On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 23:19:13 +0200, Binyamin Dissen
wrote:
>On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 16:57:05 + "Blaicher, Christopher Y."
> wrote:
>
>:>Generally speaking, a page sized request will return a zeroed page, but
>there is no guarantee for that
y 7, 2017 4:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Clarification On Storage
I don't know when it wouldn't. I personally wrote the code to zero out a page
on its first reference after GETMAIN back in the '70s. But as has been
discussed here, if it is part of a page that is FREEMAI
I don't know when it wouldn't. I personally wrote the code to zero out a
page on its first reference after GETMAIN back in the '70s. But as has
been discussed here, if it is part of a page that is FREEMAINed and then
the same address is returned by a subsequent GETMAIN, data may likely be
On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 16:57:05 + "Blaicher, Christopher Y."
wrote:
:>Generally speaking, a page sized request will return a zeroed page, but there
is no guarantee for that unless you specify that on the GETMAIN.
What is the case where it would not return a zeroed
2 Blue Hill Plaza #1563, Pearl River, NY 10965
>>
>> P: 201-930-8234 | M: 512-627-3803
>> E: cblaic...@syncsort.com
>>
>> www.syncsort.com
>>
>> CONNECTING BIG IRON TO BIG DATA
>>
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discu
ncsort.com
>
>www.syncsort.com
>
>CONNECTING BIG IRON TO BIG DATA
>
>-Original Message-
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
>Behalf Of Itschak Mugzach
>Sent: Saturday, January 7, 2017 11:40 AM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Itschak Mugzach
Sent: Saturday, January 7, 2017 11:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Clarification On Storage
Paul
Getmain (in private area as you described) in not a real memory frame (which is
the term for real memory
On 01/07/2017 09:07 AM, esst...@juno.com wrote:
> .
> I recently read a share presentation on system integrity by Karl Schmitz.
> Being a CICS Sysprog I dont get much opportunity to do some of the topics
> Karl discussed.
> .
> .
> I do have a question or should I say clarif
stem integrity by Karl Schmitz.
> Being a CICS Sysprog I dont get much opportunity to do some of the topics
> Karl discussed.
> .
> .
> I do have a question or should I say clarification about STORAGE.
> I also looked at the z/OS Authorized Assembler Services guide.
> .
> L
.
I recently read a share presentation on system integrity by Karl Schmitz.
Being a CICS Sysprog I dont get much opportunity to do some of the topics Karl
discussed.
.
.
I do have a question or should I say clarification about STORAGE.
I also looked at the z/OS Authorized Assembler Services guide
Regarding Common Storage SP253 or SP241
SP253 is not common storage. It is fixed task-owned private (LSQA).
STORAGE OBTAIN,LENGTH=(R0),LOC=31,BNDRY=DBLWD
STORAGE OBTAIN,LENGTH=(R0),LOC=31,BNDRY=DBLWD,SP=0
What I found puzzling about the query is why the need for
clarification?. Is there
Looking for some clarification rearding STORAGE OBTAIN.
.
.
Two Storage OBTAIN Macros
STORAGE OBTAIN,LENGTH=(R0),LOC=31,BNDRY=DBLWD
STORAGE OBTAIN,LENGTH=(R0),LOC=31,BNDRY=DBLWD,SP=0
My understanding is that If I omit the SP parameter (scenario 1), the system
uses a default subpool of 0
In
b6c1eb4364c30e47950e0f68ef65f467cc6f0...@proditmailbox1.us.syncsort.com,
on 03/22/2015
at 05:43 PM, Blaicher, Christopher Y. cblaic...@syncsort.com
said:
yes
No. Only his first statment is correct.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
13 matches
Mail list logo