In 1372711817.27664.yahoomail...@web126205.mail.ne1.yahoo.com, on
07/01/2013
at 01:50 PM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com said:
Actually RXQUEUE on ooREXX works great on Windoze and Linux
It works fine on OS/2 as well, but the ANSI mechanism is cleaner.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz,
In
985915eee6984740ae93f8495c624c6c23199bd...@jscpcwexmaa1.bsg.ad.adp.com,
on 07/01/2013
at 05:23 PM, Farley, Peter x23353 peter.far...@broadridge.com
said:
OK, I can see that as a reason. Personally I would prefer an
explicit test in the code to a remotely-specified out-of-code-body
jump,
David,
Seems awful slow box you are on. Is this a z Box?
Why have a DO UNTIL when EXECIO 5000 DISKR INPUT ( STEM REC. FINIS
is all that's needed?
Your REXX code was 1-2 elapsed seconds on my box.
No need for the second EXECIO
Cowlishaw BENCH:
- REXXCPS 2.1 -- MEASURING REXX
David,
My bad, you must have a huge file here, reading 5000 at a time. Hmm, slow as...
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:51 PM, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/07/2013 1:25 AM, Thomas Conley wrote:
On 6/30/2013 12:17 PM, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J. wrote:
In
On 1/07/2013 2:38 PM, Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
David,
My bad, you must have a huge file here, reading 5000 at a time. Hmm, slow as...
No worries Wayne. You always were a tad trigger happy m8 ;) FWIW, we
have a shiny new z114 with 3 engines (1 zIIP). Storage
is a FICON attached IBM SAN. A
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 15:44:49 +0930, Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
Why have a DO UNTIL when EXECIO 5000 DISKR INPUT ( STEM REC. FINIS
is all that's needed?
Perhaps because outside a test case he's unable to anticipate the
size of his data set?
-- gil
In 2972359222388556.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
06/30/2013
at 09:50 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
What are the enhancements in the ANSI standard?
Among other things, stream I/O, enhancements to address.
Oddly enough, z/OS supports stream I/O in the Unix shell
It's an old REXX performance hack to mitigate the call/parsing call
overhead of EXECIO to scale better for large data sets.
You have to tune the number of reads because the overhead of storage
allocation in REXX may be the bottleneck. There's a sweet spot.
On 1/07/2013 9:12 PM, Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 09:25:37 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In 2972359222388556.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
06/30/2013
at 09:50 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
What are the enhancements in the ANSI standard?
Among other things, stream I/O, enhancements to
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: EXECIO - Was: Great quote on http://slashdot.org (changes
frequently)
On 29/06/2013 6:39 PM, Martin Packer wrote:
As EXECIO got mentioned...
In the Munich System z Technical University conference 2 weeks ago Marna
Walle mentioned that in z/OS 2.1 EXECIO is previewed
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 9:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: EXECIO - Was: Great quote on http://slashdot.org (changes
frequently)
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 09:25:37 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In 2972359222388556.wa.paulgboulderaim
In 5926894443011344.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
07/01/2013
at 08:48 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
Which enhancements to address?
E.g., trapping the output without an add-in like RXQUEUE.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2
: EXECIO - Was: Great quote on http://slashdot.org (changes
frequently)
In 5926894443011344.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
07/01/2013
at 08:48 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
Which enhancements to address?
E.g., trapping the output without an add-in like RXQUEUE
In
985915eee6984740ae93f8495c624c6c2319906...@jscpcwexmaa1.bsg.ad.adp.com,
on 07/01/2013
at 12:34 PM, Farley, Peter x23353 peter.far...@broadridge.com
said:
Implementation of standards is only useful if the feature is really
needed. I can't think of a reason for needing NOTREADY with classic
] On Behalf
Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 5:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: EXECIO - Was: Great quote on http://slashdot.org (changes
frequently)
In
985915eee6984740ae93f8495c624c6c2319906...@jscpcwexmaa1.bsg.ad.adp.com,
on 07/01/2013
at 12:34 PM, Farley
On 30/06/2013 2:03 PM, Ed Jaffe wrote:
On 6/29/2013 9:38 PM, David Crayford wrote:
It's good that they accepted the requirement. Reading between the
lines they're saying We think it's a good requirement. We want to do
it, but we probably won't. At least not anytime soon.
