Re: z/OS 3.1 documentation

2023-10-14 Thread Brian Westerman
I figured out my problem with getting Tom's process to work.  My folders are 
all set as ReadOnly because OneDrive was running.  I ended Onedrive and while 
all the folders still show as readonly, they aren't really any more and the 
process ran fine, after which I turned OneDrive on again.

I finally remembered that I had to do this last time as well.  This time I made 
a note so that I don't have to look dumb (again).

Brian

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: DFDSS RFE - Please read / vote

2023-10-14 Thread Jousma, David
Mark,

I have the same cloning process as you logically.   I know exactly the problem 
you face.   Your rfe makes sense.

I get around it by cloning at the volume level, but there is always the outlier 
that needs to be cloned by itself, or the once in awhile fix that needs to be 
made.When I run into that I either rename then delete the enqueued dataset 
via ispf, and then reload, or if the dataset is actually in use validly, I use 
idcams to delete all members, compress, then reload via iebcopy.

There is a restore with tol(enqf) I believe too.

Dave Jousma

Vice President | Director, Technology Engineering


Fifth Third Bank  |  1830 East Paris Ave, SE  |  MD RSCB2H  |  Grand Rapids, MI 
49546

616.653.8429

From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of 
Mark Zelden 
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2023 10:55:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU 
Subject: Re: DFDSS RFE - Please read / vote

On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 15: 31: 42 -0500, Mark Zelden  wrote: 
I've had some offline responses also. Including the suggestion to use 
TOLERATE(ENQFAILURE) which only applies to the input dataset. Let me explain 
again and show


On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 15:31:42 -0500, Mark Zelden  wrote:

I've had some offline responses also. Including the suggestion to use 
TOLERATE(ENQFAILURE)
 which only applies to the input dataset.  Let me explain again and show all 
the DFDSS control cards.

I have an "program products" sysres that is an extension of IBM OS sysres. 
There is a maintenance
version of that sysres, just like you have a maintenance IBM sysres that you 
apply SMP/E maintenance
to.  The PP sysres gets cloned along with the IBM sysres via full volume disk 
to disk copies. That is not
a problem.

That program products sysres (really 2 3390-27 volumes) has perhaps 40 IBM / 
ISV products.
All the datasets are indirectly catalogued via   Program product SMP/E 
target libs are copied
(and renamed during the copy) to the PP maintenance sysres at various time.  
When maintenance
for any give product is applied (or an upgrade) and is ready to roll out the 
sysprog copies
the SMP/E targets to this maintenance sysres.  So think of it as a volume were 
changes are staged for
production.  Then after cloning, the changes are rolled out as a package, be it 
with IBM OS maintenance,
one product, several products, or any combination like that.   This is done via 
rolling IPLs in
a sysplex environment so as not to cause any application outages (usually half 
the LPARs one
month, the other half the next month).   Almost every product's main loadlib is 
in the LNKLST - at
least anything that has associated production JCL, TSO CLISTs / EXECs, ISPxLIBs 
etc.  If something is only
used by an STC, it may not be in the LNKLST. This is to shield anyone from 
having to make
JCL changes etc. (pretty standard stuff, right?).

So many of these datasets being "staged" prior to cloning are ENQed.  If the 
input library
in the copy is larger than the one on the maintenance sysres volume, that is 
when DFDSS
fails.  If it doesn't have to scratch / reallocate the dataset that already 
exists to make it
larger to accommodate the input data set size,  it works fine.

Here is a sample of the copy process with DFDSS, only there would be many more
libraries copied / renamed than just a single one for almost all products.  
(another shortcoming
of DFDSS compared to FDRCOPY where only the HLQ can be renamed and FDRCOPY can
rename the hlq plus add / remove nodes for multiple datasets - dozens if I 
needed,  in a single
control statement, but I digress...)

//SYSINDD  *
 COPY DS( -
   INCLUDE( -
smphlq.product.V6R3.LINKLIB -
   )  -
)  -
  RENAMEU( -
   (smphlq.product.V6R3.LINKLIB -
  prodhlq.product.LINKLIB)-
 ) -
  SHARE TOL(ENQF)   PROCESS(SYS1) -
  BYPASSACS(**)   -
  NULLSTORCLAS-
  LIDY(inpvol)-
  OUTDYNAM(outvol,SYSALLDA)   -
  REPLACEUNCONDITIONAL -
  WAIT(2,2)  ALLDATA(*)  ALLEXCP
/*

If prodhlq.product.LINKLIB is ENQed (in this case you can presume it is due to 
being in the LNKLST on the driving system), you get this error:

ADR497E (001)-CATLG(07), A CATALOG ERROR OCCURRED WHILE DELETING UNCATALOGED 
DATA SET prodhlq.product.LINKLIB. RETURN CODE IS 102, REASON
CODE IS FP-007

ERROR OCCURRED WHILE DELETING UNCATALOGED DATA SET


** VOTE here by clicking the vote icon at the top left!
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://ibm-z-hardware-and-operating-systems.ideas.ibm.com/ideas/ZOS-I-3862__;!!MwwqYLOC6b6whF7V!l88xZXKbWy57EEOicntO2a0U2-ASRLcj7Ya5t5ggE89_A6unfsAePPoZPdaeGWNpUinbleEiMkvaePQ$

Regards,  Mark

>Sorry for top posting...
>
>Let's address your comments one keyword at a time:
>
>DELETE - deletes the source (input) dataset.  Ouch!  Lets not delete my SMP/E 
>target libs during copy to my sysres set please!
>
>PURGE -  overlays an output dataset that has an expiration date not yet 
>reached.  Not applicable.
>
>UNCOND -  no such parm