AW: Re: STC as batch

> Look up "started jobs" in the fine manuals. That will not make it a "batch job". -- Peter Hunkeler -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the mes

Re: STC as batch

Look up "started jobs" in the fine manuals. Is it possible to invoke a STC by submitting a batch Job ? If so will it just run by adding Job card ? I am sorry for being ignorant. Any suggestions would help. HTH, ::DISCLAIMER:: -

Re: STC as batch

@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: 26 November, 2016 7:32 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: STC as batch Oh sure, anything you can do in an STC you can do in a batch job (security, etc., permitting). Just clone the JCL, slap a job card on it, and submit it. Repeat until you get

Re: STC as batch

>I had to look up IEFJOBS. That’s the DD name in MSTJCLxx started tasks with >job cards. In our case, IEFJOBS points to SYS1.STCJOBS. Installation defined. STCs with JOB statements (aka started jobs) can be put in either //IEFJOBS or //IEDPDSI concatenation. A START command is "S memnam

Re: STC as batch

Behalf Of Peter Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 8:02 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: STC as batch Hi, Thanks for the reply. In our environment the STARTED TASK class are not active. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff

Re: STC as batch

ger > 323-715-0595 Mobile > 626-302-7535 Office > robin...@sce.com > > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Bill Ashton > Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 3:51 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU &g

Re: STC as batch

-302-7535 Office robin...@sce.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Bill Ashton Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 3:51 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):Re: STC as batch You can also add a job to the

Re: STC as batch

You can also add a job to the IEFJOBS file if you have it defined, and you can then have a Started Job. On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Wayne Bickerdike wrote: > For CICS, yes it can run as a started job. > > CA-Datacom can run as a job too. > > Whatever you want to do, try itWrap a job car

Re: STC as batch

For CICS, yes it can run as a started job. CA-Datacom can run as a job too. Whatever you want to do, try itWrap a job card around the STC or use an instream proc with a job card and see what happens. On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 4:59 AM, Peter Hunkeler wrote: > >Is it possible to invoke a S

AW: STC as batch

>Is it possible to invoke a STC by submitting a batch Job ? If so will it just run by adding Job card ? >From the few answers so far I think it becomes clear more detail is needed on >what you want to achieve. -- Peter Hunkeler --

AW: Re: STC as batch

>STCs and Jobs are different MVS "units of work." Your question is analogous to >asking "is it possible for a dog to be a cat?" No, it is not. Once the program runs, there is little difference left. In your analogy, I'd say a dog stays a dog. The difference is whether it can get immediate acc

Re: STC as batch

-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 9:14 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):Re: STC as batch STCs and Jobs are different MVS "units of work." Your question is analogous to asking "is it possible for a dog to be a cat?

Re: (External):Re: STC as batch

Mills Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 9:14 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):Re: STC as batch STCs and Jobs are different MVS "units of work." Your question is analogous to asking "is it possible for a dog to be a cat?" No, it is not. But you can train a do

Re: STC as batch

know how the rest of your post applies to your first question. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 4:00 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: STC as batch Hi Is it po

AW: Re: STC as batch

>Look up STCJOBS (I forget which manual). > >It was superficially developed so that you can run an STC specifying a >jobcard to pass for example accounting information. This is still an STC not a job. but, yes, it may serve the OPs needs. -- Peter Hunkeler --

Re: STC as batch

Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 6:00 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: STC as batch Hi Is it possible to invoke a STC by submitting a batch Job ? If so will it just run by adding Job card ? I am sorry for being

AW: Re: STC as batch

​>Can you run an STC as a batch job? Most of the time you can simply by >putting the proper JOB card ​in front of it: > >//STCNAME JOB (ACCT),'RUN STCNAME',CLASS=A,MSGCLASS=X >//STCNAME EXEC PROC=STCNAME >// > > >However, this will _NOT_ work properly if the STC is a single step STC >whic

Re: STC as batch

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Peter wrote: > Hi > > Is it possible to invoke a STC by submitting a batch Job ? If so will it > just run by adding Job card ? I am sorry for being ignorant. Any > suggestions would help. > > Peter > > ​What we do to start an STC using a batch job, which is schedu

Re: STC as batch

November, 2016 13:00 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: STC as batch Hi Is it possible to invoke a STC by submitting a batch Job ? If so will it just run by adding Job card ? I am sorry for being ignorant. Any suggestions would help. Peter

STC as batch

Hi Is it possible to invoke a STC by submitting a batch Job ? If so will it just run by adding Job card ? I am sorry for being ignorant. Any suggestions would help. Peter -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access inst