Re: Words fail me!

2021-11-15 Thread David Crayford
gt; Unformatted System Services. >> >> >> -- >> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz >> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 >> >> ________ >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf >> of Matt Hogst

Re: Words fail me!

2021-11-15 Thread zMan
m: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf > of Matt Hogstrom [m...@hogstrom.org] > Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2021 1:29 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Words fail me! > > Unformatted System Services was used in VTAM to specify the scre

Re: Words fail me!

2021-11-15 Thread Seymour J Metz
ogstrom [m...@hogstrom.org] Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2021 1:29 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Words fail me! Unformatted System Services was used in VTAM to specify the screen and responses to uses to logon to formal VTAM sessions like TSO and CICS. USS was Unix System Servi

Re: Words fail me!

2021-11-15 Thread Peter Vander Woude
Prior to IBM introducing OMVS to z/OS, the term USS was used by VTAM as the acronym for Unformatted System Services. Once OMVS was introduced, I do seem to remember a bit of discussion on the use of USS, as VTAM folks used it, and it was starting to be used by the folks pushing for more use of

Re: Words fail me!

2021-11-13 Thread Matt Hogstrom
Unformatted System Services was used in VTAM to specify the screen and responses to uses to logon to formal VTAM sessions like TSO and CICS. USS was Unix System Services IIRC Matt Hogstrom PGP key 0F143BC1 > On Nov 13, 2021, at 21:02, greg.pr...@optusnet.com.au wrote: > > Way back when

Re: Words fail me!

2021-11-13 Thread greg.pr...@optusnet.com.au
Way back when (long before UNIX was added to MVS) the network sysprog told me that USS stood for Unformatted Screen Services. Years after that but years (decades?) ago, I noticed that some VTAM books were talking about UNIX System Services in a context completely unrelated to UNIX. I sent

Re: Words fail me!

2021-11-09 Thread Phil Smith III
Shmuel wrote about someone "spelling out" bind wrongly. That is a doozy! We had a tech writer-supposedly experienced-who we had to stop from "fixing" things like "userid" and "fileid" (this was on a VM product). She wanted "CP QUERY USER ID" and "Enter file ID" and like that. No, just no. But

Words fail me!

2021-11-07 Thread Seymour J Metz
I've seen some doozies, but this takes the cake. Anyone else have an example of a author blindly assuming that an upper case word needs to be explained with a totally wrong expansion? Yes, There is a Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND), but it has nothing to do with logical units or even SNA .