z/OS V2R5 is here!
Are you curious about the latest network and security updates with IBM Z?
Join the z/OS Communications Server Technical Update webinar and discover z/OS
V2R5 new highlights!
In this webinar, z/OS Communications Server architects Mike Fitzpatrick and Sam
Reynolds will
> On 16 Nov 2021, at 5:55 am, zMan wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Neither "Unformatted System Services" nor "Unix System Services" has or
> should have the word "screen".
> I dunno, after the many, Many, MANY times we've gone round on this I *want *to
> screen
>
+ 100
>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at
It works all the time from other z/OS clients, using the same userid. I just
logged on from a Windows FTP client using the same userid. It works from their
client to a different z/OS server, and no, I do not know what is different
between the two servers -- probably lots of little things -- I
They are missing part of the Anonymous config required or maybe the USS
directory was changed. When specifying Anonymous 3 you also have to
configure all of the access rights, looks like they did not :) It can
get pretty voluminous.
Does anyone know what the heck I should be looking for on this?
A customer running the z/OS FTP client is attempting to log into our FTP
server. The FTP client is ATTACHed dynamically with FTP -e -i -n
-f//DD:SYS00032 url.of.ftp.server
The FTP client is passed an INPUT file that begins
Take a look at SGRBLINK and SGRBLPA datasets. They replace SERBLINK and SERBLPA
that were used in previous releases of RMF.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com
‐‐‐ Original
> Neither "Unformatted System Services" nor "Unix System Services" has or
should have the word "screen".
I dunno, after the many, Many, MANY times we've gone round on this I *want *to
screen
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 12:32 PM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> Neither "Unformatted System Services" nor
Good afternoon everyone,
Two things that I noticed with z/OS 2.5 so far and I have a couple of questions
for the group.
Q1:
RMF would not start after the first IPL of z/OS 2.5.
The program ERBMFMFC is not in the SYS1.SERBLNKE library that came with z/OS
2.5.
I went looking for it and found it
Bob:
Thank you for that tip. After checking a few things, I found that that number
in col C is probably what those LPARs would have added up to in that line after
double-checking this against the other two P5 sections where capping took place
after the first hour past IPL.
So it appears that
Steve,
What does Column C have in each of these P5 sections?
I suspect it may have "1500". Even if it doesn't, use the value that is there
for each z/OS P5 segment and add them up.
For z/OS in that other spreadsheet, they probably want Column C's value for
z/OS in each P5 segment placed in
I am having a headache with SCRT (SCRT 28.2, SC23-6845-19 is the
manual I have).
Background -- I got moved to the z/VM side of the house doing
Capacity Management and Planning so I've mostly been gone from
z/OS for a while. I had already been doing true-ups for other
ISVs, and so when
Perfect THANKS Dave!!! All fixed
Ms Terri E Shaffer
Senior Systems Engineer,
z/OS Support:
ACIWorldwide – Telecommuter
H(412-766-2697) C(412-519-2592)
terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Dave Jousma
Sent: Monday, November
On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 15:59:13 +, Shaffer, Terri
wrote:
>Hi,
> Just recently upgraded my test lpar to z/OS 2.5 and Tn3270 is displaying an
> error. It still connects and I can logon but this?
>
>$HASP373 TN3270 STARTED
>IEF403I TN3270 - STARTED - TIME=09.13.27
>IEE252I MEMBER CTIEZBTN
Thanks, my original errors was because I didn’t configure TLS correctly in my
PAGENT profile.. So I fixed the other 3 TN3270 profile issues with TLS and
Ports.
Lastly I was left with the 6013 error.
I just checked unless there is DD or something, All my users in RACF can READ
SYS1.SCUNTBL,
Neither "Unformatted System Services" nor "Unix System Services" has or should
have the word "screen". USS in VTAM determines the appropriate logmode for an
unformatted logon. USS for TN3270 includes equivalent functionality; Unix
System Services is what used to be MVS Open Edition in 1993, two
I had something similar to this issue, and it was because the TN3270 Started
task couldn't access the sys1.scun* datasets, mainly SYS1.SCUNTBL
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Tony Thigpen
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 12:11 PM
To:
You SSL ports failed because LE could not be initialized. Your regular
ports will work anyway.
Tony Thigpen
Shaffer, Terri wrote on 11/15/21 10:59 AM:
Hi,
Just recently upgraded my test lpar to z/OS 2.5 and Tn3270 is displaying an
error. It still connects and I can logon but this?
Hi,
Just recently upgraded my test lpar to z/OS 2.5 and Tn3270 is displaying an
error. It still connects and I can logon but this?
$HASP373 TN3270 STARTED
IEF403I TN3270 - STARTED - TIME=09.13.27
IEE252I MEMBER CTIEZBTN FOUND IN SYS1.IBM.PARMLIB
EZZ6035I TN3270 DEBUG TASK EXCEPTION 145
I wanted to verify that I ordered it correctly before I go off and open a
ticket. This is from my ShopZ order.
Installation Method
z/OSMF SW Management
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:42 AM Kurt J. Quackenbush
wrote:
> > I ordered z/OS 2.5 as a Workload installation via z/OSMF.
> > All of the
> I ordered z/OS 2.5 as a Workload installation via z/OSMF.
> All of the documentation I received was for installing via the Dialogs.
> I've followed all the directions for making sure z/OSMF was ready to use
> Workloads, but I can not find any documentation on using z/OSMF to
install
> z/OS 2.5.
I ordered z/OS 2.5 as a Workload installation via z/OSMF.
All of the documentation I received was for installing via the Dialogs.
I've followed all the directions for making sure z/OSMF was ready to use
Workloads, but I can not find any documentation on using z/OSMF to install
z/OS 2.5.
--
The
Prior to IBM introducing OMVS to z/OS, the term USS was used by VTAM as the
acronym for Unformatted System Services. Once OMVS was introduced, I do seem
to remember a bit of discussion on the use of USS, as VTAM folks used it, and
it was starting to be used by the folks pushing for more use of
22 matches
Mail list logo
