The same happened when CA bought Uccel. All of the UCCnn messages became
CA-nn.
On 6/21/20 12:41 PM, Tom Brennan wrote:
Side note: I had to chuckle when I first saw "NDM" replaced in all
the messages and screens with "C:D". Hey, a 3 character replace and
we're done without having to worry abo
Side note: I had to chuckle when I first saw "NDM" replaced in all the
messages and screens with "C:D". Hey, a 3 character replace and we're
done without having to worry about strings getting longer or shorter :)
On 6/21/2020 10:24 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
Managed File Transfer. NDM, is one
ent: Sunday, June 21, 2020 9:33 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Allocating GDG(+1) using SVC 99
>
> From MFT days SVC99 alloc in a JOB is not treated the same as INIT ALLOC
> (JCL). It has been a while since I’ve had to know this stuff and memory gets
> hazy. Th
N@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Allocating GDG(+1) using SVC 99
From MFT days SVC99 alloc in a JOB is not treated the same as INIT ALLOC
(JCL). It has been a while since I’ve had to know this stuff and memory gets
hazy. Throw in VTS and there may be nuances that I’ve not been exposed to.
From MFT days SVC99 alloc in a JOB is not treated the same as INIT ALLOC
(JCL). It has been a while since I’ve had to know this stuff and memory gets
hazy. Throw in VTS and there may be nuances that I’ve not been exposed to.
“Roll in” occurs when you dealloc when doing SVC99.
If using TA
Going to to try it now but it seems logical that the system updates it ( the
relative number after the dataset is unallocated )
As from what I remember in multi step job
Where the GDG is explicitly allocated the GDG number gets updates only after
completion of the entire job
Thanks
> On J
On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 01:02:41 -0400 Joseph Reichman
wrote:
:>I am doing a number of snapx type dumps in a started task. I would like to
:>keep each and every one in a separate dsn. It would seem keeping them in a
:>GDG would accomplish this.
:>The Documentation says that If I turn on S99GDGNT in
I am doing a number of snapx type dumps in a started task. I would like to
keep each and every one in a separate dsn. It would seem keeping them in a
GDG would accomplish this.
The Documentation says that If I turn on S99GDGNT in S99FLAG1 I could
specify the dsn as MYSDUMP.GDG(+1) and have eac