd_rTTc2IL3yGzmQcD15kxYvJwPoEnKEBahh9NnlmCoGbr3T4f8mBN6QXVY5fpUyZW0t8oGonR2WxyF3UF6HEHXvYtDVrBL--vQy_ERNMALLUh58xtHkQ7FqZTCzFKJDM2b0FQ9nGQiFdDvP4pIo4K31-0vSMaPKZUoeFYALhYLjij8Ji9CXgZZOxxxO4dWmvrNbgxKV9nlLVwYY35Ufxf3vg_hne8tqo1YlovB33r1ov-3qXztAshAp1-B9v7m9jcR_Scv1oQM827v9u2VfmBmUTS7Ku4JlPUX6z7WSd_C6jbqBZGwW5gYOZKmWrTk5n9Le-eaikHDN_0c3tWvKtP7b5eHpDW7GKTVKUFlL0tJwu6iE2-OPQG4-yzWEzaKqU29X/https%3A%2F%2Fdevops.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2021%2F02%2FTriumph-Of-The-Mainframe.pdf

While I admire the effort, I feel compelled to point out:

   - The typo “mainfame” on p.5
   - The fact that the mainframe has NOTHING to do with solving the problem
   in the story
   - RBAC is not the opposite of “plain text” (!) authentication

IOW, the story is garbage. I also hate the artwork, but that might just be
me. Jack Kirby he ain’t.

As a friend put it, "Batch, please."
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Compuware comic book

2021-02-11 Thread zMan
Nope, paid gig. But good suggestion!

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 4:31 PM Tom Brennan 
wrote:

> My bet is the artist is a student who did it for free, so I give them a
> break.  And if he/she is anything like my kids (both do that kind of
> work), one of the characters in the comic looks like the artist :)
>
> On 2/11/2021 1:13 PM, zMan wrote:
> >
> https://devops.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Triumph-Of-The-Mainframe.pdf
> >
> > While I admire the effort, I feel compelled to point out:
> >
> > - The typo “mainfame” on p.5
> > - The fact that the mainframe has NOTHING to do with solving the
> problem
> > in the story
> > - RBAC is not the opposite of “plain text” (!) authentication
> >
> > IOW, the story is garbage. I also hate the artwork, but that might just
> be
> > me. Jack Kirby he ain’t.
> >
> > As a friend put it, "Batch, please."
> >
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>


-- 
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Compuware comic book

2021-02-11 Thread Tom Brennan
My bet is the artist is a student who did it for free, so I give them a 
break.  And if he/she is anything like my kids (both do that kind of 
work), one of the characters in the comic looks like the artist :)


On 2/11/2021 1:13 PM, zMan wrote:

https://devops.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Triumph-Of-The-Mainframe.pdf

While I admire the effort, I feel compelled to point out:

- The typo “mainfame” on p.5
- The fact that the mainframe has NOTHING to do with solving the problem
in the story
- RBAC is not the opposite of “plain text” (!) authentication

IOW, the story is garbage. I also hate the artwork, but that might just be
me. Jack Kirby he ain’t.

As a friend put it, "Batch, please."



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Compuware comic book

2021-02-11 Thread zMan
https://devops.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Triumph-Of-The-Mainframe.pdf

While I admire the effort, I feel compelled to point out:

   - The typo “mainfame” on p.5
   - The fact that the mainframe has NOTHING to do with solving the problem
   in the story
   - RBAC is not the opposite of “plain text” (!) authentication

IOW, the story is garbage. I also hate the artwork, but that might just be
me. Jack Kirby he ain’t.

As a friend put it, "Batch, please."
-- 
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: EXTERNAL EMAIL: Re: DB2 member to start on different LPAR

2021-02-11 Thread Chris Hoelscher
A few thoughts

This is NOT purely an academic excersize - if an lpar crashed with a DS member 
on it, and the LPAR COULD NOT be immediately restarted. You would NEED to bring 
up the downed member on the remaining LPAR in light mode - to free any locked 
threads - miake sure all the drda ports are defined an ALL potential LPARS 

Chris Hoelscher
Lead Sys DBA 
IBM Global Technical Services on assignmemt to Humana Inc.
T 502.476.2538  or 502.407.7266

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Jerry Whitteridge
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 2:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] EXTERNAL EMAIL: Re: DB2 member to start on different 
LPAR

[External Email: Use caution with links and attachments]


The answer is much more related to your infrastructure than the DB2 DS Member 
itself. (You can indeed run different DS members on a single LPAR) - we've done 
it during a DR exercise ) The question is more about do you have shared 
parmlibs/proclibs/RACF etc. etc. Some other considerations might be the 
listening ports for DDF (do the DS Members share a port or have unique ports ?) 
or ZFS file systems ?

