Re: AMATERSE NOT FOUND

2017-11-10 Thread Tony Harminc
On 10 November 2017 at 11:57, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: > I don't recall any mention of z/OS level in this thread. AMATERSE has been in > the base for years but not forever. Could we be dealing a very old release? The OP said "We use OS V 2.1 ." Tony H.

Re: AMATERSE NOT FOUND

2017-11-10 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
-715-0595 Mobile 626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW robin...@sce.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike Schwab Sent: Friday, November 10, 2017 10:24 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):Re: AMATERSE NOT FOUND

Re: AMATERSE NOT FOUND

2017-11-10 Thread Mike Schwab
; From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Karl S Huf > Sent: Friday, November 10, 2017 6:51 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: (External):Re: AMATERSE NOT FOUND > > Agreeing with both Skip and Ed here - missing AMATERSE would concern

Re: AMATERSE NOT FOUND

2017-11-10 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW robin...@sce.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Karl S Huf Sent: Friday, November 10, 2017 6:51 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):Re: AMATERSE NOT FOUND Agreeing with both Skip

Re: AMATERSE NOT FOUND

2017-11-09 Thread Edward Finnell
Yeah, I'm with Skip on this. MIGLIB is an important DSN. Could it be you're using VOL=SER= to a back level copy? Just fishing..   Alternatively can use DAF to look for dinkers.   In a message dated 11/9/2017 12:32:49 PM Central Standard Time, jesse1.robin...@sce.com writes:   I find the

Re: AMATERSE NOT FOUND

2017-11-09 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW robin...@sce.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of John McKown Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2017 9:32 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):Re: AMATERSE NOT FOUND On Thu, Nov 9, 2017

Re: AMATERSE NOT FOUND

2017-11-09 Thread John McKown
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Paul Gilmartin < 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 11:07:27 +0200, ITschak Mugzach wrote: > > >So try SMP/E 3.2 to find where it is, or regenerate the mod. > > > Is there a function in 3.2 to search all (catalogued?) data

Re: AMATERSE NOT FOUND

2017-11-09 Thread ITschak Mugzach
Or isrddn. Tupe Link to list linklist dataseta abd theb member x. Itschak בתאריך 9 בנוב׳ 2017 6:00 אחה״צ,‏ "Paul Gilmartin" < 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> כתב: > On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 11:07:27 +0200, ITschak Mugzach wrote: > > >So try SMP/E 3.2 to find where it is, or

Re: AMATERSE NOT FOUND

2017-11-09 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 11:07:27 +0200, ITschak Mugzach wrote: >So try SMP/E 3.2 to find where it is, or regenerate the mod. > Is there a function in 3.2 to search all (catalogued?) data sets for a mamber name? DDLIST MEMBER will do that, but only for allocated data sets, and it ignores UNIX

Re: AMATERSE NOT FOUND

2017-11-09 Thread John Eells
Elardus Engelbrecht wrote: johnnydeep san wrote: I'm getting error "AMATERSE NOT FOUND" while unpack my received file . I couldn't find "AMATERSE" member in any of the LIB in LNKLST, We use OS V 2.1 . While googling i found AMATERSE is a base element come alo

Re: AMATERSE NOT FOUND

2017-11-09 Thread Philippe TESSIER
wrote: > >> I'm getting error "AMATERSE NOT FOUND" while unpack my received file . I >> couldn't find "AMATERSE" member in any of the LIB in LNKLST, We use OS V >> 2.1 . > >> While googling i found AMATERSE is a base element come along

Re: AMATERSE NOT FOUND

2017-11-09 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
johnnydeep san wrote: >I'm getting error "AMATERSE NOT FOUND" while unpack my received file . I >couldn't find "AMATERSE" member in any of the LIB in LNKLST, We use OS V 2.1 >. >While googling i found AMATERSE is a base element come along with OS. >

Re: AMATERSE NOT FOUND

2017-11-09 Thread ITschak Mugzach
> > > AMATERSE should be in SYS1.MIGLIB > > > > Gadi > > > > -Original Message- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > > Behalf Of johnnydeep san > > Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 10:40 AM >

Re: AMATERSE NOT FOUND

2017-11-09 Thread johnnydeep san
t; Behalf Of johnnydeep san > Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 10:40 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: AMATERSE NOT FOUND > > Hi , > > I'm getting error "AMATERSE NOT FOUND" while unpack my received file . > I couldn't find "AMATERSE" member

Re: AMATERSE NOT FOUND

2017-11-09 Thread גדי בן אבי
AMATERSE should be in SYS1.MIGLIB Gadi -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of johnnydeep san Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 10:40 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: AMATERSE NOT FOUND Hi , I'm getting error

AMATERSE NOT FOUND

2017-11-09 Thread johnnydeep san
Hi , I'm getting error "AMATERSE NOT FOUND" while unpack my received file . I couldn't find "AMATERSE" member in any of the LIB in LNKLST, We use OS V 2.1 . While googling i found AMATERSE is a base element come along with OS. But it's not there , is it problem with O