Re: [External] Getting a VOLSER for a disk that is a member of a copy pair

2018-04-05 Thread Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM
> I somewhat lean toward "NOT ONLINE" over OFFLINE for those PENDING > states. Pending offline volumes are still online. So NOT ONLINE *is* OFFLINE. Kees. > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Steve Horein > Sent: 05

Re: [External] Getting a VOLSER for a disk that is a member of a copy pair

2018-04-05 Thread Steve Horein
It seems context is a player in the semantics portion of the topic. The request is for the type of LIST. 1) You can create a list of volumes that are ONLINE. 2) You can create a list of volumes that are NOT ONLINE/OFFLINE. 3.a) You can create a list of volumes that are either ONLINE or NOT

Re: [External] Getting a VOLSER for a disk that is a member of a copy pair

2018-04-05 Thread Brian Fraser
Am I 1) at home 2) at the office 3) either 4) both "both" would suggest that my home is my office. Oh wait it is :) But yes, I agree with Rex On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 6:01 AM, Bill Wilkie wrote: > The doc says online, offline and both earlier in the doc. > > Sent

Re: [External] Getting a VOLSER for a disk that is a member of a copy pair

2018-04-04 Thread Bill Wilkie
The doc says online, offline and both earlier in the doc. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 4, 2018, at 3:42 PM, Pommier, Rex wrote: > > Actually I think an English major would disagree with your documentation > assessment. 3-Either means if it is either online or

Re: [External] Getting a VOLSER for a disk that is a member of a copy pair

2018-04-04 Thread Pommier, Rex
Actually I think an English major would disagree with your documentation assessment. 3-Either means if it is either online or offline, add it to the list, 3-Both says it has to be both online and offline to get included. :-) Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Getting a VOLSER for a disk that is a member of a copy pair

2018-04-04 Thread Bill Wilkie
I have a program that reads VOLSERS for offline volumes. It works fine for several flavors of VM and Z/OS, and returns the data in a few MS. But takes a minute when issued to a device in a copy pair. If I issue it a second time, it runs fast, so I suppose it could be coming from CACHE or some