Jerry Whitteridge
jerry.whitteri...@albertsons.com
Manager Mainframe Systems & HP Non-Stop
Albertsons Companies

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 11:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: EXTERNAL EMAIL: Re: DB2 member to start on different LPAR

Unless I am missing something.

The point of DB2 Data Sharing is there is a GROUP (Umbrella) that connects 
multiple DB2 Regions.

So if you have 2 or more DB2 Data Sharing regions.  One on LPAR1 one on LPAR2

Then if LPAR1 is down, then LPAR2 will take on the DB2 data sharing work.

Does that make Sense?

Lizette


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 8:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DB2 member to start on different LPAR

we are being constrained due to operations limitations. We are planning to 
upgrade our development environment and we need to have the development CICS 
regions down. Unfortunately operations says they have difficulty going thru all 
the regions and just stopping development cics. Our CICS regions are connected 
to only 1 LPAR. So only in order to ease their work they want to just bring 
down that LPAR with a scheduled IPL. Our primary DB2 member runs on that LPAR. 
So I wanted to start it on a "non-CICS" LPAR.
Bill

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN 

 Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the corporate 
e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the 
recipient. This e-mail may contain proprietary information and is intended only 
for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not 
the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message 
in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, 
please notify the sender immediately.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material.  If you receive this 
material/information in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.

Humana Inc. and its subsidiaries comply with applicable Federal civil rights 
laws and
do not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, ancestry, 
age, disability, sex,
marital status, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or religion. 
Humana Inc. and its subsidiaries do not
exclude people or treat them differently because of race, color, national 
origin, ancestry, age,
disability, sex, marital status, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, 
or religion.

English: ATTENTION: If you do not speak English, language assistance services, 
free
of charge, are available to you. Call 1‐877‐320‐1235 (TTY: 711).

Español (Spanish): ATENCIÓN: Si habla español, tiene a su disposición servicios
gratuitos de asistencia lingüística. Llame al 1‐877‐320‐1235 (TTY: 711).

繁體中文(Chinese):注意:如果您使用繁體中文,您可以免費獲得語言援助
服務。請致電 1‐877‐320‐1235 (TTY: 711)。


Re: EXTERNAL EMAIL: Re: DB2 member to start on different LPAR

2021-02-11 Thread Jerry Whitteridge
The answer is much more related to your infrastructure than the DB2 DS Member 
itself. (You can indeed run different DS members on a single LPAR) - we've done 
it during a DR exercise ) The question is more about do you have shared 
parmlibs/proclibs/RACF etc. etc. Some other considerations might be the 
listening ports for DDF (do the DS Members share a port or have unique ports ?) 
or ZFS file systems ?

Jerry Whitteridge
jerry.whitteri...@albertsons.com
Manager Mainframe Systems & HP Non-Stop
Albertsons Companies

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 11:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: EXTERNAL EMAIL: Re: DB2 member to start on different LPAR

Unless I am missing something.

The point of DB2 Data Sharing is there is a GROUP (Umbrella) that connects 
multiple DB2 Regions.

So if you have 2 or more DB2 Data Sharing regions.  One on LPAR1 one on LPAR2

Then if LPAR1 is down, then LPAR2 will take on the DB2 data sharing work.

Does that make Sense?

Lizette


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 8:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DB2 member to start on different LPAR

we are being constrained due to operations limitations. We are planning to 
upgrade our development environment and we need to have the development CICS 
regions down. Unfortunately operations says they have difficulty going thru all 
the regions and just stopping development cics. Our CICS regions are connected 
to only 1 LPAR. So only in order to ease their work they want to just bring 
down that LPAR with a scheduled IPL. Our primary DB2 member runs on that LPAR. 
So I wanted to start it on a "non-CICS" LPAR.
Bill

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the corporate 
e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the 
recipient. This e-mail may contain proprietary information and is intended only 
for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not 
the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message 
in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, 
please notify the sender immediately.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: DB2 member to start on different LPAR

2021-02-11 Thread Lizette Koehler
Are you saying you currently do not have a DB2 Data Sharing Region on LPAR2 
(Non CICS?) for this DB2 Region?

Lizette


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 11:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DB2 member to start on different LPAR

Unless I am missing something.

The point of DB2 Data Sharing is there is a GROUP (Umbrella) that connects 
multiple DB2 Regions.

