Re: SMF record for number of program executions?

2023-11-09 Thread kekronbekron
Nice one Rob!
Good to see MFM (or a rebirth of it) makes its way to SDSF.



On Friday, November 10th, 2023 at 04:09, Rob Scott  
wrote:


> As others have pointed out, monitoring the "fetch" of a load module is very 
> doable, whereas monitoring any subsequent usage of the executable is much 
> more difficult.
> 
> In z/OS 3.1, SDSF introduced the "module fetch monitor" feature that was 
> inspired by the previous Poughkeepsie tool "MFM". We sit on the CSVFETCH and 
> CSVLLIX1 dynamic exits to capture both program fetch and VLF fetch events (no 
> need to front-end SVCs).
> 
> This capability might provide some insight into what you require, however it 
> cannot tell the whole story.
> 
> Rob Scott
> Rocket Software
> 
> 
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU on behalf of 
> Steve Thompson ste...@wkyr.net
> 
> Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2023 10:15:12 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> 
> Subject: Re: SMF record for number of program executions?
> 
> EXTERNAL EMAIL
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> If you are willing to write an exit to get the info, you can get
> it via a CSV exit (I forget its name, but ALL "LOAD"s go through
> it). Understand, if you use that exit, it has to have a very
> short code path, can't cause a wait of any kind, or you will
> cause problems for all address spaces in that LPAR. The idea is
> to capture the DSN & member and immediately write it to an SMF
> buffer or similar so you can immediately return control.
> 
> But other than what others have said, there is no other way to
> see all dynamically loaded subroutines or load-modules. You will
> not capture static routines as the LNKEDT doesn't use that
> interface.
> 
> I believe that IBM Products make use of that or another
> undocumented path through VLF that is handling LLA and a bit of
> caching of modules.
> 
> Regards,
> Steve Thompson
> 
> 
> 
> On 11/9/2023 4:56 PM, Glenn Miller wrote:
> 
> > Hi Linda,
> > When I have been requested to provide that information, I have used the IBM 
> > Z Software Asset Management ( aka iZSAM ) software product, which was 
> > previously known as IBM Tivoli Asset Discovery for z/OS ( aka TADz ).
> > 
> > Glenn Miller
> > 
> > --
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> 
> 
> Rocket Software, Inc. and subsidiaries ? 77 Fourth Avenue, Waltham MA 02451 ? 
> Main Office Toll Free Number: +1 855.577.4323
> Contact Customer Support: 
> https://my.rocketsoftware.com/RocketCommunity/RCEmailSupport
> Unsubscribe from Marketing Messages/Manage Your Subscription Preferences - 
> http://www.rocketsoftware.com/manage-your-email-preferences
> Privacy Policy - http://www.rocketsoftware.com/company/legal/privacy-policy
> 
> 
> This communication and any attachments may contain confidential information 
> of Rocket Software, Inc. All unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is 
> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Rocket 
> Software immediately and destroy all copies of this communication. Thank you.
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMF record for number of program executions?

