-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Saturday, April 3, 2021 8:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] Re: No file permissions or super user authority for
executing a shell script
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 13:26:07
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 13:26:07 +, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>
>I'm asking this from a "I don't know" standpoint because I've never used them.
> Doesn't RACF have extended ACLs that could possibly come into play here? As
>in using RACF to grant read or execute authority to the script? If so, how
W dniu 02.04.2021 o 15:26, Pommier, Rex pisze:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Radoslaw Skorupka
Sent: Friday, April 2, 2021 5:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: No file permissions or super user authority for
executing a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Radoslaw Skorupka
Sent: Friday, April 2, 2021 5:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: No file permissions or super user authority for
executing a shell script
W dniu 01.04.2021 o 22:01, Robert
W dniu 01.04.2021 o 22:01, Robert Hahne pisze:
Greetings ,
Is there a way a user can be allowed to execute a unix shell script in batch
without changing the file permission bits or granting SUPERUSER authority ?
Currently the file has got 700 and the user is not the owner of the file . Any
The simple answer is NO.
Lou
--
Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity
- Unknown
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 3:01 PM Robert Hahne
wrote:
> Greetings ,
>
> Is there a way a user can be allowed to execute a unix shell script in
> batch without changing the file permission bits
Greetings ,
Is there a way a user can be allowed to execute a unix shell script in batch
without changing the file permission bits or granting SUPERUSER authority ?
Currently the file has got 700 and the user is not the owner of the file . Any
suggestions would be great
Regards,
Robert Hahne