So if you have 2 or more DB2 Data Sharing regions.  One on LPAR1 one on LPAR2

Then if LPAR1 is down, then LPAR2 will take on the DB2 data sharing work.

Does that make Sense?

Lizette


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 8:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DB2 member to start on different LPAR

we are being constrained due to operations limitations. We are planning to 
upgrade our development environment and we need to have the development CICS 
regions down. Unfortunately operations says they have difficulty going thru all 
the regions and just stopping development cics. Our CICS regions are connected 
to only 1 LPAR. So only in order to ease their work they want to just bring 
down that LPAR with a scheduled IPL. Our primary DB2 member runs on that LPAR. 
So I wanted to start it on a "non-CICS" LPAR. 
Bill 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: DB2 member to start on different LPAR

2021-02-11 Thread Lizette Koehler
Unless I am missing something.

The point of DB2 Data Sharing is there is a GROUP (Umbrella) that connects 
multiple DB2 Regions.

So if you have 2 or more DB2 Data Sharing regions.  One on LPAR1 one on LPAR2

Then if LPAR1 is down, then LPAR2 will take on the DB2 data sharing work.

Does that make Sense?

Lizette


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 8:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DB2 member to start on different LPAR

we are being constrained due to operations limitations. We are planning to 
upgrade our development environment and we need to have the development CICS 
regions down. Unfortunately operations says they have difficulty going thru all 
the regions and just stopping development cics. Our CICS regions are connected 
to only 1 LPAR. So only in order to ease their work they want to just bring 
down that LPAR with a scheduled IPL. Our primary DB2 member runs on that LPAR. 
So I wanted to start it on a "non-CICS" LPAR. 
Bill 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Collecting SMF data with Logstreams

2021-02-11 Thread Bonnie Ordonez
Decisions around how long to keep SMF data in the log streams are unique per 
customer installation. IBM does not make recommendations for that. For your 
IFASMFDL return code concerns, implementing a post processing job log 'scraper' 
world be useful to take specific actions based on the messages in the job log 
that are returned by IFASMFDL.

Bonnie Ordonez, IBM, SMF Level 3

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Datasets with - in HLQ

2021-02-11 Thread Charles Mills
I have used it extensively.

I know my MODIFY command parser would handle blanks as equivalent to commas
-- but I can assure you I never tested that. (The identical parser is used
elsewhere, where blanks are common as separators.)

Charles


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Seymour J Metz
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 8:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Datasets with - in HLQ

The MODIFY command processor creates a CIB and queues it off of the relevant
CSCB. See the QEDIT macro.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Datasets with - in HLQ

2021-02-11 Thread Seymour J Metz
The MODIFY command processor creates a CIB and queues it off of the relevant 
CSCB. See the QEDIT macro.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Pew, Curtis G [curtis@austin.utexas.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2021 4:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Datasets with - in HLQ

On Feb 10, 2021, at 3:27 PM, Charles Mills  wrote:
>
> I guess blanks are legal in a MODIFY command operand. I see an example in the 
> manual: F AXR,SYSREXX STATUS
>
> I did not know that.
>

I believe that the console address space handles modify commands by sticking 
everything after the comma into a buffer and passing that to the referenced 
job. Then it’s up to the receiving code to decide how to parse it.


--
Pew, Curtis G
curtis@austin.utexas.edu






--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: DB2 member to start on different LPAR

2021-02-11 Thread Bill Giannelli
we are being constrained due to operations limitations. We are planning to 
upgrade our development environment and we need to have the development CICS 
regions down. Unfortunately operations says they have difficulty going thru all 
the regions and just stopping development cics. Our CICS regions are connected 
to only 1 LPAR. So only in order to ease their work they want to just bring 
down that LPAR with a scheduled IPL. Our primary DB2 member runs on that LPAR. 
So I wanted to start it on a "non-CICS" LPAR. 
Bill

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: DB2 member to start on different LPAR

2021-02-11 Thread Lizette Koehler
Bill,

Why are you wanting to do that?

A DB2 Data sharing environment has a DB2 Start on each lpar that shares the 
Same DB2 information.   If you have 4 LPARs, you would have one DB2 Data 
Sharing region on the LPARs you want.

For example:

I have a group name of DBP2, but I have 3 DB2 regions (DBP1, DBP2, DBP3) 
running on LPARs on LPAR1, LPAR2, LPAR3

I so long as the user is coming into one of those DB2 systems, it has access to 
the DBP2 group functions.

So user A can be running on LPAR1 in DBP1
User B can be running on LPAR3 on DPB3
Batch DB2 job could be running on LPAR2 on DPB3

All of these activities would be for the GROUP DBP2.