2023-11-09 Thread Steve Beaver
SMF 30’s

Sent from my iPhone

No one said I could type with one thumb 

> On Nov 9, 2023, at 18:34, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw 
> <032fff1be9b4-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> 
> I believe the capability of understanding and counting program LOADs is in 
> the latest version of SDSF for z/OS 3.1. (I hope Rob Scott will correct this 
> if I am wrong).
> However, I do not think this necessarily answers the question posed. That 
> question related to the number of times a program is executed, rather than 
> the number of times it is LOADed, LINKed to or even ATTACHed. A program can 
> be loaded (using a LOAD SVC) and then executed multiple times. That execution 
> can be via a LINK SVC but could just as easily be via a CALL, which is 
> effectively a BASR or BALR, a machine instruction which does not offer the 
> level of traceability that the LOAD, LINK and ATTACH services offer. As such 
> a load module monitor such as that in SDSF will not address the issue.
> If the load module is marked not reusable and not reentrant, then I think it 
> is unlikely to be reused after a first execution. I would expect it to be 
> DELETEd and then re-LOADed. I don't think normal processing of the module 
> using language environment will allow reuse.
> If that is the case, then the question might be able to be answered for a 
> specific module that is neither reentrant nor reusable.
> Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
> https://rsclweb.com 
> ‘Dance like no one is watching. Encrypt like everyone is.’
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
> Steve Thompson
> Sent: 09 November 2023 22:15
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: SMF record for number of program executions?
> 
> If you are willing to write an exit to get the info, you can get it via a CSV 
> exit (I forget its name, but ALL "LOAD"s go through it). Understand, if you 
> use that exit, it has to have a very short code path, can't cause a wait of 
> any kind, or you will cause problems for all address spaces in that LPAR. The 
> idea is to capture the DSN & member and immediately write it to an SMF buffer 
> or similar so you can immediately return control.
> 
> But other than what others have said, there is no other way to see all 
> dynamically loaded subroutines or load-modules. You will not capture static 
> routines as the LNKEDT doesn't use that interface.
> 
> I believe that IBM Products make use of that or another undocumented path 
> through VLF that is handling LLA and a bit of caching of modules.
> 
> Regards,
> Steve Thompson
> 
> 
> 
>> On 11/9/2023 4:56 PM, Glenn Miller wrote:
>> Hi Linda,
>> When I have been requested to provide that information, I have used the IBM 
>> Z Software Asset Management ( aka iZSAM ) software product, which was 
>> previously known as IBM Tivoli Asset Discovery for z/OS ( aka TADz ).
>> 
>> Glenn Miller
>> 
>> --
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
>> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
> lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMF record for number of program executions?

2023-11-09 Thread Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
I believe the capability of understanding and counting program LOADs is in the 
latest version of SDSF for z/OS 3.1. (I hope Rob Scott will correct this if I 
am wrong).
However, I do not think this necessarily answers the question posed. That 
question related to the number of times a program is executed, rather than the 
number of times it is LOADed, LINKed to or even ATTACHed. A program can be 
loaded (using a LOAD SVC) and then executed multiple times. That execution can 
be via a LINK SVC but could just as easily be via a CALL, which is effectively 
a BASR or BALR, a machine instruction which does not offer the level of 
traceability that the LOAD, LINK and ATTACH services offer. As such a load 
module monitor such as that in SDSF will not address the issue.
If the load module is marked not reusable and not reentrant, then I think it is 
unlikely to be reused after a first execution. I would expect it to be DELETEd 
and then re-LOADed. I don't think normal processing of the module using 
language environment will allow reuse.
If that is the case, then the question might be able to be answered for a 
specific module that is neither reentrant nor reusable.
Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
https://rsclweb.com 
‘Dance like no one is watching. Encrypt like everyone is.’

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Steve Thompson
Sent: 09 November 2023 22:15
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMF record for number of program executions?

If you are willing to write an exit to get the info, you can get it via a CSV 
exit (I forget its name, but ALL "LOAD"s go through it). Understand, if you use 
that exit, it has to have a very short code path, can't cause a wait of any 
kind, or you will cause problems for all address spaces in that LPAR. The idea 
is to capture the DSN & member and immediately write it to an SMF buffer or 
similar so you can immediately return control.

But other than what others have said, there is no other way to see all 
dynamically loaded subroutines or load-modules. You will not capture static 
routines as the LNKEDT doesn't use that interface.

I believe that IBM Products make use of that or another undocumented path 
through VLF that is handling LLA and a bit of caching of modules.

Regards,
Steve Thompson



On 11/9/2023 4:56 PM, Glenn Miller wrote:
> Hi Linda,
> When I have been requested to provide that information, I have used the IBM Z 
> Software Asset Management ( aka iZSAM ) software product, which was 
> previously known as IBM Tivoli Asset Discovery for z/OS ( aka TADz ).
>
> Glenn Miller
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMF record for number of program executions?

2023-11-09 Thread Schmitt, Michael
> determining how many "times" it was used (executed) requires a tool like 
> STROBE

Unless IBM Enterprise COBOL for z/OS version 6 is making a call out to an IGZ 
module on every entry into the program, and one was able to hook such a IGZ 
module.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Michael Oujesky
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2023 5:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMF record for number of program executions?

