Shmuel,
I don't know if one can compare UDP or TCP/IP to SDLC..especially with all the
work done by the The NCP for example in front end processors, I.e.; 3745..
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Nov 10, 2013, at 9:28 AM, Shmuel Metz
In e19093b1-b70e-4f98-9c5a-c0aeb5409...@yahoo.com, on 11/11/2013
at 08:08 AM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com said:
I don't know if one can compare UDP or TCP/IP to SDLC..especially
with all the work done by the The NCP for example in front end
processors, I.e.; 3745..
You brought up error
Shmuel,
Very true you pay for it somewhere in the application layer or the protocol.
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Nov 11, 2013, at 4:46 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In
In 2584076656382863.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
11/09/2013
at 12:12 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
Imagine an alterate universe without TCP/IP but an Internet very
simlar to ours; Google; Facebook; Skype; iTunes; NetFlix; and all;
all running (FSVO) smoothly on
In 35aa33f2-c486-486a-8400-15f55d1c2...@yahoo.com, on 11/09/2013
at 02:20 PM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com said:
I think that's a IBM question...bandwidth SDLC required more for
error recovery, for example.
How so?
Admittedly SDLC took more bandwidth for error recovery than UDP
g,dr.
Ed,
I would like to say using SNI made life easier. Especially when you have
company who like their own kingdoms
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Nov 9, 2013, at 3:57 PM, Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net wrote:
Paul,
A LONG LONG
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 11:49:40 -0800, Jon Perryman wrote:
... sad that he's bringing others to the dark side.
...
* z/OS: SNA existed long before TCP/IP was available. SNA was a robust,
reliable and secure communications methodology. Once TCP was became available,
we had the same situation as
From: Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Saturday, November 9, 2013 10:12 AM
Subject: SNA vs TCP/IP (was: z/OS is antique ...)
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 11:49:40 -0800, Jon Perryman wrote:
... sad that he's bringing others to the dark
, November 9, 2013 10:12 AM
Subject: SNA vs TCP/IP (was: z/OS is antique ...)
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 11:49:40 -0800, Jon Perryman wrote:
... sad that he's bringing others to the dark side.
...
* z/OS: SNA existed long before TCP/IP was available. SNA was a robust,
reliable and secure
On Sat, 9 Nov 2013 11:03:43 -0800, Jon Perryman jperr...@pacbell.net wrote:
The DARK SIDE was not in reference to TCP/IP.
“Merely corroborative detail, intended to give artistic verisimilitude to
an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative. -- WSG
As far as TCP over SNA, we can easily list as
Subject: SNA vs TCP/IP (was: z/OS is antique ...)
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 11:49:40 -0800, Jon Perryman wrote:
... sad that he's bringing others to the dark side.
...
* z/OS: SNA existed long before TCP/IP was available. SNA was a robust,
reliable and secure communications methodology. Once TCP
, but did we get 'the best'? I doubt it.
ALH
-Original Message-
From: Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 13:12
Subject: SNA vs TCP/IP (was: z/OS is antique ...)
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 11:49:40 -0800, Jon Perryman
Paul,
A LONG LONG time ago we had bumped in to the maxsuba of 255.
IBM almost simultaneously came out with a outrageously expensive add
on (memory was $5000 a month) to get rid of it.
My management said NFW to the cost and told me to live with it. We
had to start turning away customers and
Ed,
Agreed, I did that on a worldwide basis..a lot of manual overhead
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Nov 9, 2013, at 3:57 PM, Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net wrote:
Paul,
A LONG LONG time ago we had bumped in to the maxsuba of
14 matches
Mail list logo