I am not sure why you want to change the DB2 members for the various LPARs.  If 
DB2 Data Sharing is set up, you should only need to shut down or start up the 
appropriate DB2 region.

Can you provide more details on what problem you are trying to solve?

Lizette



-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 3:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: DB2 member to start on different LPAR

We have DB2 data sharing and I have a need to start DB2 members on any LPAR.
Aside from RACF definitions, is the only other item I need in place is the SSID 
symbol in SYS1.PARMLIB(IEFSSNxx) ?
thanks
Bill

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Datasets with - in HLQ

2021-02-11 Thread Charles Mills
@Peter, the example I quoted came from 
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.4.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r4.ieag100/m3modaxr.htm
 . (Hope that survives the wrap.) 

I was *actually* working from the V2R1 docs (because I am a stick in the mud 
and prefer BookManager to the unreliable Knowledge Center). I see IBM has now 
improved the wording. While V2R1 only shows the syntax I quoted, the V2R4 that 
I cite above permits and shows both SR,STATUS and SR STATUS. (The V2R1 doc was 
adequate to my point: it is sufficient to show that my perception of "no blanks 
allowed" was incorrect.)

Thanks for asking.

Charles


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Peter Relson
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 6:25 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Datasets with - in HLQ

Curtis P wrote

On Feb 10, 2021, at 3:27 PM, Charles Mills  wrote:
> 
> I guess blanks are legal in a MODIFY command operand. I see an example 
in the manual: F AXR,SYSREXX STATUS
> 
> I did not know that. 
> 

I believe that the console address space handles modify commands by 
sticking everything after the comma into a buffer and passing that to the 
referenced job. Then it’s up to the receiving code to decide how to parse 
it.


Curtis is correct. Many command processors treat everything after the 
first blank as commentary (IEASYSxx parsing, while not a "command", has 
that protocol).
Many of the more recent command processors treat blank the same as comma.

HOWEVER, the doc in the book is atypical and will be changed. The intent 
is that the doc for commands shows the syntax style typical for commands 
(e.g., comma separators, KEYWORD=value notation) while the doc for parmlib 
members shows the syntax style typical for parmlib members (blank 
separators, KEYWORD(value) notation), even if they might happen to support 
both styles (as the SETPROG command and the PROGxx parmlib member do).

Charles, I found that here "z/OS 2.4.0 ->  IBM z/OS Management Facility -> 
IZUP916E". Did you perhaps find another occurrence that we can also 
correct?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMF fields of RMF Subchannel Activity Report

2021-02-11 Thread Ituriel do Neto
 Martin,
We develop a product that intercepts SMF records in real-time and generates a 
DataBase in Open Platform. This Data can be used to generate reports and 
graphics dynamically.
Best Regards
Em quinta-feira, 11 de fevereiro de 2021 11:19:39 BRT, Martin Packer 
 escreveu:  
 
 Subchannel busy (as opposed to busy CONDITIONS) is estimated from request 
rate and service time multiplied together.

I think we'd all like to know the purpose of this, though.

Cheers, Martin

Martin Packer

Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM

+44-7802-245-584

email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com

Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker

Blog: https://mainframeperformancetopics.com

Mainframe, Performance, Topics Podcast Series (With Marna Walle): 
https://anchor.fm/marna-walle

Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCu_65HaYgksbF6Q8SQ4oOvA



From:  Ituriel do Neto <03427ec2837d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To:    IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:  11/02/2021 13:25
Subject:        [EXTERNAL] Re: SMF fields of RMF Subchannel Activity 
Report
Sent by:        IBM Mainframe Discussion List 



 Colin,
Thank you very much for your time.I'll take a closer look at these SMF 
fields.

Best Regards
Ituriel
    Em quinta-feira, 11 de fevereiro de 2021 09:55:10 BRT, Colin Paice 
 escreveu: 
 
 Hi,

CF level  Local Coupling Facility Data Section
24 18 R744FPBC 8 l_float Number of times coupling facility requests fail
due to path busy.

You get data for each structure

For the Structures you get the different sorts of requests
92 5C R744SSRC 8 l_float Count of number of times for synchronous requests
 44 R744SARC 8 l_float The total number of operations executed
asynchronously at the
coupling facility.
R744SATM 8 binary Summed service time for asynchronous requests in
microseconds
 54 R744SASQ 8 binary Summed squares of service time for asynchronous
requests.

so you can calculate your own average and standard deviation from these.

and add up the total number of sync/asnyc requests  to get a figure for 
the
CF as a whole

regards

Colin
.



