Re: Allocating GDG(+1) using SVC 99

2020-06-22 Thread Stuart Holland
The same happened when CA bought Uccel. All of the UCCnn messages became CA-nn. On 6/21/20 12:41 PM, Tom Brennan wrote: Side note:  I had to chuckle when I first saw "NDM" replaced in all the messages and screens with "C:D". Hey, a 3 character replace and we're done without having to worry abo

Re: Allocating GDG(+1) using SVC 99

2020-06-21 Thread Tom Brennan
Side note: I had to chuckle when I first saw "NDM" replaced in all the messages and screens with "C:D". Hey, a 3 character replace and we're done without having to worry about strings getting longer or shorter :) On 6/21/2020 10:24 AM, Steve Thompson wrote: Managed File Transfer. NDM, is one

Re: Allocating GDG(+1) using SVC 99

2020-06-21 Thread Steve Thompson
ent: Sunday, June 21, 2020 9:33 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Allocating GDG(+1) using SVC 99 > > From MFT days SVC99 alloc in a JOB is not treated the same as INIT ALLOC > (JCL). It has been a while since I’ve had to know this stuff and memory gets > hazy. Th

Re: Allocating GDG(+1) using SVC 99

2020-06-21 Thread Seymour J Metz
N@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Allocating GDG(+1) using SVC 99 From MFT days SVC99 alloc in a JOB is not treated the same as INIT ALLOC (JCL). It has been a while since I’ve had to know this stuff and memory gets hazy. Throw in VTS and there may be nuances that I’ve not been exposed to.

Re: Allocating GDG(+1) using SVC 99

2020-06-21 Thread Steve Thompson
From MFT days SVC99 alloc in a JOB is not treated the same as INIT ALLOC (JCL). It has been a while since I’ve had to know this stuff and memory gets hazy. Throw in VTS and there may be nuances that I’ve not been exposed to. “Roll in” occurs when you dealloc when doing SVC99. If using TA

Re: Allocating GDG(+1) using SVC 99

2020-06-21 Thread Joseph Reichman
Going to to try it now but it seems logical that the system updates it ( the relative number after the dataset is unallocated ) As from what I remember in multi step job Where the GDG is explicitly allocated the GDG number gets updates only after completion of the entire job Thanks > On J

Re: Allocating GDG(+1) using SVC 99

2020-06-21 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 01:02:41 -0400 Joseph Reichman wrote: :>I am doing a number of snapx type dumps in a started task. I would like to :>keep each and every one in a separate dsn. It would seem keeping them in a :>GDG would accomplish this. :>The Documentation says that If I turn on S99GDGNT in

Allocating GDG(+1) using SVC 99

2020-06-20 Thread Joseph Reichman
I am doing a number of snapx type dumps in a started task. I would like to keep each and every one in a separate dsn. It would seem keeping them in a GDG would accomplish this. The Documentation says that If I turn on S99GDGNT in S99FLAG1 I could specify the dsn as MYSDUMP.GDG(+1) and have eac