Re: Clarification On Storage

2017-01-07 Thread Walt Farrell
On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 23:19:13 +0200, Binyamin Dissen wrote: >On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 16:57:05 + "Blaicher, Christopher Y." > wrote: > >:>Generally speaking, a page sized request will return a zeroed page, but >there is no guarantee for that

Re: Clarification On Storage

2017-01-07 Thread Blaicher, Christopher Y.
y 7, 2017 4:36 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Clarification On Storage I don't know when it wouldn't. I personally wrote the code to zero out a page on its first reference after GETMAIN back in the '70s. But as has been discussed here, if it is part of a page that is FREEMAI

Re: Clarification On Storage

2017-01-07 Thread Mike Myers
I don't know when it wouldn't. I personally wrote the code to zero out a page on its first reference after GETMAIN back in the '70s. But as has been discussed here, if it is part of a page that is FREEMAINed and then the same address is returned by a subsequent GETMAIN, data may likely be

Re: Clarification On Storage

2017-01-07 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 16:57:05 + "Blaicher, Christopher Y." wrote: :>Generally speaking, a page sized request will return a zeroed page, but there is no guarantee for that unless you specify that on the GETMAIN. What is the case where it would not return a zeroed

Re: Clarification On Storage

2017-01-07 Thread Itschak Mugzach
2 Blue Hill Plaza #1563, Pearl River, NY 10965 >> >> P: 201-930-8234 | M: 512-627-3803 >> E: cblaic...@syncsort.com >> >> www.syncsort.com >> >> CONNECTING BIG IRON TO BIG DATA >> >> -----Original Message- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discu

Re: Clarification On Storage

2017-01-07 Thread Clark Morris
ncsort.com > >www.syncsort.com > >CONNECTING BIG IRON TO BIG DATA > >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On >Behalf Of Itschak Mugzach >Sent: Saturday, January 7, 2017 11:40 AM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Re: Clarification On Storage

2017-01-07 Thread Blaicher, Christopher Y.
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Itschak Mugzach Sent: Saturday, January 7, 2017 11:40 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Clarification On Storage Paul Getmain (in private area as you described) in not a real memory frame (which is the term for real memory

Re: Clarification On Storage

2017-01-07 Thread Joel C. Ewing
On 01/07/2017 09:07 AM, esst...@juno.com wrote: > . > I recently read a share presentation on system integrity by Karl Schmitz. > Being a CICS Sysprog I dont get much opportunity to do some of the topics > Karl discussed. > . > . > I do have a question or should I say clarif

Re: Clarification On Storage

2017-01-07 Thread Itschak Mugzach
stem integrity by Karl Schmitz. > Being a CICS Sysprog I dont get much opportunity to do some of the topics > Karl discussed. > . > . > I do have a question or should I say clarification about STORAGE. > I also looked at the z/OS Authorized Assembler Services guide. > . > L

Clarification On Storage

2017-01-07 Thread esst...@juno.com
. I recently read a share presentation on system integrity by Karl Schmitz. Being a CICS Sysprog I dont get much opportunity to do some of the topics Karl discussed. . . I do have a question or should I say clarification about STORAGE. I also looked at the z/OS Authorized Assembler Services guide

Re: Clarification Of STORAGE OBTAIN Parameters

2015-03-23 Thread Peter Relson
Regarding Common Storage SP253 or SP241 SP253 is not common storage. It is fixed task-owned private (LSQA). STORAGE OBTAIN,LENGTH=(R0),LOC=31,BNDRY=DBLWD STORAGE OBTAIN,LENGTH=(R0),LOC=31,BNDRY=DBLWD,SP=0 What I found puzzling about the query is why the need for clarification?. Is there

Clarification Of STORAGE OBTAIN Parameters

2015-03-22 Thread esst...@juno.com
Looking for some clarification rearding STORAGE OBTAIN. . . Two Storage OBTAIN Macros STORAGE OBTAIN,LENGTH=(R0),LOC=31,BNDRY=DBLWD STORAGE OBTAIN,LENGTH=(R0),LOC=31,BNDRY=DBLWD,SP=0 My understanding is that If I omit the SP parameter (scenario 1), the system uses a default subpool of 0

Re: Clarification Of STORAGE OBTAIN Parameters

2015-03-22 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In b6c1eb4364c30e47950e0f68ef65f467cc6f0...@proditmailbox1.us.syncsort.com, on 03/22/2015 at 05:43 PM, Blaicher, Christopher Y. cblaic...@syncsort.com said: yes No. Only his first statment is correct. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see