On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 12:31, Ituriel do Neto <
03427ec2837d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

>  Hi Colin,
> I do need the SMF fields, not the extraction from RMF. I have to create 
a
> database with information related to Path Busy, Service Time, Number of
> subchannels, sync and async requests, etc...
> And i could see similar information in several sections of SMF 74.4, 
which
> causes me confusion.
>
> Regards
> Ituriel
>
>
>    Em quinta-feira, 11 de fevereiro de 2021 09:17:18 BRT, Colin Paice <
> colinpai...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>  You can get RMF to format most(all?) of these records.
> What high level analysis do you want to do?
> Colin
>
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 11:56, Ituriel do Neto <
> 03427ec2837d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > I'm trying to collect some information from SMF 74.4 and would like 
some
> > advice.I need to analyze data similar to Subchannel Activity Report 
does,
> > but i'm a little confused.
> > In SMF 74.4 there are several sections and, if possible, i would like 
to
> > know which one isused as the basis for RMF Subchannel Activity Report.
> > Thanks in Advance
> >
> > Best Regards
> > Ituriel do Nascimento NetoSystem Programmer
> >
> > --
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
  

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Datasets with - in HLQ

2021-02-11 Thread Peter Relson
Curtis P wrote

On Feb 10, 2021, at 3:27 PM, Charles Mills  wrote:
> 
> I guess blanks are legal in a MODIFY command operand. I see an example 
in the manual: F AXR,SYSREXX STATUS
> 
> I did not know that. 
> 

I believe that the console address space handles modify commands by 
sticking everything after the comma into a buffer and passing that to the 
referenced job. Then it’s up to the receiving code to decide how to parse 
it.


Curtis is correct. Many command processors treat everything after the 
first blank as commentary (IEASYSxx parsing, while not a "command", has 
that protocol).
Many of the more recent command processors treat blank the same as comma.

HOWEVER, the doc in the book is atypical and will be changed. The intent 
is that the doc for commands shows the syntax style typical for commands 
(e.g., comma separators, KEYWORD=value notation) while the doc for parmlib 
members shows the syntax style typical for parmlib members (blank 
separators, KEYWORD(value) notation), even if they might happen to support 
both styles (as the SETPROG command and the PROGxx parmlib member do).

Charles, I found that here "z/OS 2.4.0 ->  IBM z/OS Management Facility -> 
IZUP916E". Did you perhaps find another occurrence that we can also 
correct?

Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMF fields of RMF Subchannel Activity Report

2021-02-11 Thread Martin Packer
Subchannel busy (as opposed to busy CONDITIONS) is estimated from request 
rate and service time multiplied together.

I think we'd all like to know the purpose of this, though.

Cheers, Martin

Martin Packer

Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM

+44-7802-245-584

email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com

Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker

Blog: https://mainframeperformancetopics.com

Mainframe, Performance, Topics Podcast Series (With Marna Walle): 
https://anchor.fm/marna-walle

Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCu_65HaYgksbF6Q8SQ4oOvA



From:   Ituriel do Neto <03427ec2837d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   11/02/2021 13:25
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: SMF fields of RMF Subchannel Activity 
Report
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 



 Colin,
Thank you very much for your time.I'll take a closer look at these SMF 
fields.

Best Regards
Ituriel
Em quinta-feira, 11 de fevereiro de 2021 09:55:10 BRT, Colin Paice 
 escreveu: 
 
 Hi,

CF level  Local Coupling Facility Data Section
24 18 R744FPBC 8 l_float Number of times coupling facility requests fail
due to path busy.

You get data for each structure

For the Structures you get the different sorts of requests
92 5C R744SSRC 8 l_float Count of number of times for synchronous requests
 44 R744SARC 8 l_float The total number of operations executed
asynchronously at the
coupling facility.
R744SATM 8 binary Summed service time for asynchronous requests in
microseconds
 54 R744SASQ 8 binary Summed squares of service time for asynchronous
requests.

so you can calculate your own average and standard deviation from these.

and add up the total number of sync/asnyc requests  to get a figure for 
the
CF as a whole

regards

Colin
.



