re?
>
> Regards,
>
> Mike
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Laurence Chiu
> Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2019 12:18 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Remote access to Z14 ZR1 Sup
______
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf
> of Laurence Chiu
> Sent: 21 March 2019 18:45
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Remote access to Z14 ZR1 Support Element via HMC question
>
> Thanks
>
> We did do a major HMC firmware up
Did you also see the information about the
> new IP addresses that need to be accessed through your firewall so the z14
> can contact the new "Enhanced" Support Center?
>
> Regards,
>
> Mike
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
your zBC12 HMC hardware
> is of the right spec, then there is nothing to stop you upgrading it to the
> same level code as the z14 ZR1 HMC.
>
> Regards
> Parwez
>
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf
> of Laurence Chiu
I used a B6700 at University and I became a fan of WFL, Algol, DCAlgol and
Espol (student). In fact I wrote a parser for a Linear Programming language
using Algol. I actually designed the language using BNF and parsed the
statements that way. The only alternatives I have found to Algol (Burroughs
ust wonder if other folks
on this list have ever encountered problems similar to this? Thanks
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 2:55 PM Laurence Chiu wrote:
> Thanks
>
> Looking at this list and the firewall requests that have been raised, it
> seems we're covered.
>
> Interesting as noted
and 2300 to be opened. But in the current doc,
> port 2300 is not referenced, so I don't recall what that was for.
>
> Your other question about accessing the SE's, I would say that wouldn't
> be neccessary very much at all on
This is the situation
We are replacing our zBC12 with a Z14 ZR1 which is DR machine. It will
connect to the same SAN as the zBC12 and we want to run the same LPAR
configuration and of course the same IOCDS.
Our support folks are trying to do the work remotely(externally) and are
getting stuck
Looking at implementing a parallel Sysplex primarily to support CICS
regions that need to be up on more than one LPAR.
But some of the regions are not Sysplex compliant so we'll run them on one
LPAR only.
But we have a number of batch jobs that calls CICS transactions in those
regions and we are
I think Dave will provide better information but I'm researching the same
thing myself and found this document useful.
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpieces/abstracts/sg248241.html?Open
On Sat, Mar 2, 2019, 9:12 AM Mark Regan wrote:
> Cross posting to both IBM-MAIN and IBMTCP-L
>
> I'm
We do something similar except because our locations are only 80km apart we
can run Metro Mirror.
To do DR we flash to tertiary volumes using a small Z LPAR but looking at
changing that to using CSM with practice volumes as per this video from the
Washington Systems Center.
We ordered our ZR1 with 96G of memory since that was recommended based on
our planned usage and growth.
Not sure how much was the memory component but small in terms of the other
components.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019, 8:32 AM Michael Babcock wrote:
> When we ordered our ZR1 we still had to specify
I might be posting twice here but I've been reading the list via Google
Groups and posting there not realizing that the posts don't necessary hit
the mailing list. So I've done the proper thing and subscribed to the list.
Sorry for any confusion.
Anyway when I started DR planning and Sysplex I
101 - 113 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