While others have already responded about how to determine how many
times a program has been fetched into storage, determining how many
"times" it was used (executed) requires a tool like STROBE that
provides statistics on how many samples were taken while in the programs code.

Michael

At 01:00 PM 11/9/2023, L H wrote:

>Hello,
>
>I need to count the number of times some programs are executed on z/OS.
>
>Not job names or CICS Tranids, but the times Cobol object code executed.
>
>Does anyone know if a SMF record exists to record this, or does anyone have
>an Assembler program to read the SMF and produce the counts?  Or a Merrill
>example?
>
>Any assistance or reference to manuals, cbttape, etc., is appreciated.
>
>Thanks, Linda
>
>--
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMF record for number of program executions?

2023-11-09 Thread Michael Oujesky
While others have already responded about how to determine how many 
times a program has been fetched into storage, determining how many 
"times" it was used (executed) requires a tool like STROBE that 
provides statistics on how many samples were taken while in the programs code.


Michael

At 01:00 PM 11/9/2023, L H wrote:


Hello,

I need to count the number of times some programs are executed on z/OS.

Not job names or CICS Tranids, but the times Cobol object code executed.

Does anyone know if a SMF record exists to record this, or does anyone have
an Assembler program to read the SMF and produce the counts?  Or a Merrill
example?

Any assistance or reference to manuals, cbttape, etc., is appreciated.

Thanks, Linda

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMF record for number of program executions?

2023-11-09 Thread Rob Scott
As others have pointed out, monitoring the "fetch" of a load module is very 
doable, whereas monitoring any subsequent usage of the executable is much more 
difficult.

In z/OS 3.1, SDSF introduced the "module fetch monitor" feature that was 
inspired by the previous Poughkeepsie tool "MFM". We sit on the CSVFETCH and 
CSVLLIX1 dynamic exits to capture both program fetch and VLF fetch events (no 
need to front-end SVCs).

This capability might provide some insight into what you require, however it 
cannot tell the whole story.

Rob Scott
Rocket Software


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of 
Steve Thompson 
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2023 10:15:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU 
Subject: Re: SMF record for number of program executions?

EXTERNAL EMAIL





If you are willing to write an exit to get the info, you can get
it via a CSV exit (I forget its name, but ALL "LOAD"s go through
it). Understand, if you use that exit, it has to have a very
short code path, can't cause a wait of any kind, or you will
cause problems for all address spaces in that LPAR. The idea is
to capture the DSN & member and immediately write it to an SMF
buffer or similar so you can immediately return control.

But other than what others have said, there is no other way to
see all dynamically loaded subroutines or load-modules. You will
not capture static routines as the LNKEDT doesn't use that
interface.

I believe that IBM Products make use of that or another
undocumented path through VLF that is handling LLA and a bit of
caching of modules.

Regards,
Steve Thompson



On 11/9/2023 4:56 PM, Glenn Miller wrote:
> Hi Linda,
> When I have been requested to provide that information, I have used the IBM Z 
> Software Asset Management ( aka iZSAM ) software product, which was 
> previously known as IBM Tivoli Asset Discovery for z/OS ( aka TADz ).
>
> Glenn Miller
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



Rocket Software, Inc. and subsidiaries ? 77 Fourth Avenue, Waltham MA 02451 ? 
Main Office Toll Free Number: +1 855.577.4323
Contact Customer Support: 
https://my.rocketsoftware.com/RocketCommunity/RCEmailSupport
Unsubscribe from Marketing Messages/Manage Your Subscription Preferences - 
http://www.rocketsoftware.com/manage-your-email-preferences
Privacy Policy - http://www.rocketsoftware.com/company/legal/privacy-policy


This communication and any attachments may contain confidential information of 
Rocket Software, Inc. All unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is 
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Rocket 
Software immediately and destroy all copies of this communication. Thank you.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMF record for number of program executions?

2023-11-09 Thread Mario Bezzi
If the question is how many times a module was loaded, IZSAM, and several 
others can answer it. If the question is how many times that [sub]program was 
actually invoked, IZSAM and similar can't help.

As far as I know there is only one product able to do it. 

Having a vested interest I will refrain from mentioning it on the list.

Mario

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMF record for number of program executions?