On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 12:31, Ituriel do Neto <
03427ec2837d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

>  Hi Colin,
> I do need the SMF fields, not the extraction from RMF. I have to create 
a
> database with information related to Path Busy, Service Time, Number of
> subchannels, sync and async requests, etc...
> And i could see similar information in several sections of SMF 74.4, 
which
> causes me confusion.
>
> Regards
> Ituriel
>
>
>Em quinta-feira, 11 de fevereiro de 2021 09:17:18 BRT, Colin Paice <
> colinpai...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>  You can get RMF to format most(all?) of these records.
> What high level analysis do you want to do?
> Colin
>
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 11:56, Ituriel do Neto <
> 03427ec2837d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > I'm trying to collect some information from SMF 74.4 and would like 
some
> > advice.I need to analyze data similar to Subchannel Activity Report 
does,
> > but i'm a little confused.
> > In SMF 74.4 there are several sections and, if possible, i would like 
to
> > know which one isused as the basis for RMF Subchannel Activity Report.
> > Thanks in Advance
> >
> > Best Regards
> > Ituriel do Nascimento NetoSystem Programmer
> >
> > --
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: DB2 member to start on different LPAR

2021-02-11 Thread Bill Giannelli
no I simply want to start DB2 Member1 on LPAR2.
Bill

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMF fields of RMF Subchannel Activity Report

2021-02-11 Thread Ituriel do Neto
 Colin,
Thank you very much for your time.I'll take a closer look at these SMF fields.

Best Regards
Ituriel
Em quinta-feira, 11 de fevereiro de 2021 09:55:10 BRT, Colin Paice 
 escreveu:  
 
 Hi,

CF level  Local Coupling Facility Data Section
24 18 R744FPBC 8 l_float Number of times coupling facility requests fail
due to path busy.

You get data for each structure

For the Structures you get the different sorts of requests
92 5C R744SSRC 8 l_float Count of number of times for synchronous requests
 44 R744SARC 8 l_float The total number of operations executed
asynchronously at the
coupling facility.
R744SATM 8 binary Summed service time for asynchronous requests in
microseconds
 54 R744SASQ 8 binary Summed squares of service time for asynchronous
requests.

so you can calculate your own average and standard deviation from these.

and add up the total number of sync/asnyc requests  to get a figure for the
CF as a whole

regards

Colin
.



On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 12:31, Ituriel do Neto <
03427ec2837d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

>  Hi Colin,
> I do need the SMF fields, not the extraction from RMF. I have to create a
> database with information related to Path Busy, Service Time, Number of
> subchannels, sync and async requests, etc...
> And i could see similar information in several sections of SMF 74.4, which
> causes me confusion.
>
> Regards
> Ituriel
>
>
>    Em quinta-feira, 11 de fevereiro de 2021 09:17:18 BRT, Colin Paice <
> colinpai...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>  You can get RMF to format most(all?) of these records.
> What high level analysis do you want to do?
> Colin
>
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 11:56, Ituriel do Neto <
> 03427ec2837d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > I'm trying to collect some information from SMF 74.4 and would like some
> > advice.I need to analyze data similar to Subchannel Activity Report does,
> > but i'm a little confused.
> > In SMF 74.4 there are several sections and, if possible, i would like to
> > know which one isused as the basis for RMF Subchannel Activity Report.
> > Thanks in Advance
> >
> > Best Regards
> > Ituriel do Nascimento NetoSystem Programmer
> >
> > --
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
  

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMF fields of RMF Subchannel Activity Report

2021-02-11 Thread Colin Paice
Hi,

CF level  Local Coupling Facility Data Section
24 18 R744FPBC 8 l_float Number of times coupling facility requests fail
due to path busy.

You get data for each structure

For the Structures you get the different sorts of requests
92 5C R744SSRC 8 l_float Count of number of times for synchronous requests
 44 R744SARC 8 l_float The total number of operations executed
asynchronously at the
coupling facility.
R744SATM 8 binary Summed service time for asynchronous requests in
microseconds
 54 R744SASQ 8 binary Summed squares of service time for asynchronous
requests.

so you can calculate your own average and standard deviation from these.

and add up the total number of sync/asnyc requests  to get a figure for the
CF as a whole

regards

Colin
.



On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 12:31, Ituriel do Neto <
03427ec2837d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

>  Hi Colin,
> I do need the SMF fields, not the extraction from RMF. I have to create a
> database with information related to Path Busy, Service Time, Number of
> subchannels, sync and async requests, etc...
> And i could see similar information in several sections of SMF 74.4, which
> causes me confusion.
>
> Regards
> Ituriel
>
>
> Em quinta-feira, 11 de fevereiro de 2021 09:17:18 BRT, Colin Paice <
> colinpai...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>  You can get RMF to format most(all?) of these records.
> What high level analysis do you want to do?
> Colin
>
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 11:56, Ituriel do Neto <
> 03427ec2837d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > I'm trying to collect some information from SMF 74.4 and would like some
> > advice.I need to analyze data similar to Subchannel Activity Report does,
> > but i'm a little confused.
> > In SMF 74.4 there are several sections and, if possible, i would like to
> > know which one isused as the basis for RMF Subchannel Activity Report.
> > Thanks in Advance
> >
> > Best Regards
> > Ituriel do Nascimento NetoSystem Programmer
> >
> > --
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMF fields of RMF Subchannel Activity Report

