Re: Real Storage Allocation

2016-02-16 Thread phil yogendran
on, > interception, tampering, amendment or viruses or any consequence thereof. > > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Ed Jaffe > Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2016 5:05 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.E

Re: Real Storage Allocation

2016-02-15 Thread John Abell
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Real Storage Allocation On 2/14/2016 11:19 AM, Graham Harris wrote: > Ed Jaffe wrote: > > >> The nice thing about an overabundance of real storage is the ability >> to > create a very large LFAREA with plenty of room for 1MB >pageable p

Re: Real Storage Allocation

2016-02-14 Thread Ed Jaffe
On 2/14/2016 11:19 AM, Graham Harris wrote: Ed Jaffe wrote: The nice thing about an overabundance of real storage is the ability to create a very large LFAREA with plenty of room for 1MB >pageable pages and -- if you have software that can truly benefit from it (which we don't) -- 2G fixed

Re: Real Storage Allocation

2016-02-14 Thread Graham Harris
/ Facebook IDs: MartinPacker > Blog: > https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker > > > > From: "Rugen, Len" <rug...@missouri.edu> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Date: 12/02/2016 22:40 > Subject:Re: Real Sto

Re: Real Storage Allocation

2016-02-13 Thread Martin Packer
IDs: MartinPacker Blog: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker From: "Rugen, Len" <rug...@missouri.edu> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Date: 12/02/2016 22:40 Subject: Re: Real Storage Allocation Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discu

Real Storage Allocation

2016-02-12 Thread phil yogendran
Hello, Is there a downside to over-allocating real storage on an LPAR? We will be upgrading current processors which are tired and soon to be out of service to z13's which will have 4 times the storage we have at present. We don't have any issues with paging or UIC etc. but I feel that on the

Re: Real Storage Allocation

2016-02-12 Thread Rugen, Len
Subject: Real Storage Allocation Hello, Is there a downside to over-allocating real storage on an LPAR? We will be upgrading current processors which are tired and soon to be out of service to z13's which will have 4 times the storage we have at present. We don't have any issues with paging or

Re: Real Storage Allocation

2016-02-12 Thread Jim Mulder
> > Is there a downside to over-allocating real storage on an LPAR? > > Slower stand-alone dump? Seriously, that's the only "downside" I know > of, but I'm not really a performance guy... And larger stand-alone dumps. So remember to review the sizes of your stand-alone dump output data

Re: Real Storage Allocation

2016-02-12 Thread Ed Jaffe
On 2/12/2016 2:07 PM, phil yogendran wrote: Hello, Is there a downside to over-allocating real storage on an LPAR? Slower stand-alone dump? Seriously, that's the only "downside" I know of, but I'm not really a performance guy... We will be upgrading current processors which are tired and