Re: Reader Comment on SA22-7832-08 (PoPS), should I?

2013-06-28 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In caajsdji8sruxatn6ccrjjbyvh1epzzrakjyeeyjermpdsbf...@mail.gmail.com, on 06/27/2013 at 10:48 AM, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com said: I am wondering if anybody else has the same problem that I have with how the Principles of Operation, in PDF format, is laid out. Basically, in

Re: Reader Comment on SA22-7832-08 (PoPS), should I?

2013-06-28 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
Not everyone. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 6:43 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Reader Comment on SA22-7832-08 (PoPS), should I

Re: Reader Comment on SA22-7832-08 (PoPS), should I?

2013-06-28 Thread John McKown
My bad. I should have said landscape, not portrait. It has been a very bad week. Lack of sleep due to a sick dog. On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote: In caajsdji8sruxatn6ccrjjbyvh1epzzrakjyeeyjermpdsbf...@mail.gmail.com, on 06/27/2013

Re: Reader Comment on SA22-7832-08 (PoPS), should I?

2013-06-28 Thread Don Williams
Subject: Re: Reader Comment on SA22-7832-08 (PoPS), should I? In caajsdji8sruxatn6ccrjjbyvh1epzzrakjyeeyjermpdsbf...@mail.gmail.com , on 06/27/2013 at 10:48 AM, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com said: I am wondering if anybody else has the same problem that I have with how

Re: Reader Comment on SA22-7832-08 (PoPS), should I?

2013-06-28 Thread Charles Mills
] On Behalf Of John McKown Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 8:49 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Reader Comment on SA22-7832-08 (PoPS), should I? I am wondering if anybody else has the same problem that I have with how the Principles of Operation, in PDF format, is laid out. Basically

Re: Reader Comment on SA22-7832-08 (PoPS), should I?

2013-06-28 Thread Anne Lynn Wheeler
charl...@mcn.org (Charles Mills) writes: I could picture a very 21st century, electronic PoP that presented an index to the detailed descriptions in the form of a table that could be sorted on name, on mnemonic, on hex opcode, etc. triva ... PoPs was one of first major IBM pub to move to CMS

Reader Comment on SA22-7832-08 (PoPS), should I?

2013-06-27 Thread John McKown
I am wondering if anybody else has the same problem that I have with how the Principles of Operation, in PDF format, is laid out. Basically, in today's electronic world, why is this publication still formatted in two columns? On my normal PC, in portrait mode, I must either view an entire page at

Re: Reader Comment on SA22-7832-08 (PoPS), should I?

2013-06-27 Thread Mike Bell
many of the redbooks now supply epub format - And yes, I still miss bookmanager. Mike On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.comwrote: On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:48:57 -0500, John McKown wrote: why is this publication [Principles of Operation] still formatted in two

Re: Reader Comment on SA22-7832-08 (PoPS), should I?

2013-06-27 Thread Tom Marchant
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:48:57 -0500, John McKown wrote: why is this publication [Principles of Operation] still formatted in two columns? I find that annoying too. -- Tom Marchant -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive

Re: Reader Comment on SA22-7832-08 (PoPS), should I?

2013-06-27 Thread Tony Harminc
On 27 June 2013 11:48, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com wrote: Would it be worth while to tell IBM that the document would be much more readable if it were like the other manuals; having only one column of text, except perhaps for tables? I have had nothing but good results from my

Re: Reader Comment on SA22-7832-08 (PoPS), should I?

2013-06-27 Thread Skip Robinson
Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 626-302-7535 Office 323-715-0595 Mobile jo.skip.robin...@sce.com From: Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU, Date: 06/27/2013 09:53 AM Subject:Re: Reader Comment on SA22-7832-08 (PoPS), should I? Sent

Re: Reader Comment on SA22-7832-08 (PoPS), should I?

2013-06-27 Thread John McKown
...@harminc.net To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU, Date: 06/27/2013 09:53 AM Subject:Re: Reader Comment on SA22-7832-08 (PoPS), should I? Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On 27 June 2013 11:48, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com wrote: Would

Re: Reader Comment on SA22-7832-08 (PoPS), should I?

2013-06-27 Thread Don Williams
12:13 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Reader Comment on SA22-7832-08 (PoPS), should I? On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:48:57 -0500, John McKown wrote: why is this publication [Principles of Operation] still formatted in two columns? I find that annoying too. -- Tom Marchant