2021-02-11 Thread Ituriel do Neto
 Hi Colin,
I do need the SMF fields, not the extraction from RMF. I have to create a 
database with information related to Path Busy, Service Time, Number of 
subchannels, sync and async requests, etc...
And i could see similar information in several sections of SMF 74.4, which 
causes me confusion.

Regards
Ituriel


Em quinta-feira, 11 de fevereiro de 2021 09:17:18 BRT, Colin Paice 
 escreveu:  
 
 You can get RMF to format most(all?) of these records.
What high level analysis do you want to do?
Colin

On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 11:56, Ituriel do Neto <
03427ec2837d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> Hi all,
> I'm trying to collect some information from SMF 74.4 and would like some
> advice.I need to analyze data similar to Subchannel Activity Report does,
> but i'm a little confused.
> In SMF 74.4 there are several sections and, if possible, i would like to
> know which one isused as the basis for RMF Subchannel Activity Report.
> Thanks in Advance
>
> Best Regards
> Ituriel do Nascimento NetoSystem Programmer
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
  

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMF fields of RMF Subchannel Activity Report

2021-02-11 Thread Colin Paice
You can get RMF to format most(all?) of these records.
What high level analysis do you want to do?
Colin

On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 11:56, Ituriel do Neto <
03427ec2837d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> Hi all,
> I'm trying to collect some information from SMF 74.4 and would like some
> advice.I need to analyze data similar to Subchannel Activity Report does,
> but i'm a little confused.
> In SMF 74.4 there are several sections and, if possible, i would like to
> know which one isused as the basis for RMF Subchannel Activity Report.
> Thanks in Advance
>
> Best Regards
> Ituriel do Nascimento NetoSystem Programmer
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


SMF fields of RMF Subchannel Activity Report

2021-02-11 Thread Ituriel do Neto
Hi all,
I'm trying to collect some information from SMF 74.4 and would like some 
advice.I need to analyze data similar to Subchannel Activity Report does, but 
i'm a little confused.
In SMF 74.4 there are several sections and, if possible, i would like to know 
which one isused as the basis for RMF Subchannel Activity Report.
Thanks in Advance

Best Regards
Ituriel do Nascimento NetoSystem Programmer

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: DB2 member to start on different LPAR

2021-02-11 Thread Radoslaw Skorupka

W dniu 11.02.2021 o 11:54, Bill Giannelli pisze:

Thank you for the information!
I think I was a little vague.
Let me explain further...
we have on LPAR1 DB2 Member1, on LPAR2 DB2 Member2. Both members of the same 
data sharing group.
I want to be able to start DB2 Member1 on LPAR2 and DB2 Member2 on LPAR1.



That sounds you *already have* parallel sysplex and DB2 in datasharing 
mode ("sysplexed").

And all you want is to replace system images:
z/OS A working on LPAR1, z/OS B working on LPAR2
And you want z/OS B on LPAR 1, z/OS A on LPAR2

I don't know what is the reason, but it seems feasible and not very hard 
to do.


--
Radoslaw Skorupka
(looking for new job)
Lodz, Poland

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: DB2 member to start on different LPAR

2021-02-11 Thread Bill Giannelli
Thank you for the information!
I think I was a little vague.
Let me explain further...
we have on LPAR1 DB2 Member1, on LPAR2 DB2 Member2. Both members of the same 
data sharing group.
I want to be able to start DB2 Member1 on LPAR2 and DB2 Member2 on LPAR1.
thanks
Bill

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: DB2 member to start on different LPAR

2021-02-11 Thread Attila Fogarasi
It depends ... there are many non-Db2 dependencies on things like shared
dasd (implies SMS definitions), Catalog structure, XCF signalling paths,
IRLM and your CF connectivity, etc.  Unless your shop has deliberately
setup multiple lpars to be compatible, chances are they will not be.  You
can even die on silly things like dump space.   A whole redbook on setting
up Db2 data sharing was written circa 15 years ago, so there is enough
material to fill a few hundred pages.  Might be wise to review it.  SSID
and RACF definitions are 1% of the solution.

