Dedicated LPAR team has access to the HMC for IPL only
There seems to be bit settings in the RBCPCDB that indicated if the capacity
data is shareable or not
Any directions for taking control of this situation
Avram FRIEDMAN
DB2 V8 and z/OS 2.2 is a hopeful combination.
Disregard the vendor support experts
And look at it this way
DB2 V10 allowed for skip migration from V8
V10 CM mode is 100% compatable with V8
V10 is supported today and run with z/OS 2.2
So
Thank you for being a long term DB2 customer.
If you are
words like LPAR and DB2 the issues are not the same.
Avram Friedman
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
monitors.
Avram Friedman
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 10:46:40 -0400, Pinnacle <pinnc...@rochester.rr.com> wrote:
>Gone are the halcyon days when we could run an LPAR with three mod-3's
>as the local paging subsystem. With today's large memory sizes, I'm
>faced with having to completely re
required by software (so compares work) may be different than
those required by I/O devices such as ASCII terminials.
Avram Friedman
>
>-Original Message-
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
>Behalf Of william janulin
>Sent: Monday, Ap
On Sun, 9 Apr 2017 15:48:12 +, Lindy Mayfield <lindy.mayfi...@sas.com>
wrote:
The easy answer is no it is not reasonable to think that.
Min elapsed time
=
corrected recorded CPU time
/
# CPs
Avram Friedman
>This may or may not be the dumbest question I've asked this week, but I'
o know there is a DB2-L (I am an administrator of that list)
But considered this to be a better place to ask this particular question.
Avram Friedman
>On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 10:55:17 -0500, Avram Friedman wrote:
>
>>(From about PUT1106 to date)
>
>What release are you running? I ask
I am supporting a shop with active IBM an active software service contract but
no Software Excel / IBM link.
In such an environment how does a USA customer order preventive service and
enhanced hold data.
(From about PUT1106 to date)
Thank you
Av Friedman
.
The issue here is IBM did not follow its own book mark advice which is designed
to avoid problems like this.
A failure of highly trained TECH writters and proofers.
Avram Friedman
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 13:59:56 +0800, Timothy Sipples sipp...@sg.ibm.com wrote:
If you need to get to the correct page
version of IMS under zos 1.13.
They tend not to run them with high volume complex workloads and also do not
really do any mesurable work on a day to day basis.
Avram Friedman
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
was an option as well as default
security.
As an historical asside many early IMS shops did not use default security
because it was too restrictive.
An IMS upgrade beyond V9 is difficult to the extent that SMU is used.
Avram Friedman
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 05:35:23 -0500, Vince Getgood getgo...@hotmail.com
11 matches
Mail list logo
