Re: Merging two CTN STP

2017-03-17 Thread Mohamed Juma
Thank for all who gave guide, I learned new things Mohamed Sent from my iPad > On Mar 17, 2017, at 2:58 PM, Dana Mitchell wrote: > > Nick, > That's an excellent document, I had not seen that before. Saved for future > reference. > > Thanks, > Dana > >> On Fri, 17 Mar

Re: Merging two CTN STP

2017-03-17 Thread Mohamed Juma
Thanks a lot Nick, it is very useful Doc Mohamed Sent from my iPad > On Mar 17, 2017, at 12:22 PM, Nick G wrote: > > Take a look at white paper WP102314 at http://www.ibm.com/support/techdocs > > This gives you various options of merging CTNs either disruptively or >

Re: Merging two CTN STP

2017-03-17 Thread Dana Mitchell
Nick, That's an excellent document, I had not seen that before. Saved for future reference. Thanks, Dana On Fri, 17 Mar 2017 04:22:56 -0500, Nick G wrote: >Take a look at white paper WP102314 at http://www.ibm.com/support/techdocs >

Re: Merging two CTN STP

2017-03-17 Thread R.S.
W dniu 2017-03-17 o 07:36, Mohamed Gomaa pisze: It locks that, I did not ask the question properly. What I want to see do I have to stop in previous all the LPARs getting the time from this CTN, because I feel if any LPAR see that the CTN name changed it may have some corruption To clarify:

Re: Merging two CTN STP

2017-03-17 Thread Nick G
Take a look at white paper WP102314 at http://www.ibm.com/support/techdocs This gives you various options of merging CTNs either disruptively or non-disruptively, I successfully used the non-disruptive approach last year having studied this paper very carefully.

Re: Merging two CTN STP

2017-03-17 Thread Mohamed Gomaa
It locks that, I did not ask the question properly. What I want to see do I have to stop in previous all the LPARs getting the time from this CTN, because I feel if any LPAR see that the CTN name changed it may have some corruption Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 16, 2017, at 8:49 PM, Dana

Re: Merging two CTN STP

2017-03-16 Thread Dana Mitchell
You shouldn't have to stop them (the CEC's themselves) as long as you can get all the timing links active first. Any LPARs that want to join the sysplexes will need re-ipled if the timesource changes. On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 20:45:30 +0300, Mohamed Gomaa wrote: >Hi Dana, >Do I

Re: Merging two CTN STP

2017-03-16 Thread Mohamed Gomaa
Hi Dana, Do I have to stop the two CECs first before do the change. Mohamed Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 16, 2017, at 8:00 PM, Dana Mitchell wrote: > > Mohamed, > > You will have to change the CTN on the DR CEC and the TEST CEC to PRODSTP. > Then I think all LPARs on

Re: Merging two CTN STP

2017-03-16 Thread Dana Mitchell
Mohamed, You will have to change the CTN on the DR CEC and the TEST CEC to PRODSTP. Then I think all LPARs on those two CECs will need to be IPLed to be aware of the new time source. It's been a while since we've change any of our STP configuration. Dana On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:20:07 +,

Merging two CTN STP

2017-03-16 Thread Mohamed Juma
 Hi dear We are right now in project of Disaster Recovery Site, we have only one CEC in DR to combined both TEST and PROD, in HO three CECs for PROD, and one CEC for TEST.The PROD in one CTN STP called (PRODSTP)  the TEST environment in Active/Active between the two sites in one Sysplex

Merging Two CTN STP

2017-03-16 Thread Mohamed Juma
  Hi dear We are rightnow in project of Disaster Recovery Site, we have only one CEC in DR tocombined both TEST and PROD, in HO three CECs for PROD, and one CEC forTEST.The PROD in one CTN STP called (PRODSTP)  the TEST environmentin Active/Active between the two sites in one Sysplex using one