Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-07 Thread Don Leahy
> > > > ____________ > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on > > behalf of R.S. > > > Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 5:25 AM > > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > > Subject: Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: S

Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-07 Thread Joe Monk
t; > > > > -- > > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > > > > > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on > behalf of R.S. > > Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 5:25 AM > > To: IBM-MAIN@

Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-07 Thread R.S.
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years? W dniu 05.08.2020 o 17:07, Seymour J Metz pisze: Must you be so obtuse? The structure that they devised is extremely hard to change. Look at how long it took for everyone to switch from the

Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-06 Thread Seymour J Metz
PKB -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of R.S. Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 5:25 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All

Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-06 Thread PINION, RICHARD W.
Touche! -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S. Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 5:25 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years? [External Email. Exercise caution when clicking links or

Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-06 Thread R.S.
W dniu 05.08.2020 o 17:07, Seymour J Metz pisze: Must you be so obtuse? The structure that they devised is extremely hard to change. Look at how long it took for everyone to switch from the Julian Calendar to the Gregorian calendar. Yes, Europe has had treaties, and before the ones that you me

Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-05 Thread Edward Finnell
Having a written constitution helps set the foundation for our Republic. It's pretty straightforward. The Feds are charged with controlling 'enumerated' responsibilities. The states are responsible for everything else. Where the boundaries overlap or converge the courts decide. This is not a fin

Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-05 Thread Mike Schwab
; > > From: Seymour J Metz > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Date: 05/08/2020 15:02 > Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL > After All These Years? > Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List > > > > Contrast the US

Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-05 Thread Bob Bridges
The thing many non-Americans don't understand (and many Americans, too, I'm afraid) is that the states in the USA are not provinces. They're called "states" because they were individual countries that decided to form a ~partial~ union. The US Constitution defines what are the powers of the Federa

Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-05 Thread Seymour J Metz
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Martin Packer [martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2020 11:02 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years? Except speed limits only became a

Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-05 Thread Seymour J Metz
R.S. [r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl] Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2020 10:28 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years? No colonies were involved in speed limits. We agreed and standarized a lot of things long before EU membe

Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-05 Thread Martin Packer
rformance-topics/id1127943573?mt=2 Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCu_65HaYgksbF6Q8SQ4oOvA From: Seymour J Metz To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Date: 05/08/2020 15:02 Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years? Sent by:

Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-05 Thread Mike Schwab
proved. > > > > > > -- > > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > > > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of > > R.S. [r.skoru...@bremultibank

Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-05 Thread R.S.
Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of R.S. [r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl] Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2020 8:16 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years? Federal limits, state limits... This is something

Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-05 Thread Seymour J Metz
Subject: Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years? Federal limits, state limits... This is something I don't understand. Standarization is good thing and common rules are easier to follow. I just checked - 85mph in Texas, even for trucks. And 55mph in District of Col

Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-05 Thread Seymour J Metz
ssion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Martin Packer [martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2020 9:14 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years? I think what baffles the rest of the world is the point

Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-05 Thread Seymour J Metz
el (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of R.S. [r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl] Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2020 9:26 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: OT: OOBOL and E

Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-05 Thread Mohammad Khan
Once the argument over who has what powers became really hot :) MKK On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 08:04:37 -0500, Joe Monk wrote: >"Federal limits, state limits... This is something I don't understand." > >It is a concept called federalism. The state has certain powers, and the >federal government has cert

Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-05 Thread R.S.
So they make pointless differences because they can. Bingo. You know we (Poland) are independent country and we have some kind of states (województwo), but driving rules are common and much more similiar to other countries in EU than your states one to another. And we have the same voltage and f

Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-05 Thread Martin Packer
OBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years? Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List "Federal limits, state limits... This is something I don't understand." It is a concept called federalism. The state has certain powers, and the federal government has c

Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-05 Thread Joe Monk
"Federal limits, state limits... This is something I don't understand." It is a concept called federalism. The state has certain powers, and the federal government has certain powers. Joe On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 7:16 AM R.S. wrote: > Federal limits, state limits... This is something I d

Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-05 Thread R.S.
Federal limits, state limits... This is something I don't understand. Standarization is good thing and common rules are easier to follow. I just checked - 85mph in Texas, even for trucks. And 55mph in District of Columbia (not to mention Guam). From the other hand Residential Areas limits vary f

OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-04 Thread Bob Bridges
Technically the 55mph limit wasn't a federal law; Rex is right that speed limits are set and enforced by each state. But in the '70s Congress (the Federal Congress) passed a law that Federal highway money would not be forthcoming to states that allowed their speed limits to exceed 55mph. Most

Re: [OT] OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-07-23 Thread Tom Brennan
Worth watching, thanks! Usually I'd rather read than listen, but this guy really moves along. That's about half an hour of info packed into 12 minutes. On 7/23/2020 6:17 PM, Tony Thigpen wrote: I know this has just about run it's course, but I came across this interesting youtube video about

Re: [OT] OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-07-23 Thread Tony Thigpen
I know this has just about run it's course, but I came across this interesting youtube video about "why the US did not adopt the metric system" by a legitimate historian. https://youtu.be/yseldOMcT4Q Tony Thigpen Bob Bridges wrote on 7/23/20 10:13 AM: I would be willing to follow such a conv

Re: [OT] OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-07-23 Thread Bob Bridges
I would be willing to follow such a convention, if there's a consensus for it, or possibly even if it's requested by only a few. Personally I enjoy such discussions - obviously - but I can see not everyone would. But what constitutes OT? These things have recently started with a discussion of

Re: [OT] OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-07-22 Thread kekronbekron
Quick poll for the list: Can we all follow a 'rule' that says [OT] must be added in all off-topic discussions, so we can filter them out if required? - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, July 23, 2020 9:38 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: > That explains why the term used in the 19th C