I have been looking
On 6/29/2013 11:17 PM, David Crayford wrote:
Thanks. Maybe I was confused by the last sentence This is not a
commitment to deliver the code, but if we do it it would be a line
item and would take a few years before it can be delivered.
A line item means it would show up only on a release
On 30/06/2013 2:25 PM, Ed Jaffe wrote:
On 6/29/2013 11:17 PM, David Crayford wrote:
Thanks. Maybe I was confused by the last sentence This is not a
commitment to deliver the code, but if we do it it would be a line
item and would take a few years before it can be delivered.
A line item
Ed,
I am reading through this thread and i am confused . What did the IBM
announcement say about z/OS EXECIO ? I see they are talking about VBS ..was tat
the total announcement or did I miss something ?
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
In
of28a24a26.61fdf4d9-on80257b99.0039d7d3-80257b99.003a9...@uk.ibm.com,
on 06/29/2013
at 11:39 AM, Martin Packer martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com said:
In the Munich System z Technical University conference 2 weeks ago
Marna Walle mentioned that in z/OS 2.1 EXECIO is previewed to
perform I/O to VBS
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: EXECIO - Was: Great quote on http://slashdot.org (changes
frequently)
Ed,
I am reading through this thread and i am confused . What did the IBM
announcement say about z/OS EXECIO ? I see they are talking about VBS ..was
tat the total announcement or did I miss something
quote on http://slashdot.org (changes
frequently)
Ed,
I am reading through this thread and i am confused . What did the IBM
announcement say about z/OS EXECIO ? I see they are talking about VBS ..was
tat the total announcement or did I miss something ?
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
? EXECIO isn't part of Rexx...
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+...@patriot.net wrote:
In
of28a24a26.61fdf4d9-on80257b99.0039d7d3-80257b99.003a9...@uk.ibm.com,
on 06/29/2013
at 11:39 AM, Martin Packer martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com said:
In the Munich System
On 6/30/2013 12:17 PM, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J. wrote:
In
of28a24a26.61fdf4d9-on80257b99.0039d7d3-80257b99.003a9...@uk.ibm.com,
on 06/29/2013
at 11:39 AM, Martin Packer martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com said:
In the Munich System z Technical University conference 2 weeks ago
Marna Walle mentioned
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 8:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: EXECIO - Was: Great quote on http://slashdot.org (changes
frequently)
On 29/06/2013 6:39 PM, Martin Packer wrote:
As EXECIO got mentioned...
In the Munich System z Technical University conference 2 weeks ago Marna
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 09:25:03 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
Have they added the language enhancements in OOREXX, or at least those
in the ANSI standard?
What are the enhancements in the ANSI standard?
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 11:16:21 -0400, Scott Ford wrote:
I am reading through this
It's hard to extend REXX. I wrote a regular expression package that
wraps the C++ TR1 regex engine that came along in z/OS V1.10. The REXX
interface is pretty much written for assembler clients. It would be more
useful
if it handled LE like ISPF now does in BRIF/EDIF etc. I had to write a
On 1/07/2013 1:25 AM, Thomas Conley wrote:
On 6/30/2013 12:17 PM, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J. wrote:
In
of28a24a26.61fdf4d9-on80257b99.0039d7d3-80257b99.003a9...@uk.ibm.com,
on 06/29/2013
at 11:39 AM, Martin Packer martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com said:
In the Munich System z Technical University
As EXECIO got mentioned...
In the Munich System z Technical University conference 2 weeks ago Marna
Walle mentioned that in z/OS 2.1 EXECIO is previewed to perform I/O to VBS
(as in Spanned :-) ) data sets.
To me that says SMF. And removes one lameness in EXECIO.
It would be nice to
On 29/06/2013 6:39 PM, Martin Packer wrote:
As EXECIO got mentioned...
In the Munich System z Technical University conference 2 weeks ago Marna
Walle mentioned that in z/OS 2.1 EXECIO is previewed to perform I/O to VBS
(as in Spanned :-) ) data sets.
To me that says SMF. And removes one
On 29/06/2013 11:15 PM, Ed Jaffe wrote:
On 6/29/2013 5:16 AM, David Crayford wrote:
On 29/06/2013 6:39 PM, Martin Packer wrote:
As EXECIO got mentioned...
In the Munich System z Technical University conference 2 weeks ago
Marna
Walle mentioned that in z/OS 2.1 EXECIO is previewed to perform
31 matches
Mail list logo