2023-11-09 Thread Steve Thompson
If you are willing to write an exit to get the info, you can get 
it via a CSV exit (I forget its name, but ALL "LOAD"s go through 
it). Understand, if you use that exit, it has to have a very 
short code path, can't cause a wait of any kind, or you will 
cause problems for all address spaces in that LPAR. The idea is 
to capture the DSN & member and immediately write it to an SMF 
buffer or similar so you can immediately return control.


But other than what others have said, there is no other way to 
see all dynamically loaded subroutines or load-modules. You will 
not capture static routines as the LNKEDT doesn't use that 
interface.


I believe that IBM Products make use of that or another 
undocumented path through VLF that is handling LLA and a bit of 
caching of modules.


Regards,
Steve Thompson



On 11/9/2023 4:56 PM, Glenn Miller wrote:

Hi Linda,
When I have been requested to provide that information, I have used the IBM Z 
Software Asset Management ( aka iZSAM ) software product, which was previously 
known as IBM Tivoli Asset Discovery for z/OS ( aka TADz ).

Glenn Miller

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMF record for number of program executions?

2023-11-09 Thread Glenn Miller
Hi Linda,
When I have been requested to provide that information, I have used the IBM Z 
Software Asset Management ( aka iZSAM ) software product, which was previously 
known as IBM Tivoli Asset Discovery for z/OS ( aka TADz ).

Glenn Miller

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMF record for number of program executions?

2023-11-09 Thread Steve Wong
Hello Linda,
We have a program that produces the results you are seeking.
If you are interested in learning more about our free Beta Test Program, please 
contact us at i...@dtssoftware.com<mailto:i...@dtssoftware.com>

Regards,
Steve


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of L H 

Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2023 2:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU 
Subject: SMF record for number of program executions?

Hello,

I need to count the number of times some programs are executed on z/OS.

Not job names or CICS Tranids, but the times Cobol object code executed.

Does anyone know if a SMF record exists to record this, or does anyone have
an Assembler program to read the SMF and produce the counts?  Or a Merrill
example?

Any assistance or reference to manuals, cbttape, etc., is appreciated.

Thanks, Linda

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMF record for number of program executions?

2023-11-09 Thread Charles Mills
As @Ituriel says, If you want the jobstep program it is found in some of the 
SMF 30 records. No trick to finding it. IIRC it is very straightforward.

"Every program" comes up here from time to time and is basically impossible. 
There is no supported way. If you want to intercept SVCs (and I suspect you 
don't!) then you can get most of them. You are still not at 100%. A user could, 
for example, read in a program using BPAM and then branch to it.

There is another program name in one of the SMF segments. Highest CPU 
utilization program or something like that. It's an additional clue, but it is 
nowhere near "every program."

Charles

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 19:14:23 +, Ituriel do Neto 
 wrote:

>If the program you want is specified in EXEC PGM= statement, then it is 
>possible to use SMF 30.
>
>If it is a subroutine, then it will be much more complicated.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMF record for number of program executions?

2023-11-09 Thread Ituriel do Neto
If the program you want is specified in EXEC PGM= statement, then it is 
possible to use SMF 30.

If it is a subroutine, then it will be much more complicated.


Best Regards

Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
z/OS System Programmer






Em quinta-feira, 9 de novembro de 2023 às 16:01:27 BRT, L H 
 escreveu: 





Hello,

I need to count the number of times some programs are executed on z/OS.

Not job names or CICS Tranids, but the times Cobol object code executed.

Does anyone know if a SMF record exists to record this, or does anyone have
an Assembler program to read the SMF and produce the counts?  Or a Merrill
example?

Any assistance or reference to manuals, cbttape, etc., is appreciated.

Thanks, Linda

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


SMF record for number of program executions?

2023-11-09 Thread L H
Hello,

I need to count the number of times some programs are executed on z/OS.

Not job names or CICS Tranids, but the times Cobol object code executed.

Does anyone know if a SMF record exists to record this, or does anyone have
an Assembler program to read the SMF and produce the counts?  Or a Merrill
example?

Any assistance or reference to manuals, cbttape, etc., is appreciated.

Thanks, Linda

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN