IBM

2023-12-12 Thread Dave Beagle
IBM stock is hitting new 52 week highs today. The mainframe is dead, long live the mainframe. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO

Re: RACROUTE REQUEST=AUTH problem

2023-12-12 Thread John Blythe Reid
The client's quite happy now as it works with EXEC CICS QUERY SECURITY. We were only able to get a RC=0 on our own LPAR. On the client's LPAR it was a hard error. It always gave this response combination no matter which class and resource they tried: SAF_RC=04 RACF_RC=04 RACF_RSN=00 Regards,

Re: RACROUTE REQUEST=AUTH problem

2023-12-12 Thread Binyamin Dissen
Well, under CICS - except perhaps L8 which might set a TCB level ACEE, you are not going to get the users permission, you will be getting the CICS STC permission. So the answer will be wrong. I am not sure which CICS control block contains the ACEE pointer, but if you are already going to do an

Re: SQA overflow condition

2023-12-12 Thread Peter
Are there any tools available in cbttape to view 78-2 ? On Tue, Dec 12, 2023, 2:01 PM Martin Packer wrote: > Right. To Allan’s point it’s CSA that shows up by key. Though SQA subpools > are in the 78-2. > > I also agree with Paul’s point that a longitudinal view can prove helpful. > Even Time

Re: SQA overflow condition

2023-12-12 Thread Martin Packer
Right. To Allan’s point it’s CSA that shows up by key. Though SQA subpools are in the 78-2. I also agree with Paul’s point that a longitudinal view can prove helpful. Even Time Of Day could be helpful. Even comparing one system to another, likewise. Cheers, Martin From: IBM Mainframe

Re: RACROUTE REQUEST=AUTH problem

2023-12-12 Thread John Blythe Reid
Thanks Binyamin, Here are the macros: RACROUTE REQUEST=AUTH, CLASS=(R2), ENTITY=((R3),NONE), STATUS=ACCESS, WORKA=(R5), RELEASE=1.9, MF=(E,(R1)) RACLST