On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 23:07:53 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In 2502068772076383.wa.rashapoogmail@listserv.ua.edu, on
02/24/2015
at 03:32 PM, Govind Chettiar rasha...@gmail.com said:
On zOS if I try
f r'([0-9]{4})(\w+)'
A while back I looked at the new
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:20:21 -0600, Jon Butler jon.but...@fepoc.com wrote:
I can use regular expressions, but the generic attributes such as \d for any
digit do not appear to work in ISPF. If I use FIND r'\([0-9]\)' I can find
the string (9), but if I use FIND r'\(\d\)' I can not.
For me
Hi
Is it possible to find out what jobs were running at a given point in time or
within a given time interval, say, between 10 and 11 pm? We use OPC scheduler
and IOF (not SDSF)
Thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 10:37:01 -0500, Aled Hughes aledlhug...@aol.com wrote:
According to the UK's Daily Mail, COBOL programmers are commanding 'big money'
especially some of the retired ones. I suspect some of the so-called salaries
are contractor rated. £50,000 (about US $76K) works out at less
Since I'm having some difficulty with the quote option, copy-pasting this
content
We are currently using JRIO (last supported release will be JAVA7). The
replacement is the JZOS Toolkit (under application development at this time).
The application connects to a JAVA applet on the mainframe.
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 10:39:03 -0400, Bill Ashton bill00ash...@gmail.com wrote:
If you need near-time or real-time access to the data, I would recommend
you look at CA Technologies product called VSAM Transparency for
Datacom/DB. Having used this for a lot of years, it was great. The
20-second
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Govind Chettiar
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 6:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Accessing VSAM Data from non-zOS platform
Hello,
Would like some insight from people who have tried it on how to get to VSAM
data
on zOS from non zOS platforms. I
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:45:44 +, Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh
vignesh.v.sankaranaraya...@marks-and-spencer.com wrote:
I imagine this is the norm for today because a well-educated, intelligent,
worker costs a lot more than a pre-programmed drone.
As a result, the industry is now flooded with
[...]
When an upgrade to zOS 2.1 is performed is one automatically at Cobol 5.1 as
well?
Well, IT DEPENDS.
AFAIK you cannot order downlevel COBOL. So, when you order z/OS 2.1 now
and you also order COBOL - you will get 5.1 version.
In general you can order only current versions of the
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:24:05 +, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
Hi All,
I learned via PMR that Rational Developer for System z (RDz) v9.x (latest
greatest) does not officially support Enterprise COBOL v5.1. The
workaround suggested by RDz Support was to specify COBOL v4.2 and
On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 07:40:37 -0500, Govind Chettiar rasha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 18:51:47 +, MARTIN, MIKE mike.mar...@ncsecu.org
wrote:
All,
We have a z114 and are upgrading to Windows 7. Is anyone using a 3270
emulator other than PCOMM for their OSA-ICC console
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 18:51:47 +, MARTIN, MIKE mike.mar...@ncsecu.org wrote:
All,
We have a z114 and are upgrading to Windows 7. Is anyone using a 3270
emulator other than PCOMM for their OSA-ICC console functions.
Mike Martin
Reflection/Attachmate
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 07:25:35 -0400, Richards, Robert B.
robert.richa...@opm.gov wrote:
Hank,
Thanks for the heads up about Doug. I still use his tools on a daily basis.
Tools such as ISRFIND, ISRDDN, and TASID to name a few.
Thank you, Doug, for your contribution to ISPF's usefulness and my
made motley
contributions, some [but not too much] context is necessary. Trimming
is good; evisceration is bad.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
On 1/31/14, Govind Chettiar rasha...@gmail.com wrote:
I would respectfully disagree with this somewhat blanket statement. Many is
the time I'd
I would respectfully disagree with this somewhat blanket statement. Many is
the time I'd have liked my ISPF Editor session in one window and the compiler
output in another so I can fix the syntax errors etc easily w/o having to F2
back and forth all the time. This is just one example.
Great reply, thanks for clarifying all that. At my place we don't have
sysplex, but I'll check with contractor whether they had multiple LPARS and a
SYSPLEX in his last workplace.
I did start reading Mark's $SNGLTSO document but was lost very quickly!
Regards
Not ashamed to acknowledge my ignorance here but I'm not fully able to follow
discussions of separate images or shared environments. If this chap says
he had up to 4 TSO sessions, but was working on the same datasets and so on,
would they have been different LPARs. Aren't two LPARs like two
A contractor who joined our team said that in his previous place of employment
he could have multiple TSO sessions each of which used the same userid and
password, so he used to have multiple instances of his TN3270 emulator running
and a different TSO session in each.
I am curious to know how
It's pretty creativity-stifling to work in a company where the threat of being
fired looms. If one works for a firm that has annual RIFs just as a matter of
practice and one is constantly in fear of setting a foot wrong lest one get on
that list, then one is not going to do anything more than
Thanks for confirming, Massimo.
We are providing data to a vendor of a big data product who requested that we
use these options for the FTP so wanted to be sure I was doing it right.
Regards
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Hi,
I'd appreciate any information on the usage of RDW option when ftp'ing a file
from the host (MVS) to a workstation. Per the manual this is the definition
RDW Specifies that Variable Record Descriptors (RDW) are treated as if they
were part of the record and not discarded during ftp
Hi all,
I am calling a Cobol subroutine from an Easytrieve program. Is there a known
limit to the amount of data that can be exchanged in this scenario?
I'm running into two limitations
We wrote test programs to test easytrieve calling a sub program with a linkage
section of 44,000 bytes.
Not really one of the greatest rivalries anymore...With the diminishing
interest in Test cricket and the surfeit of ODIs and, worse, T20s, I think Test
cricket might be going the way of the IBM Mainframe.
--
For IBM-MAIN
23 matches
Mail list logo
