Re: OT: Federalism and speed limits

2020-08-09 Thread Stefan Skoglund
ons 2020-08-05 klockan 12:04 -0400 skrev scott Ford: > Bob, > > We drove 130kph + in Switzerland and France when I lived there. > Everyone > was like a low flying jet, but safe, very few accidents. > 130 kph in Switzerland - that is overspeeding, they have a generic max of 120 for motorways

Re: OT: Federalism and speed limits

2020-08-06 Thread R.S.
W dniu 05.08.2020 o 17:58, Bob Bridges pisze: Radoslaw, it seems to me two things are going on here. One is simply a mistake of fact: Speed limits are ~not~ a good candidate for standardization. An upper limit of 120mph would be possible in Texas but insane in North Carolina. You said

Re: OT: Federalism and speed limits

2020-08-05 Thread scott Ford
Bob, We drove 130kph + in Switzerland and France when I lived there. Everyone was like a low flying jet, but safe, very few accidents. On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 11:58 AM Bob Bridges wrote: > Radoslaw, it seems to me two things are going on here. One is simply a > mistake of fact: Speed limits

Re: OT: Federalism and speed limits

2020-08-05 Thread Bob Bridges
Radoslaw, it seems to me two things are going on here. One is simply a mistake of fact: Speed limits are ~not~ a good candidate for standardization. An upper limit of 120mph would be possible in Texas but insane in North Carolina. You said pretty much the same thing in your original post:

Re: OT: Federalism and speed limits

2020-08-05 Thread Bob Bridges
Nah, not that confusing. Roads mostly have speed limits posted on the roads themselves - I mean, there are signs along the road saying 35mph or 55mph or whatever - and after you've driven in the US long enough mostly the limits are easy enough to guess based on conditions; I can usually tell