Luminex tapeless solution

2013-05-21 Thread Hervey Martinez
Hello,

We'll be testing a Luminex tapeless solution in our mainframe environment in 
the next couple of months and just wondering if any of you out there have gone 
through this type of implementation. If so, any problems encountered migrating 
the HSM or TSM tape date to this new hardware? Anything to look out for?

Regards,

Hervey
Storage Administrator


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Luminex tapeless solution

2013-05-21 Thread Lizette Koehler
Hervey,

Please post your observations.  We are currently looking at various tape
solutions for Mainframe and I will be interested to see how Luminex works
for you.

Lizette

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Hervey Martinez
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 7:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Luminex tapeless solution

Hello,

We'll be testing a Luminex tapeless solution in our mainframe environment in
the next couple of months and just wondering if any of you out there have
gone through this type of implementation. If so, any problems encountered
migrating the HSM or TSM tape date to this new hardware? Anything to look
out for?

Regards,

Hervey
Storage Administrator

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Luminex tapeless solution

2013-05-21 Thread Darth Keller
I would think HSM would have the same issues regardless of the virtual 
tape system used.  We have an MDL - 

As I remember, we set up a new esoteric to use with the MDL.  So UNITNAME 
had to be changed.

We used a tape size of 40GB's for the MDL. 

We changed RECYCLEPERCENT(5).  So as not to recycle backup tapes too 
frequently.   We didn't want to spend too much CPU here and have plenty of 
room in the MDL.

Also PERCENTFULL(2)  for ML2 tape - we use Rocket Software (OpenTech) 
TapeCopy/VDR for disaster recovery.  At DR we have an IBM library, The 
limit for tape size is 4GB's.  So we ran into issues when trying to 
restore larger ML2 tapes at DR  found it easier to limit the amount of an 
ML2 tape used at home.   We do not limit the size of Backup tapes as they 
don't go to DR.

ML2RECYCLEPERCENT(10)-  we're going to have to check on this one.  I'm 
not sure at this point how this fits with our PERCENTFULL(2).   Think's 
it's 10% valid data from the amount actually written to that tape.

We don't use ABARS or HSM dumps.  It seems likely that if you do, you'll 
have parms to at least look at if not change.

This is from just a quick scan of our HSM parms.  More than likely I've 
missed something.  Hopefully I won't get crucified for it.

ddk








Hervey,

Please post your observations.  We are currently looking at various tape
solutions for Mainframe and I will be interested to see how Luminex works
for you.

Lizette

-Original Message-


Hello,

We'll be testing a Luminex tapeless solution in our mainframe environment 
in
the next couple of months and just wondering if any of you out there have
gone through this type of implementation. If so, any problems encountered
migrating the HSM or TSM tape date to this new hardware? Anything to look
out for?

Regards,

Hervey
Storage Administrator

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may
contain legally privileged and/or confidential information intended
solely for the use of the addressee(s). If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, forwarding or
other use of this message or its attachments is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately and delete this message and all
copies and backups thereof. Thank you.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Luminex tapeless solution

2013-05-21 Thread David Andrews
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 07:14 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
 Please post your observations [...] Luminex

We didn't buy anybody's solution, but seriously flirted with Luminex
last year.  Art Tolsma was generous with his time at SHARE, which made
me interested to begin with, and Dave Tolsma was open and accommodating.
Every call to them was a pleasure.

Atop a DataDomain backend, there appears to be some serious black magic
going on.  We're a FDR customer, and Tom Meehan (IDP) has presented some
impressive deduplication experience at SHARE.  EMC told me at the time
that there are over 20 sets of dataset markers that a DD backend
recognizes, enabling it to take special action to deduplicate e.g. FDR
backups.

-- 
David Andrews
A. Duda  Sons, Inc.
david.andr...@duda.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Luminex tapeless solution

2013-05-21 Thread Doug Fuerst
I did a Luminex implementation. .Contact me off list if you want some
information on it. 

Doug


Doug Fuerst
Principal Consultant
BK Associates
718.921.2620
917.572.7364
d...@bkassociates.net

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 10:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Luminex tapeless solution

Hervey,

Please post your observations.  We are currently looking at various tape
solutions for Mainframe and I will be interested to see how Luminex works
for you.

Lizette

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Hervey Martinez
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 7:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Luminex tapeless solution

Hello,

We'll be testing a Luminex tapeless solution in our mainframe environment in
the next couple of months and just wondering if any of you out there have
gone through this type of implementation. If so, any problems encountered
migrating the HSM or TSM tape date to this new hardware? Anything to look
out for?

Regards,

Hervey
Storage Administrator

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN