Re: Reliable source for OCO?

of Timothy Sipples [sipp...@sg.ibm.com] Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2022 11:38 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Reliable source for OCO? Shmuel Metz wrote: >I'm editing the wikipedia [[Operating system]] article, and another editor >has challenged the sentence "The lo

Re: Reliable source for OCO?

Shmuel Metz wrote: >I'm editing the wikipedia [[Operating system]] article, and another editor >has challenged the sentence "The logic manuals for their contemporary >descendants, >z/VM, z/VSE and z/VM, are not available to the general public." Is that editor actually challenging you on

Re: Reliable source for OCO?

List on behalf of Alan Altmark Sent: Friday, April 15, 2022 11:14 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Reliable source for OCO? On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 11:37:32 +, Seymour J Metz wrote: >I'm editing the wikipedia [[Operating system]] article, and another editor has >chal

Re: Reliable source for OCO?

On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 at 12:16, g...@gabegold.com wrote: > > I'm still here, though not posting much these days. Hi Gabe! >I pulled out my source file -- about 1 1/2 inches thick, including SHARE SSD >(SHARE Secretary's Distribution, as opposed to solid state device!) #349 from >August 1986,

Re: Reliable source for OCO?

I'm still here, though not posting much these days. I pulled out my source file -- about 1 1/2 inches thick, including SHARE SSD (SHARE Secretary's Distribution, as opposed to solid state device!) #349 from August 1986, and SHARE 64 Session #0042, "All Your Fears are Sourceless" (report of the

Re: Reliable source for OCO?

I can’t recall a policy other than a shift to Object Code Only where the internals became opaque Matt Hogstrom m...@hogstrom.org +1-919-656-0564 PGP Key: 0x90ECB270 Facebook LinkedIn Twitter

Re: Reliable source for OCO?

On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 11:37:32 +, Seymour J Metz wrote: >I'm editing the wikipedia [[Operating system]] article, and another editor has >challenged the sentence "The logic manuals for their >contemporary descendants, z/VM, z/VSE and z/VM, are not available to the >general public." What are

Re: Reliable source for OCO?

Subject: Re: Reliable source for OCO? On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 07:37, Seymour J Metz wrote: > I'm editing the wikipedia [[Operating system]] article, and another editor > has challenged the sentence "The logic manuals for their contemporary > descendants, z/VM, z/VSE and z/VM, are

Re: Reliable source for OCO?

From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Tony Thigpen [t...@vse2pdf.com] Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2022 11:42 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Reliable source for OCO? Seymour, He is asking you to prove a negative. Call him

Re: Reliable source for OCO?

Seymour, He is asking you to prove a negative. Call him on it. Tony Thigpen Seymour J Metz wrote on 4/14/22 07:37: I'm editing the wikipedia [[Operating system]] article, and another editor has challenged the sentence "The logic manuals for their contemporary descendants, z/VM, z/VSE and

Re: Reliable source for OCO?

On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 07:37, Seymour J Metz wrote: > I'm editing the wikipedia [[Operating system]] article, and another editor > has challenged the sentence "The logic manuals for their contemporary > descendants, z/VM, z/VSE and z/VM, are not available to the general public." > What are the

Reliable source for OCO?

I'm editing the wikipedia [[Operating system]] article, and another editor has challenged the sentence "The logic manuals for their contemporary descendants, z/VM, z/VSE and z/VM, are not available to the general public." What are the relevant URLs for IBM's policy? Thanks. -- Shmuel