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 9:17 PM Bill Giannelli 
wrote:

> We have DB2 data sharing and I have a need to start DB2 members on any
> LPAR.
> Aside from RACF definitions, is the only other item I need in place is the
> SSID symbol in SYS1.PARMLIB(IEFSSNxx) ?
> thanks
> Bill
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


DB2 member to start on different LPAR

2021-02-11 Thread Bill Giannelli
We have DB2 data sharing and I have a need to start DB2 members on any LPAR.
Aside from RACF definitions, is the only other item I need in place is the SSID 
symbol in SYS1.PARMLIB(IEFSSNxx) ?
thanks
Bill

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Enhancing our DR configuration

2021-02-11 Thread kekronbekron
Agree that all machines are better off in a single IODF.

In a site I was at, site1 was connected to both site1dasd and site2dasd.
However, only a few volumes from site2dasd were 'live' / accessible; the rest 
were PPRC targets from site1dasd.
Those site2dasd vols that were accessible from site1, were primary/secondary of 
some sort or data volumes for quick lookup of stuff from site2, if site1 went 
inaccessible.
I think even the live IODF was from site2dasd.
The above will depend on the distance b/w sites.

Example:
Primary RACF was hosted on site2dasd, secondary in site1dasd.

It's easy to think, therefore, "oh ok, CDSA in site1, CDSB in site2." This is 
to be avoided.
Each site should have its own set of locally resilient (keep them on separate, 
different volumes) CDSes.
Across multiple IBM TechDocs (which IBM has basically killed now), IBM 
recommends having separate CDSes for each site to ease various recovery 
scenarios.
Mark A Brooks has given some seriously incredibly sysplex-specific sessions in 
the recent SHAREs.


If your intent of having site2dasd accessible in site1 is to allow reads from 
both places this requires even more thinking, and is dependent on your 
replication technology.

If it is PPRC, even if the site1mainframes die, you could just go to the DS GUI 
or CSM to ESTPATH(2to1), ESTPAIR(2to1), DELPAIR(1to2), DELPATH(1to2), etc.
1to2 means primary to secondary and 2to1 vice versa.

I found it easy to have separate unit ranges for each site, odds for prod, even 
for DR, i.e., 1xxx, 3xxx, etc. for prod, 2xxx, 4xxx.
Will the extra subchannel sets, SuperPav, etc. and hopefully mod54s, running 
out of units won't be a problem.


You can interconnect storage & tape b/w sites using Brocade IPEX (I think?) or 
one of those Channel Extenders (SANxxx-xx-R).


If any corrections are required on what I've said above, do let me know 
(listers)!


- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, February 11, 2021 12:27 PM, Timothy Sipples  
wrote:

> Gadi Ben-Avi wrote:
>
> > What we want to do:
> > Allow the computers in the production site to use the DS8884
> > in the DR site. This is to allow us to continue working at the
> > production site if there is a catastrophic problem with the
> > DS8884 in the production site. When I spoke to our Storage
> > salesperson he told us that HyperSwap is the direction to go.
> > So I have some questions:
> > Is HyperSwap the right solution?
>
> The steps Radoslaw outlines are the rough prerequisites for HyperSwap, but
> it doesn't make much sense to me to make the effort then not enable
> HyperSwap.
>
> Here's the basic question to answer, though: considering your most
> demanding (most important) business service, end-to-end, what are your
> Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and Recovery Point Objective (RPO)?
> Ultimately your organization's top management answers this question,
> perhaps at the direction of regulators. And this is always about assuring
> end user service delivery. It doesn't matter if your IBM Z is deployed in
> a RTO=0/RPO=0 way if nobody can reach it when there's a disaster because
> there's one much less reliable server sitting in front that's supposed to
> be doing something and isn't. Fundamentally your RTO/RPO are constrained
> per the weakest link(s) in service delivery.
>
> Assuming HyperSwap is helpful or required to achieve your DR and HA
> objectives, there are several z/OS HyperSwap deployment variations, as
> this recent redbook explains:
>
> https://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg248431.pdf
>
> Is this the redbook that you already checked? One area where I might
> quibble with the redbook is that it seems to imply Parallel Sysplex is a
> prerequisite for HyperSwap. While Parallel Sysplexes are common and might
> also be helpful or required to achieve your RTO/RPO, they're not strictly
> necessary for HyperSwap deployments.
>
> Timothy Sipples
> I.T. Architect Executive
> Digital Asset & Other Industry Solutions
> IBM Z & LinuxONE
>
> E-Mail: sipp...@sg.ibm.com
>
> ---
>
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN